Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

Mikeys, is the FDNY (or certain members of the FDNY) part of the conspiracy?
 
33453yt.gif
 
Mikeys said:
Anyone who backs up the video's ok and lined up with the official story can be a conspirator.
Click to expand...
RADAR backs up the video. RADAR is a conspirator?

RADAR is reality, your fake video claim, fantasy.

Mikeys said:
Ok, I give you that, maybe indeed the brothers faked it and sold it hot.Why would they do that?
Click to expand...
Flight 11 impacting the WTC can't be fake, RADAR tracked Flight 11 with all souls on board from takeoff to impact; verifying the video. Make your claim an uniformed lie, a stupid lie.

Mikeys said:
the official story.
Click to expand...
You forgot...
Mikeys said:
... I am quite unfamiliar with 911. ...
Click to expand...
You claim ignorance form the beginning, and post fantasy.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
RADAR backs up the video. RADAR is a conspirator?

Oops, you confuse reality with your fantasy world of lies.
Click to expand...
Does it also tell you contents in the video are not faked? Do you back up the contents in the video? No CGI manipulation before going to media outlets ?
 
Mikeys said:
Does it also tell you contents in the video are not faked? Do you back up the contents in the video? No CGI manipulation before going to media outlets ?
Click to expand...
Yes, the aircraft in the video is Flight 11 in a few videos. Flight 11 was accidentally seen in two more videos. Did you know that? When you line up the angles, time, from the location taken, they match the RADAR data.

You failure to do research makes most, if not all of your claims nonsense.

Countless people also saw both aircraft. RADAR backs up their witness statements. You don't do RADAR. RADAR debunks your claims.

Your overall assessment of 911 Stands!
Mikeys said:
... I am quite unfamiliar with 911. ...
Click to expand...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn3a--hf7_s
The thread topic is a video. In the video an idiot can't figure out 911 because he can't do physics, and he hates war. Not sure why hating war makes someone an idiot on physics, but in this case, extreme bias has taken over and the idiot makes up lies which you might like.


The idiot in the video says, "we've all seen what a bird can do a jet", and try to use this logic to imply a jet can't do the same to a steel building. It would be funny if it were not so sad he is an idiot on this issue. Flesh and blood impact a plane like a karate chop and damage an aluminum aircraft. Soft stuff breaks hard stuff! Then the soft aircraft can't break the "hard stuff" of the WTC? According to you the bird should be dustified by the aircraft impact, like you say the aircraft should against the WTC.

11 years of nonsense, and now the crazy claims get crazier.
 
beachnut said:
Yes, the aircraft in the video is Flight 11 in a few videos. Flight 11 was accidentally seen in two more videos. Did you know that? When you line up the angles, time, from the location taken, they match the RADAR data.

You failure to do research makes most, if not all of your claims nonsense.

Countless people also saw both aircraft. RADAR backs up their witness statements. You don't do RADAR. RADAR debunks your claims.

Your overall assessment of 911 Stands!
Click to expand...
You dodge actual questions skillfully but the video won't go away, no matter how many times you call me a liar. Why are you so devoted?



The idiot in the video says, "we've all seen what a bird can do a jet", and try to use this logic to imply a jet can't do the same to a steel building. It would be funny if it were not so sad he is an idiot on this issue. Flesh and blood impact a plane like a karate chop and damage an aluminum aircraft. Soft stuff breaks hard stuff! Then the soft aircraft can't break the "hard stuff" of the WTC? According to you the bird should be dustified by the aircraft impact, like you say the aircraft should against the WTC.
Click to expand...
Hey you are a crash expert. Why don't you show some material showing what a plane can do to stuff, something that will make the impact of 175 look credible.
 
Mikeys said:
You dodge actual questions skillfully but the video won't go away, no matter how many times you call me a liar. Why are you so devoted?
Click to expand...
Not one of the videos the FBI had were found to be fake. So you lied, there are only fake video made by 911 truth, the people you take your claims from because you...
Mikeys said:
... I am quite unfamiliar with 911. ...
Click to expand...

The OP video conclusions are nuts. The idiot says flesh and blood can damage an aluminum plane, but an aluminum plane can't do the damage seen on 911. Then he debunks himself showing the impact at the WTC with Flight 175 doing what he said it can't. Idiotic claim, from a nut.



Mikeys said:
Hey you are a crash expert. Why don't you show some material showing what a plane can do to stuff, something that will make the impact of 175 look credible.
Click to expand...

http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/exactsizeof767175.jpg
http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/Exactsizeof767.jpg

I have RADAR data that proves Flight 11 and 175 made these impact holes. Tracked from takeoff to impact on multiple RADAR sites.
One of the first things we do with aircraft incidences, we "pull" the RADAR data. It is real evidence, not fantasy nonsense from watching slo-mo video.

Proof for rational people. Are you a rational person?

Using the strength of the WTC shell, you can take E=1/2mv2, and see for yourself using math and physics, the aircraft would enter the buildings. For more accuracy you could add the engine thrust up to engine impact. Good luck. Do you do math?

The fact Flight 11 and 175 can damage the building as seen can be verified by any rational physics teacher; are you too bashful to ask a physics teacher. Seriously, I am an engineers and a pilot, but it only takes a grade school education to understand 911; why can't you?

Most of the posters at JREF understand 911 and don't need a stinken engineering degree, or an ATP to see 911 truth is nonsense.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Sorry, my bad. You can gather why I might have thought this.


Exactly how does who posted the video matter to what I posted?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't post a video that doesn't support my views, why would I?
Forget the video, I am not on a mission.
 
Mikeys said:
I wouldn't post a video that doesn't support my views, why would I?
Forget the video, I am not on a mission.
Click to expand...
Are you posting off topic then? Either you support the video, or you don't. If you say forget the video, you are off topic. Darn.

Ironically, the video you forgot is filled with the same nonsense you have pushed.
Birds damage planes.
Planes can't damage buildings.
Then you say planes can damage buildings but can't do the damage seen.
Then you say deceleration is wrong and never presented the data to support your claim.

You have posted lies about 911, are you now retracting all you lies? OOPS, said you don't know your claims were lies; you can't tell what is true and what is not.

Are you off topic again, or can you comment on, support, refute or do anything with the video that makes many of the same claims you do?
 
beachnut said:
Are you posting off topic then? Either you support the video, or you don't. If you say forget the video, you are off topic. Darn.

Ironically, the video you forgot is filled with the same nonsense you have pushed.
Birds damage planes.
Planes can't damage buildings.
Then you say planes can damage buildings but can't do the damage seen.
Then you say deceleration is wrong and never presented the data to support your claim.

You have posted lies about 911, are you now retracting all you lies? OOPS, said you don't know your claims were lies; you can't tell what is true and what is not.

Are you off topic again, or can you comment on, support, refute or do anything with the video that makes many of the same claims you do?
Click to expand...
birds, what birds. I was talking about another video. You are a plane crash expert and you can not find anything that shows a similar crash. Something that looks like the WTC crash, anything that shows a plane plough through a physical barrier, make a hole, cut through stuff, anything that can do as a benchmark.
 
Last edited:
Mikeys said:
birds, what birds. I was talking about another video. You are a plane crash expert and you can not find anything that shows a similar crash. Something that looks like the WTC crash, anything that shows a plane plough through a physical barrier, make a hole, cut through stuff, anything that can do as a benchmark.
Click to expand...

Mainly because planes hitting world trade centers Is thankfully a very rare occurrence.

How about you show us a crash where a laden jet hits a building and does not cause the damage that you saw on 911.
 
Mikeys said:
Dude, it's a video. It doesn't have civilian rights. The prove is in the video. It's self provable. The conspirators admitted the video relates the real story. What more do you want?
Click to expand...


I asked for proof. You've provided none. Your claim is rejected. Next case, please.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom