What's your theory about 9/11?

None of you have really outlined the official ae911truth theory:

-Bush presidency starts Jan 20, 2001 and he starts planning false flag attack
-Contact made with terrorists and army (local contact) and air-force and various agencies
- Hastily arranges more pilot training lessons, that have been going on for years
-Scientist agree new thermite weapon best for the job, which is favored over putting a buster bunker on the planes.
-Thermite casing is then designed to survive the fire and any impact damage from the plane.
-Bush decides that it may not be enough to demolish two 110 story towers with 7.6 million square feet and he decides to add the 25 story WTC 7 with another 600,000 square feet of floor area. (this was perhaps their biggest mistake!)
-Local contractor ACE Elevators bribed millions of dollars to place charges in elevator
-Security at immigration, airports and buildings, bribed to look the other way.
-Explosives placed at all levels ready for the big day

- The big day was selected to occur the day after a Giants-Broncos game and a Michael Jackson concert at the Garden, so that most of the financial sector would sleep in.
- Planes impacted towers at the agreed levels with a big bang, avoiding the fire-proof explosives that were cleverly hidden at the same level....
- wait one hour to let most people escape, since the plan is not to kill people.
- then demolish WTC 1 and 2 towers with a small noiseless "bang" (at least compared to the impact explosion) with the failure starting at the impact level.
- then wait 7 more hours and demolish WTC 7

- 99.9% of structural engineers foolled into thinking that explosives were not involved.
And it completely fooled all the tall building experts, or they were part of it and had been consulted.

And here we are eight and a half years later arguing about it.! You know it makes sense, thats why Richard Gage needs thousands of dollars of donations to keep up the good fight.

Happy 4th of July everyone.!
 
Jews with laser beams from outer space did it.

Oh, wait. 9/11?

Sorry. That's the al-Qaeda with planes one.
 
None of you have really outlined the official ae911truth theory:

-Bush presidency starts Jan 20, 2001 and he starts planning false flag attack
-Contact made with terrorists and army (local contact) and air-force and various agencies
- Hastily arranges more pilot training lessons, that have been going on for years
-Scientist agree new thermite weapon best for the job, which is favored over putting a buster bunker on the planes.
-Thermite casing is then designed to survive the fire and any impact damage from the plane.
-Bush decides that it may not be enough to demolish two 110 story towers with 7.6 million square feet and he decides to add the 25 story WTC 7 with another 600,000 square feet of floor area. (this was perhaps their biggest mistake!)
-Local contractor ACE Elevators bribed millions of dollars to place charges in elevator
-Security at immigration, airports and buildings, bribed to look the other way.
-Explosives placed at all levels ready for the big day

- The big day was selected to occur the day after a Giants-Broncos game and a Michael Jackson concert at the Garden, so that most of the financial sector would sleep in.
- Planes impacted towers at the agreed levels with a big bang, avoiding the fire-proof explosives that were cleverly hidden at the same level....
- wait one hour to let most people escape, since the plan is not to kill people.
- then demolish WTC 1 and 2 towers with a small noiseless "bang" (at least compared to the impact explosion) with the failure starting at the impact level.
- then wait 7 more hours and demolish WTC 7

- 99.9% of structural engineers foolled into thinking that explosives were not involved.
And it completely fooled all the tall building experts, or they were part of it and had been consulted.

And here we are eight and a half years later arguing about it.! You know it makes sense, thats why Richard Gage needs thousands of dollars of donations to keep up the good fight.

Happy 4th of July everyone.!

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant. We must also remember that any parts of the plan which appear unnecessarily complicated or blatantly foolish were actually part of the NWO's master plan of masking its complicity from future investigations. Indeed, who would possibly suspect anyone of a plan so foolhardy? It was the perfect disguise. And it all would have worked had it not been for the intrepid, pseudo-scientific, anomaly-hunting heroes of the truther community.
 
None of you have really outlined the official ae911truth theory:

-Bush presidency starts Jan 20, 2001 and he starts planning false flag attack
-Contact made with terrorists and army (local contact) and air-force and various agencies
- Hastily arranges more pilot training lessons, that have been going on for years
-Scientist agree new thermite weapon best for the job, which is favored over putting a buster bunker on the planes.
-Thermite casing is then designed to survive the fire and any impact damage from the plane.
-Bush decides that it may not be enough to demolish two 110 story towers with 7.6 million square feet and he decides to add the 25 story WTC 7 with another 600,000 square feet of floor area. (this was perhaps their biggest mistake!)
-Local contractor ACE Elevators bribed millions of dollars to place charges in elevator
-Security at immigration, airports and buildings, bribed to look the other way.
-Explosives placed at all levels ready for the big day

- The big day was selected to occur the day after a Giants-Broncos game and a Michael Jackson concert at the Garden, so that most of the financial sector would sleep in.
- Planes impacted towers at the agreed levels with a big bang, avoiding the fire-proof explosives that were cleverly hidden at the same level....
- wait one hour to let most people escape, since the plan is not to kill people.
- then demolish WTC 1 and 2 towers with a small noiseless "bang" (at least compared to the impact explosion) with the failure starting at the impact level.
- then wait 7 more hours and demolish WTC 7

- 99.9% of structural engineers foolled into thinking that explosives were not involved.
And it completely fooled all the tall building experts, or they were part of it and had been consulted.

And here we are eight and a half years later arguing about it.! You know it makes sense, thats why Richard Gage needs thousands of dollars of donations to keep up the good fight.

Happy 4th of July everyone.!

:D

Oh you forgot to mention these same people weren't smart enough to plant a few WMD in Iraq.
 
9-11 was orchestrated by a conspiracy of all the local NYC tv channels, to end channel 11's years of free advertising.
 
And it completely fooled all the tall building experts, or they were part of it and had been consulted.


Forgive me for carving up the original but I want to deal with it in what I see as the best order.
I think that many people would consider me as reasonably well qualified in tall buildings in terms of construction, retro-refitting and alteration with a certain amount of explosive demolition experience having had overview control of two sites contracted by Explosive Demolition Inc here in the U.K.
I have not been consulted by any agencies to do with 911 and mostly detest government departments - but enough of my taxman problems!

The only tall building "experts" fooled were the ones ascribing Truther philosophy.


Scientist agree new thermite weapon best for the job,[ /quote]

Oh give me strength! Thermite is not a weapon - it's at best, a rather tricky heating substance used to weld railway rails!!! Why the hell would "scientist" or "scientists" for that matter waste their time trying to perfect such items when there are so many better proper weapons already available?

which is favored over putting a buster bunker on the planes.

So now these "scientists" are thinking of putting "bunker busters" on civilian airliners eh?

Thermite casing is then designed to survive the fire and any impact damage from the plane.

I think I'm going to choke myself to death laughing so much!


Bush decides that it may not be enough to demolish two 110 story towers with 7.6 million square feet and he decides to add the 25 story WTC 7 with another 600,000 square feet of floor area. (this was perhaps their biggest mistake!)

So now you're making out the guy that chokes on pretzels in front of his T.V. and can bearly ad lib to save his life to be the greatest criminal mastermind since The Joker!!! Utter tosh.

Local contractor ACE Elevators bribed millions of dollars to place charges in elevator

So you think that putting charges in the elevator ( or shafts ) could bring about a demolition of Building 7 as we all saw on T.V. ? Before you answer - you'd better think of how many clearance contractors were bribed to hide explosively cut lumps of massive steel sections in their lunch boxes because I haven't seen any in the thousands of photos!

-Explosives placed at all levels ready for the big day

Ah now, there's a thing - you wouldn't need them "at all levels" so you are particularly out of your league on that one.

the fire-proof explosives that were cleverly hidden

Do tell me how this might be accomplished - I promise not to laugh till you finished explaining.

None of the wreckage in any photo shows the slightest sign of explosive contact.
 
Hi Alan,

I'm pretty sure Tom is mocking the truth movement and does a fine job of it.

He had me fooled initially as well. :)
 
None of you have really outlined the official ae911truth theory:

-Bush presidency starts Jan 20, 2001 and he starts planning false flag attack
-Contact made with terrorists and army (local contact) and air-force and various agencies
- Hastily arranges more pilot training lessons, that have been going on for years
-Scientist agree new thermite weapon best for the job, which is favored over putting a buster bunker on the planes.
-Thermite casing is then designed to survive the fire and any impact damage from the plane.
-Bush decides that it may not be enough to demolish two 110 story towers with 7.6 million square feet and he decides to add the 25 story WTC 7 with another 600,000 square feet of floor area. (this was perhaps their biggest mistake!)
-Local contractor ACE Elevators bribed millions of dollars to place charges in elevator
-Security at immigration, airports and buildings, bribed to look the other way.
-Explosives placed at all levels ready for the big day

- The big day was selected to occur the day after a Giants-Broncos game and a Michael Jackson concert at the Garden, so that most of the financial sector would sleep in.
- Planes impacted towers at the agreed levels with a big bang, avoiding the fire-proof explosives that were cleverly hidden at the same level....
- wait one hour to let most people escape, since the plan is not to kill people.
- then demolish WTC 1 and 2 towers with a small noiseless "bang" (at least compared to the impact explosion) with the failure starting at the impact level.
- then wait 7 more hours and demolish WTC 7

- 99.9% of structural engineers foolled into thinking that explosives were not involved.
And it completely fooled all the tall building experts, or they were part of it and had been consulted.

And here we are eight and a half years later arguing about it.! You know it makes sense, thats why Richard Gage needs thousands of dollars of donations to keep up the good fight.

Happy 4th of July everyone.!

We're not really arguing about it.I just come hear to have a giggle with the truthers.Not you,because you are only pretending to be a truther.The truth movement is dead and and buried,and you can't argue with a corpse.
 
Cross-posting into on-topic thread.
Certainly. I'm glad you asked. The 911 attack was an inside job. Or outside job, if you want to use that term. Complete video fakery regarding 'live' video feeds and consequent video recordings. Don't believe the lie. Don't believe the hype. Expose you, we will. Yoda says.

Anders:
Perhaps you could flesh out the explanation above, with the "Who, How, Why, What," etc.

Thanks!
 
The 2 F15s out of Otis AFB were supposed to do a 'Patriot' fly over of the WTC a few minutes AFTER WTC2 was struck so that people could look up and say,"Just missed,if only they'd gotten here a few minutes sooner". They were scrambled perfectly to do it had the pilots followed protocol and flown SUBsonic. NEADS' leadership had ever reason to believe that they would since the pilots were to suppose to think it was only an earlier than expected start to the morning scheduled (expected) hijacking drill. What NEADS leadership didn't know was that the pilots had been tipped off it was 'real' by Boston Center ATC supervisor (Bueno) who had violated protocol and called Otis tower himself trying to scramble fighters.
Once they were scrambled the pilots flew,"full blower" (Supersonic) directly towards NYC. Until NEADS leadership noticed and quickly redirected them to military controlled airspace over the sea (Whiskey 105) and put in a holding pattern to wait for flight 175 to hit. They were in that pattern when WTC2 was struck at 9:03.
The 911 Commission covered it up by moving the dot (location of fighters at 9:03) on the map of the Otis fighters flight route from it's real location within the pattern to just before the pattern but that created a problem for anyone who bothered to crunch the numbers. Had the pilots flown the way they say they did,"In the air before the radar kicked in","full blower all the way" (8:52-9:03) then they would have been over NYC by 9:03 NOT 100 miles away as the Commission claims (Otis=153 miles from NYC).
I will further claim that the Otis F15s were only given enough fuel to do a 'patriotic' flyover of the WTC but not enough to to be a threat to the other hijacked planes.
Langley AFB is simply too close to Washington DC (6 minutes by F16) and they needed an excuse to send the Langley's F16s to the North East to allow Flight 77 to strike Washington from the South West. It was supposed to be Flight 93 but was 40 minutes delayed,so Boston Center's military liaison made up the false phantom 11 report to cover for the delayed 93 (they knew flight 11 had crashed 35 minutes before).
There was one problem though,if word of Flight 77 somehow got to the pilots they would then think there were 2 hijacked planes heading toward Washington DC at the same time from opposite directions. That would have them fly straight to Washington DC itself and in a position to stop Flight 77.
To prevent that from happening Langley's Supervisor of Flying Capt. Borgstrum (whose job it was to relay mission orders & communicate with civilian ATC-from whom he'd learn of Flight 77 and tip off the pilots) was ordered up in a third unarmed F16. With Borgstrum in the air and no one on the ground doing his job,NEADS leadership was able to ensure a SOP scramble would occur (requires fighters to fly 60 miles East over the Atlantic-Away from Washington DC).
After the SOP scramble the Langley F16s were then directed North East away from Washington DC until after they themselves had confirmed to NEADS that the Pentagon had been hit. They were NEVER direct to Washington DC until after NEADS leadership knew the attack had succeeded.
It appears Gen. Arnold forgot that things had gone according to the original plan and reverted back to it tell the Commission that Langley's F16s had been scrambled for flight 93 which hadn't even been hijacked yet when the scramble order was given (9:24). There you go,my theory.
 
...What NEADS leadership didn't know was that the pilots had been tipped off it was 'real' by Boston Center ATC supervisor (Bueno) who had violated protocol and called Otis tower himself trying to scramble fighters.
Once they were scrambled the pilots flew,"full blower" (Supersonic) directly towards NYC. Until NEADS leadership noticed and quickly redirected them to military controlled airspace over the sea (Whiskey 105) and put in a holding pattern to wait for flight 175 to hit. They were in that pattern when WTC2 was struck at 9:03.
The 911 Commission covered it up by moving the dot (location of fighters at 9:03) on the map of the Otis fighters flight route from it's real location within the pattern to just before the pattern but that created a problem for anyone who bothered to crunch the numbers. Had the pilots flown the way they say they did,"In the air before the radar kicked in","full blower all the way" (8:52-9:03) then they would have been over NYC by 9:03 NOT 100 miles away as the Commission claims (Otis=153 miles from NYC).
I will further claim that the Otis F15s were only given enough fuel to do a 'patriotic' flyover of the WTC but not enough to to be a threat to the other hijacked planes.
Langley AFB is simply too close to Washington DC (6 minutes by F16) and they needed an excuse to send the Langley's F16s to the North East to allow Flight 77 to strike Washington from the South West. It was supposed to be Flight 93 but was 40 minutes delayed,so Boston Center's military liaison made up the false phantom 11 report to cover for the delayed 93 (they knew flight 11 had crashed 35 minutes before).
There was one problem though,if word of Flight 77 somehow got to the pilots they would then think there were 2 hijacked planes heading toward Washington DC at the same time from opposite directions. That would have them fly straight to Washington DC itself and in a position to stop Flight 77.
To prevent that from happening Langley's Supervisor of Flying Capt. Borgstrum (whose job it was to relay mission orders & communicate with civilian ATC-from whom he'd learn of Flight 77 and tip off the pilots) was ordered up in a third unarmed F16. With Borgstrum in the air and no one on the ground doing his job,NEADS leadership was able to ensure a SOP scramble would occur (requires fighters to fly 60 miles East over the Atlantic-Away from Washington DC).
After the SOP scramble the Langley F16s were then directed North East away from Washington DC until after they themselves had confirmed to NEADS that the Pentagon had been hit. They were NEVER direct to Washington DC until after NEADS leadership knew the attack had succeeded.
It appears Gen. Arnold forgot that things had gone according to the original plan and reverted back to it tell the Commission that Langley's F16s had been scrambled for flight 93 which hadn't even been hijacked yet when the scramble order was given (9:24). There you go,my theory.
Nonsense. Looks like you left out reserach.

This makes you post fantasy.
until after NEADS leadership knew the attack had succeeded
A lie, or fantasy? You debunk yourself by making wild claims and outright lies. No need to comment on fiction. There will be no Pulitzer for this.

At least you have a theory; no evidence, a bunch of opinions.
 
Last edited:
The 2 F15s out of Otis AFB were supposed to do a 'Patriot' fly over of the WTC a few minutes AFTER WTC2 was struck so that people could look up and say,"Just missed,if only they'd gotten here a few minutes sooner".

Evidence? Something? Anything at all to substantiate this?

They were scrambled perfectly to do it had the pilots followed protocol and flown SUBsonic.

Fail, they were scrambled as fast as they could. Otis got the head up at 08:34. 4 minutes later at 08:38 Joe Cooper called NEADS, the very first time NORAD got any word of the situation of AA11. 3 minutes later, 08:41 NEADS places Otis at battlestations. Two pilots rush to their F-15s and begin preparing them. 5 minutes later, 08:46 as AA11 impacted the WTC, and as UA175 gets hijacked, NEADS scrambles the two F-15s. 6 minutes, 08:52 as UA175 transponder change is just being noticed by New York TMU, two F-15s from Otis are airborne, still looking to intercept AA11, unknown about it's fate or the situation with UA175. ~09:00 unable to locate AA11, and unaware of UA175's imminent impact with the WTC, F-15s are sent to hold in military airspace. 09:03 UA175 hits WTC, NEADS receives word from NY TMU that they've lost UA175, no body knows what the hell is going on. F-15s are sent 10 minutes later to Combat Air Patrol over Manhattan. There is no possible way the F-15s could have made it to NY to stop an aircraft which no one in authority knew was hijacked until after it hit its target. There is no possible way they could have scrambled faster. They were given 9 minutes warning of AA11, no warning of UA175, this is proven fact, not theory. You are wrong.

NEADS' leadership had ever reason to believe that they would since the pilots were to suppose to think it was only an earlier than expected start to the morning scheduled (expected) hijacking drill.

Long debunked rubbish. The NORAD drill of the day was a combined exercise with Canada to simulate Russian bombers coming in over Alaska and Canada. F-15 pilots on standby had nothing at all to do with any drill, they were on standby for air defense, not for some drill happening thousands of miles away from their base. The drill was canceled before it started. If anything, because everyone was getting into their stations for the drill, the response was, if anything, better.

What NEADS leadership didn't know was that the pilots had been tipped off it was 'real' by Boston Center ATC supervisor (Bueno) who had violated protocol and called Otis tower himself trying to scramble fighters.

Violated protocol? He was a civilian improvising on a situation which they had not prepared for. He was calling anyone he could. The pilots only 'tip' off was that after the call they were told to begin suiting up, that they may get a call to battlestations soon. They had no idea there was any potential suicide risk from the hijackers. Even airborne, they did not know of the fate of AA11 or UA175 until much later, no body did.

Once they were scrambled the pilots flew,"full blower" (Supersonic) directly towards NYC. Until NEADS leadership noticed and quickly redirected them to military controlled airspace over the sea (Whiskey 105) and put in a holding pattern to wait for flight 175 to hit. They were in that pattern when WTC2 was struck at 9:03.

Total lie. NORAD tapes dispute your theory. You have no evidence to substantiate this.

The 911 Commission covered it up by moving the dot (location of fighters at 9:03) on the map of the Otis fighters flight route from it's real location within the pattern to just before the pattern but that created a problem for anyone who bothered to crunch the numbers.

Oh really? Care to 'crunch the numbers' and substantiate this claim? Or is this another which hold no water?

Had the pilots flown the way they say they did,"In the air before the radar kicked in","full blower all the way" (8:52-9:03) then they would have been over NYC by 9:03 NOT 100 miles away as the Commission claims (Otis=153 miles from NYC).

And done what exactly? AA11 was in the tower, even though they still thought at 09:03 it was still in the air somewhere. No one knew of UA175 until after it hit the tower, NORAD tapes confirm this. From known hijacking, to impact, UA175 took 10 minutes. No one got any warning. F-15s were sent to Tail AA11, not shoot down commercial airlines. They did not have the mission, the orders, the intel, the time, or the authority to engage anything on 9/11.

I will further claim that the Otis F15s were only given enough fuel to do a 'patriotic' flyover of the WTC but not enough to to be a threat to the other hijacked planes.

What other planes? What evidence do you have to back up this one? F-15s burned to NY, were in the air well over an hour, CAP Manhattan. Langley were put in standby in case they needed to swap. They didn't have to, Team 2 3, aerial tankers were sent to hold off NY. F-15s refueled off Team 2 3 overhead JFK airport. They maintained the CAP. Your argument is unsubstantiated and illogical.

Langley AFB is simply too close to Washington DC (6 minutes by F16) and they needed an excuse to send the Langley's F16s to the North East to allow Flight 77 to strike Washington from the South West. It was supposed to be Flight 93 but was 40 minutes delayed,so Boston Center's military liaison made up the false phantom 11 report to cover for the delayed 93 (they knew flight 11 had crashed 35 minutes before).

Lie, no one had confirmed anything. The incorrect report regarding AA11 came from the FAA, not Boston. It was a mistake in the confusion of the day. It made no difference, no one knew AA77 was inbound until Regan National picked up the primary 6 miles from the White House. NEADS got heads up that AA77 was missing seconds before they received word of a primary over Washington DC. AA77 had already impacted the Pentagon. Langley F-16s took a standard scramble heading instead of the one NEADS sent. NEADS did not order them out over the water, this is well heard in the NORAD tapes. They prove you wrong. By the time TSD showed UA93 was inbound to DC, F-16s from Andrews (not under the control of NEADS) were sent to intercept. UA93 was already down from the passenger revolt over 10 minutes earlier. Langley's scramble mistake made no difference to the events of the day.

There was one problem though,if word of Flight 77 somehow got to the pilots they would then think there were 2 hijacked planes heading toward Washington DC at the same time from opposite directions. That would have them fly straight to Washington DC itself and in a position to stop Flight 77.
To prevent that from happening Langley's Supervisor of Flying Capt. Borgstrum (whose job it was to relay mission orders & communicate with civilian ATC-from whom he'd learn of Flight 77 and tip off the pilots) was ordered up in a third unarmed F16. With Borgstrum in the air and no one on the ground doing his job,NEADS leadership was able to ensure a SOP scramble would occur (requires fighters to fly 60 miles East over the Atlantic-Away from Washington DC).

Except the major fact that No One Knew Of Flight 77 Before Impact. Your argument is void.

After the SOP scramble the Langley F16s were then directed North East away from Washington DC until after they themselves had confirmed to NEADS that the Pentagon had been hit. They were NEVER direct to Washington DC until after NEADS leadership knew the attack had succeeded.

Interesting choice of words, still no evidence to back this up at all, and all the evidence of the NORAD tapes against you. You've just gone off on a fairy tale, illogical, unproven, fact-less.

It appears Gen. Arnold forgot that things had gone according to the original plan and reverted back to it tell the Commission that Langley's F16s had been scrambled for flight 93 which hadn't even been hijacked yet when the scramble order was given (9:24).

Arnold had some events mixed. So what? That was the point of the commission, to sort out all the discrepancies and find the narrative for the event of that day. The commission figured it out. They also figured out Norman Minetta's testimony was a half hour out. They figured what happened, not just from one persons testimony, but from interviews with dozens, testimonies of hundreds, phone records, ATC records, RADAR data, NORAD recordings, gigabytes of data. You are taking a small piece of the giant puzzle and building a theory of woo with no evidence to back it up. A total fantasy.


Edit: oh, and welcome to JREF. Took your time.
 
Last edited:
FrankHT,

your theory acknowledges and incorporates many known facts, and ignores or denies relatively few, and not, in my opinion, to a fatal degree.

So at least your theory is not obviously wrong. (I'll stay away from details like your false assertion that the Otis alert crew might have thought they were merely on an exercise, had not Boston Center told them the nature of the incident. That is wrong for several reasons, but not a necessary component of your theory, I think)

But your story hinges on, or adds to the accepted facts, intentions on the parts of several players. So I would ask you: Which facts and which reasoning have compelled you to think these specific individuals actually had those intentions? In other words: What's your evidence?

An often wise advice when looking at the failures of people is: Do not ascribe to malice which can adequately be explained with incompetence or bad luck.
So why do you feel compelled to ascribe malice? Why is the imperfection of human procedures and cognition not adequate, in your mind?
 
Boston Center's military liaison made up the false phantom 11 report to cover for the delayed 93 (they knew flight 11 had crashed 35 minutes before).

Well at least FrankHT has the guts to accuse a specific person of treason. I wonder if he knows that Boston Center's military liaison is a member here?
 
More MEGO conspiracism.

Originally Posted by FrankHT
Boston Center's military liaison made up the false phantom 11 report to cover for the delayed 93 (they knew flight 11 had crashed 35 minutes before).


Well at least FrankHT has the guts to accuse a specific person of treason. I wonder if he knows that Boston Center's military liaison is a member here?

A specific, but un-named person. Another drive-by, MEGO conspiracy posting.
 
Long debunked rubbish. The NORAD drill of the day was a combined exercise with Canada to simulate Russian bombers coming in over Alaska and Canada. F-15 pilots on standby had nothing at all to do with any drill, they were on standby for air defense, not for some drill happening thousands of miles away from their base. The drill was canceled before it started.

So,you say the mornings scheduled drill had nothing to do with any hijacking and was to take place thousands of miles away? Alright then,explain this to me: "When they told me there was a hijack, my first reaction was 'Somebody started the exercise early,'" Nasypany later told me. The day's exercise was designed to run a range of scenarios, including a "traditional" simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum. "I actually said out loud, 'The hijack's not supposed to be for another hour,'" Nasypany recalled.[Quote-from vanity Fair 'Norad tapes ' Aug 2006-interview of maj. kevin nasypany]
 
Well at least FrankHT has the guts to accuse a specific person of treason. I wonder if he knows that Boston Center's military liaison is a member here?

If he is I would to ask him some questions. For example,Flight 11 struck WTC1 at 8:46 it was travelling South at nearly 500MPH. If it had continued then by 9:21 it would have already passed Washington DC and be to it's South. If there was no radar track on this phantom Flight 11,how did he know to send the fighters to the North East? There's NO WAY they could have known where Flight 11 was with no radar track on it since 8:46. But if 911 was an inside job they have known that Flight 77 was approaching Washington DC from the South West and sent the fighters in the opposite direction. So,how did they know?
 

Back
Top Bottom