EventHorizon
Atheist Tergiversator
Somebody needs to come up with a Robert Prey drinking game.
Somebody needs to come up with a Robert Prey drinking game.
Hey Rob, did you ever think of doing your song and dance act on stage? Your tap dancing is right up there with the best but some of your comedy needs brushing up on, but not your PDF knowledge, that's pure comedy gold.Excellent. Now try explain that to Jay.
And then we all die of alcohol poisoning.Baloney.
And then we all die of alcohol poisoning.
Horse poop. All the documents you have asked for have been produced. It's your burden to disprove them.
Horse poop. The GOP would gleefully love to impeach a Democratic President. They spent nearly 8 years and $40 million going after the last one.
Your arguments are completely contradictory to reality.
Nonsense. 8 years ago the GOP in the elected congress consisted largely of RINOS.
fraud.Remind me what the basis of your argument was?
"a single page of the PDF file can contain different layers with different content."
What is it about this straight forward statement that you do not understand, Jay?
Legally, an official copy has the same standing as the original.
I like how you just move the goalposts. You said Hawaii refused to stand behind it, and when told, again, that they have multiple times, you begin wittering on about an "exact copy". I'm betting that's about to be proven wrong as well.
He's posted quite a bit more than that, which you've only been able to a)hand-wave as "technobabble" without any evidence, or b)counter with "evidence" from websites which don't actually prove your case. Like you do in #7541, in fact.
And, of course, you refuse to explain why this level of scrutiny was not necessary for any other president, ever. Just the first black guy.
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=808&pictureid=6551[/qimg]
Interesting that you simply latch onto any old statement that seems to confirm your pre-existing beliefs, while ignoring a factually correct and detailed explanation of the underlying technology.
Dcdrac can confirm, if he wishes, that he and I discussed this post privately and that your attempt to recruit him as an ally to your interpretation is not likely to succeed.
I understand every bit of it, as I demonstrated. What I do not accept is your interpretation of it to mean it has any bearing on the Obama PDF.
When you're ready to address the points I raised, let me know. Otherwise kindly redirect your personal obsession toward less disturbing ends.
For starters, bob, "can" not must.
Secondly, you clearly do not understand PDF structure.
You have dropped into an ocean of knowledge here, armed only with ignorance, and the knowing sharks of education are getting peckish.
[Robert ignores several questions]
Sometimes people can't see the forest for the trees -- or simply don't want to. Ya think????
Don't forget the Kool Aid.
"a single page of the PDF file can contain different layers with different content."
Only the "Sharks of Education" could possibly mis-construe such a plain and simple statement. Classic Orwellian DoubleThink.