Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

dafydd said:
And you never will.
Click to expand...
Which is why it's utterly pointless in engaging with Anders or clayton.

Whilst both of them are completely foolish, the bigger fools are those who will respond to their rubbish. Clayton and Anders best you all every time in that regard. If this was the real world you'd walk on by the nutters not engage with them, however you just can't help yourselves can you?
 
Captain_Swoop said:
it's a giggle.
Click to expand...

Yea, it's not like any of us think that we are in the trenches fighting a major battle to keep 9-11 conspiracies from spreading. Truthers are a tiny cult that only exists on the internet. I have 2 reasons for engaging them: 1. I'm fascinated by the psychology of conspiracy theorists, and B. I think some of it is worth a giggle.
 
Anders Lindman said:
It's still a simple operation. Very precisely timed (including amateur footage and near-real-time manipulation of live television feeds), so a lot of careful planning but the event itself was simple without the need for real planes.
Click to expand...

Either establish the bolded part is even possible IN YOUR NEXT POST or SHUT UP
 
I too would be very interested in how precisely-timed near-real-time manipulation of live television feeds works. I'm sure it just HAS to be possible, because why else would Anders use it to prove his point? :rolleyes:

Even more interesting in some ways is how they manipulated all those amateur videos. I eagerly await the technical explanation.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how they entered the images of the planes into the minds of the hundreds or thousands of real life witnesses.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Flat explosives painted with the same hue as the facade itself. I have even posted in other threads about how the inward bending could be created by mounting explosives inside the exterior steel columns.
Click to expand...

So why go to all the trouble and then fly planes into the building?
 
NoahFence said:
Either establish the bolded part is even possible IN YOUR NEXT POST or SHUT UP
Click to expand...

I have posted extensively about that in other threads. There was a delay of about 5 seconds, enough time to insert a crude 2D computer graphics silhouette of a plane into the live video feeds to 5 major television networks (no small television stations showed the second impact live). The delay was needed to precisely time the computer graphics plane with the fireball explosion.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I have posted extensively about that in other threads. There was a delay of about 5 seconds, enough time to insert a crude 2D computer graphics silhouette of a plane into the live video feeds to 5 major television networks (no small television stations showed the second impact live). The delay was needed to precisely time the computer graphics plane with the fireball explosion.
Click to expand...

You have not.

You lie.

Why?
 
Electromagnetic waves step in and prove no plane claims are insane.





Reality is not part of 911 truth no plane claims. Were the first no plane claims made by people with mental illness, now parroted by zombies/cult member who think there is a 911 truth movement?
 
Anders Lindman said:
Have you made a search on this forum? And found nothing about me posting about that? There should be plenty of posts by me about that.
Click to expand...

I have not searched on this forum. It's not needed. Based on the posting history of you and your kind, the default is that posts are a lie, until proven otherwise.

but just to keep you entertained, you talked about the "5 Major Networks" - what of the personal video's?
 
Anders Lindman said:
Have you made a search on this forum? And found nothing about me posting about that? There should be plenty of posts by me about that.
Click to expand...

So every single video, amateur, network, etc that showed a plane hitting the building was "altered"?
 
NoahFence said:
I have not searched on this forum. It's not needed. Based on the posting history of you and your kind, the default is that posts are a lie, until proven otherwise.

but just to keep you entertained, you talked about the "5 Major Networks" - what of the personal video's?
Click to expand...

The amateur videos were only shown later. Obviously not in the live television feeds.
 
twinstead said:
So every single video, amateur, network, etc that showed a plane hitting the building was "altered"?
Click to expand...

No. I posted a video earlier in this thread showing the explosion in the WTC facade without a plane. Later a CGI plane was added to that clip.
 
I see you all are quoting this "Anders Lindman" figure. Where do you get that from? I don't see him posting here.
 
I have already posted a lot about the no plane theory. I feel like I'm just repeating myself, so I give up on this now.
 
Anders Lindman said:
No. I posted a video earlier in this thread showing the explosion in the WTC facade without a plane. Later a CGI plane was added to that clip.
Click to expand...

So you have a video of a person who was at an angle where they couldn't film the airplanes impacting the building and your conclusion is that this is an unaltered video proving there was no plane? There's an alternate explanation that makes more sense, care to guess what it is?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom