• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are only helping to make our point.

Who is "we?"

Of course they are going to write a book. That is why it is a hoax. They made it up after the fact.

Your burden of proof.

The men in the launch room did not see the lightning and that was their job.

No it wasn't.

The spectators including the president did not see it. The man in charge of the whole launch did not see it.

Irrelevant; it was caught on the pad cameras.

Of course they are going to write a book that is not true.

You're the one accusing people of lying. Where's your proof?

Let's see you produce three eyewitnesses that are not a nasa persons. You cannot do it.

Let's see you first try to explain away the photographic evidence that already exists before you go demanding more evidence.
 
Don't let them get you down Peter. You are on the right track for sure for sure.

I recently spent a full weekend with a girlfriend of mine reviewing the Apollo 12 Mission.

Boy howdy, does this sound like a familiar story.

The LM spaceship was not even turned on when the rocketship blasted off. If that was the case, and it was, how could they check the LM spaceship out?

By turning it on and checking it out at the appropriate time in the mission. If you had studied Apollo like you claim, you'd be familiar with these pre-planned checkpoints.

I think Jarrah White and some of the others will crack the case wide open soon.

Nope. After 40 years of peddling the same nonsense and hiding behind walled gardens, there's no more proof now than there has been. The Moon landing hoax is a money-making and attention-getting scheme perpetrated knowingly by ignorant people who absolutely refuse to make themselves in any way accountable for their lies.

My cousin worked in the space industry and believes it was all made up and she has got a PhD.

Nope.
 
You are only helping to make our point. Of course they are going to write a book. That is why it is a hoax. They made it up after the fact. The men in the launch room did not see the lightning and that was their job. The spectators including the president did not see it. The man in charge of the whole launch did not see it. Of course they are going to write a book that is not true. That is my whole point to it. Let's see you produce three eyewitnesses that are not a nasa persons. You cannot do it.

Yea, and the launch cameras didn't show anything either...oh wait, they did. My biggest concern of course is why exactly would 'They' fake a lightning strike anyway.

I'm sure everybody who dealt with that little minor emergency that day would be quite amused at somebody claiming it didn't happen.
 
Last edited:
Don't let them get you down Peter. You are on the right track for sure for sure.

If you mean the bit where he said he believed the landings took place, then yes, he is.

I recently spent a full weekend with a girlfriend of mine reviewing the Apollo 12 Mission.

Well I bet that was one for the scrapbook.

Did you know that the lightning strike was faked? None of the chase planes saw the lightning.

Sources?

None of the spectators gave first hand accounts of lightning,

Sources?

all the news reports were second hand. the reporters reported what they were told.

The launch was broadcast live, complete with crew reports of the electrical problems from the strike, lightning is blamed live on air by the ground.

The NASA officers in the Kennedy station all denied they saw lightning except for one person. How can only one person see the lightning?

Sources. etc.

The LM spaceship was not even turned on when the rocketship blasted off.

Why would it be? It weas buried inside the SIV-B until it was connected to the CSM after TLI.

If that was the case, and it was, how could they check the LM spaceship out?

By turning it on. See above.

The head control room astronaut wrote a book recently and changed his first story.

Which one? Which story did he change and from what? What does a "head control room astronaut" do?

You should keep plugging away. I think Jarrah White and some of the others will crack the case wide open soon.

Jarrah White is a spineless coward, bully and a liar. Neither he nor any of his intellectually challenged compatriots in this fool's errand have ever proven anything other than their ability to con people with misrepresentations and falsehoods and suck money from the gullible.

My cousin worked in the space industry and believes it was all made up and she has got a PhD.

In what capacity? What is her PhD subject?

I have a PhD and I believe it is all true. I am evidently better informed than you are, so if I were you I'd believe me, not your cousin.

~shrugs~
 
Last edited:
"Don't let them get to you, [OtherNewPoster], we got them on the run!"
"I was going over Apollo with my [friend, girlfriend, neighbor, chess club, sister] and we found the following easily-debunked anomalies."
"My [brother, sister, cousin, roommate] is a fully qualified [scientist, engineer, professor] and doesn't believe in Apollo."

You're right: this is a boring thread. So darn repetitive.
 
If you've ever been in the Firing Room this wouldn't even be a question you'd entertain.
That's correct. Nobody who knows anything about space operations would think that a bunch of controllers would be looking at the bird, or the clouds into which the bird had disappeared, rather than their telemetry. That's what spectators are for.
 
That's correct. Nobody who knows anything about space operations would think that a bunch of controllers would be looking at the bird, or the clouds into which the bird had disappeared, rather than their telemetry. That's what spectators are for.

Also, how big is the rocket, as seen from the ground, after 36 seconds of flight? I know. Does someone's magical PhD sister/cousin/roommate?
 
Yea, and the launch cameras didn't show anything either...oh wait, they did. My biggest concern of course is why exactly would 'They' fake a lightning strike anyway.

I'm sure everybody who dealt with that little minor emergency that day would be quite amused at somebody claiming it didn't happen.
It was all a ruse to make John Aaron look like a "a steely eyed missile man" hero, yeah that's the ticket!;)
 
None of the spectators gave first hand accounts of lightning, all the news reports were second hand.

By an odd coincidence, someone going by the handle "LuckySparks" posted a video on YouTube of the post launch press conference. Several reporters claim to have seen the lightning strike. Of course, you have probably never seen this video, as you are presumably not the person who posted it there.
 
By an odd coincidence, someone going by the handle "LuckySparks" posted a video on YouTube of the post launch press conference. Several reporters claim to have seen the lightning strike. Of course, you have probably never seen this video, as you are presumably not the person who posted it there.

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRlewPTIdsN3FUld_MHBFRg?feature=results_main

That is definitely a docsocks channel. Created with a blur of characters, then using the name Lucky Sparks(with a space) as the channel name.

Now, if only I could remember where I had seen something similar.....hmmmm.

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCH3dbhPPvI_Tm0eT271J1Ng
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom