Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

beachnut said:
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/111WTCaircraftpart1.jpg[/qimg]
Dust for 911 truth.
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/111aircraftpartWTC2.jpg[/qimg]
Aircraft parts, aluminum parts, defined as dust? You might want to stop "debating" 911 and switch to Bigfoot. Your evidence and claims are better suited for a fantasy not based on a real event.
Click to expand...
Assuming parts of fuselage survived the impact and fire, how did it survive the collapse while pretty much anything else turned to dust.
 
beachnut said:
Got to hand it to 911 truth science, fantasy physics and special extra credit insane material science.

At all the accidents I investigated in the USAF, not one of the planes became aluminum dust. How does that happen in your world of fantasy material?
Click to expand...
Good point. Finally.
 
Mikeys said:
Assuming parts of fuselage survived the impact and fire, how did it survive the collapse while pretty much anything else turned to dust.
Click to expand...

Er, no. Doesn't work like that.

beachnut presents strong evidence that contradicts your theory that "aircraft aluminium would have turned to dust on impact".

Your job now is to accept or dispute his evidence, not change the subject. It's the way of civilised debate.

So ... off you go. What about those airplane parts found around WTC?
 
DGM said:
What do you mean by "everything else turned to dust"? Nothing malleable "turned to dust".
Click to expand...
Any other plane that ever crashed wasn't subsequently flattened by a whole bunch of floors coming down on it. The floors that could flatten the tower to dust left the fuselage. Another incredible and counter intuitive glid in this chain of fantastic events. I can take one or two, but when one comes after another and another and another, you need to stop somewhere. A chain of credible events that form nearly incredible accidents happen regularly. When you have a very large number of, say, flights across the world, you are bound to hear of such accidents or have a chance to witness them if you are a frequent flier or work for an airplane company. Here we have a progression of incredible events that end in an accident. Let's assume the accident is just an ordinary one, and there was no political large scale operations that followed. Show me one similar case, just one, not necessary involving aviation.
 
The video uploader guy has had to confront actual on-the-ground witnesses to the plane crashes in the comments section.

He called them liars. Really.

Karmic retribution: surprisingly he has no use for Judy Wood, yet the spam from Wood acolytes there is piling up thick and fast.
 
Mikeys said:
Any other plane that ever crashed wasn't subsequently flattened by a whole bunch of floors coming down on it.
Click to expand...
What's this have to do with....................well, anything?

Mikeys said:
The floors that could flatten the tower to dust left the fuselage.
Click to expand...
This is a fantasy of your own making. Never happened.

Mikeys said:
Another incredible and counter intuitive glid in this chain of fantastic events. I can take one or two, but when one comes after another and another and another, you need to stop somewhere. A chain of credible events that form nearly incredible accidents happen regularly. When you have a very large number of, say, flights across the world, you are bound to hear of such accidents or have a chance to witness them if you are a frequent flier or work for an airplane company. Here we have a progression of incredible events that end in an accident. Let's assume the accident is just an ordinary one, and there was no political large scale operations that followed. Show me one similar case, just one, not necessary involving aviation.
Click to expand...

Nice story but, It really has nothing to do with what we're talking about.

It would help if you stick to the events of the day.

So, what did you mean by: "everything else turned to dust"? You do know they needed heavy equipment to clean up the area, not brooms and vacuums?
 
DGM said:
What's this have to do with....................well, anything?


This is a fantasy of your own making. Never happened.
Click to expand...
The photo shown by beachnut clearly shows fuselage, and a large chunk at that. It might have somehow landed on the bottom in fair shape, but again what are the odds. All concrete was pulverized. What kind of concrete was used there, what density?
 
carlitos said:
Except for the people that saw and videotaped that plane coming.



Please tell me you're just trolling here? Sealed off by gravity? In a "comma" for 10 years?
Click to expand...

He panned right to the towers, stopped and waited. ahahhahahahhahaha
 
Mikeys said:
The photo shown by beachnut clearly shows fuselage, and a large chunk at that. It might have somehow landed on the bottom in fair shape, but again what are the odds. All concrete was pulverized. What kind of concrete was used there, what density?
Click to expand...

Um...that's a picture of the roof of WTC 5. The "chunk" landed there when it shot out the other side of the tower along with a shower of other debris.
 
Last edited:
Mikeys said:
... All concrete was pulverized. What kind of concrete was used there, what density?
Click to expand...

Another lie, all the concrete was not pulverized, most the dust was wallboard (gypsum), and insulation. Once again the truth is known by you and it is...
Mikeys said:
... I am quite unfamiliar with 911. ...
Click to expand...

Light weight concrete, 4 inches thick on a majority of the floors. But then it is expected you have to ask stupid questions because you failed to do the research.
What did you say?
Mikeys said:
... I am quite unfamiliar with 911. ...
Click to expand...

You said all the aluminum turned to dust; was that a lie or a failed WAG?
 
Last edited:
This is just comedy gold.

I would say zero understanding of engineering and science but I would be wrong. Less than zero.

Big fast plan hits wall, bad things will happen. Big nasty horrible things, get over it.

I weep for you if you truly believe this bs. You were failed as a child at school.
 
Mikeys said:
The photo shown by beachnut clearly shows fuselage, and a large chunk at that. It might have somehow landed on the bottom in fair shape, but again what are the odds. All concrete was pulverized. What kind of concrete was used there, what density?
Click to expand...
That photo was on top of building 5 where the piece landed after impact. It wasn't involved in the collapse.

Maybe if you paid more attention to details you wouldn't be so confused. ;)
 
Mikeys said:
The photo shown by beachnut clearly shows fuselage, and a large chunk at that. It might have somehow landed on the bottom in fair shape, but again what are the odds. All concrete was pulverized. What kind of concrete was used there, what density?
Click to expand...

That piece came to rest BEFORE the collapse.


Care to address my lengthy post to you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom