Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here`s a court transcription of his court appearance on July 11. 2012.
Her Majesty the Queen v Allen Nelson Boisjoli.

.scribd.com/doc/101468841/HER-MAJESTY-THE-QUEEN-v-ALLEN-NELSON-BOISJOLI-2012-July-11#download

Sorry can`t post full address .Just add www

It reads like a comedy sketch:)


A small note adding to my previous post and narrative. This July 11, 2012 hearing occurred between the Provincial Court hearing where Boisjoli was denied bail, and the subsequent confirmation of that order by the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench.

Chaetognath
 
Hi just found this ! Mr Menard admits he`s a comedian:D


://wearechangevictoria.org/2012/09/03/comedy-show-rob-menard-friday-september-7th-2012/

Just add http
 
With loons like that jumping on Menards bandwagon it's no wonder he has decided to become a comedian.
Although he was always a barrel of laughs to me.

After reading that article I wonder if Menards still shouting "freeman on the land buddy" to cops when he's drunk?

My favourite from that link

Freemen are known to refuse to admit their identity, engage in the filing of vexatious documents, and speak in pseudo-legal nonsense.”
 
On September 13, 2011 Boisjoli pled guilty to five of 14 charges that all related to his interaction with a number of Child Services workers and lawyers:
2 x failure to appear offences,
1 x intimidation of a justice system participant conviction
1 x intimidation with threats
1 x criminal harassment
Boisjoli at that time acknowledged inappropriate interaction with the Child Services personnel, which included threatening communications, and liens based on a 'copyright in name' foisted agreement.

The other charges that were stayed by the Crown were a mixture of fighting, harassment and intimidation offences.

This flowed from a disagreement between Boisjoli and Alberta Child Services after Boisjoli's children were seized.

Boisjoli had been in detention prior to the trial. He had not attended earlier hearings. On joint application Boisjoli was sentenced to time served (4 months, 2 days). Judge McNab accepted that result but expressed reservations as to its adequacy.

Unfortunately, that did not resolve the matter. Permanent custody with a foster family was ordered for Boisjoli's children, and Boisjoli was denied further access. That adoption order is under appeal.

Boisjoli subsequently ... was charged with and detained for multiple Criminal Code, s. 423.1(1) intimidation of a justice system participant offences. These are the basis for his current detention.

Boisjoli was denied bail by the Provincial Court, and that order was confirmed at Queen's Bench. In August Boisjoli has made several of what may be called 'habeus corpus' applications at Queen's Bench that have been denied, though their basis is on various Freeman immunity theory schemes that Boisjoli had opted out of being governed.

None of these proceedings are reported.

I hope that helps.

Chaetognath

It is noted that Menard’s freeman epiphany occurred after his 2002 run in with Child Services.

One would think the Fezzed One would have some knowledge of use to offer Boisjoli.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the We Are Change link about Rob's comedy gig:-

" following up with his new initiative of the C3PO – Canadian Common Corps of Peace Officers"

New initiative? Seem he's down to recycling his own ideas as new, not just other peoples :)
 
" following up with his new initiative of the C3PO – Canadian Common Corps of Peace Officers"

I wonder if hes going to reveal the fact that they are called C3PO because of a typo.:)
They were originally called 3CPO (the three C's stood for Canadian Common Corps) and that when they set up the website about it they messed up, must have been a Star Wars fan who did the work for Rob.
 
I wonder if hes going to reveal the fact that they are called C3PO because of a typo.:)
They were originally called 3CPO (the three C's stood for Canadian Common Corps) and that when they set up the website about it they messed up, must have been a Star Wars fan who did the work for Rob.

It could be also seen as "Free CPO" or "Free C3PO"... (free like get out of jali. :D )
 
hahahahah
Freeman-on-the-Land
Robert Menard Presents
EMPOWERMENTALITY
Friday, September 7th,
Vic West Community Centre
521 Craigflower Rd
Victoria BC
Show time 7PM
$20.00 at the door, pay what you can....
With special musical guest!

Hope to see you there!
Freeman-on-the-Land
Robert Menard Presents
EMPOWERMENTALITY
Saturday, September 15th,
All Saints by The Sea Church Hall

Saturday September 15th, 6PM doors, 7PM Show
Includes Roast Beef Sandwiches and other tasty goodies!
110 Park Drive across from Ganges' Harbour.
Saltspring, BC
Show time 7PM
$10.00 at the door, pay what you can....

Hope to see you there!
With special musical guest!

Hope to see you there!
http://public.worldfreemansociety.org/index.php/forum/197-announcements/108037-victoria-bc-show
Wait until the 21st guys, its bound to be free at the rate he's going.
He's like a market trader getting rid of the last of his black bananas at the end of the day.
 
Here's a fresh one, from last week. I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I did. The decision gives a good summary of events and it's clear that this guy threw out all the freeman arguments in the book:

Bank of Montreal v. McCance, 2012 ABQB 537

He did succeed in delaying things several months, of course it would up costing him all the remaining equity in his house which will go towards the bank's legal fees, but maybe that was part of the plan. Freemen don't believe in the value of money all that much to begin with. In theory at least...
 
Last edited:
Here's a fresh one, from last week. I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I did. The decision gives a good summary of events and it's clear that this guy threw out all the freeman arguments in the book:

Bank of Montreal v. McCance, 2012 ABQB 537

He did succeed in delaying things several months, of course it would up costing him all the remaining equity in his house which will go towards the bank's legal fees, but maybe that was part of the plan. Freemen don't believe in the value of money all that much to begin with. In theory at least...

There are some absolute beauties in there but this is my favourite: Investigating precedent from another case
[15] In essence, Klundert's evidence was that as a natural person he had no
obligation to pay taxes because he didn’t owe any. The respondent did not
consider himself to meet the definition of “person” as that term is defined in the
Act. According to the respondent, he had the option to act as a natural person - to
whom the Act does not, in his view, apply, or to submit to the Act as a taxpayer.
Because the respondent considered himself to be earning income in his individual
capacity for himself as a natural person and not as a taxpayer, he did not believe
he was under any obligation to pay income tax.
...
[19] Unfortunately for the respondent, the Act does not distinguish between
persons and natural persons. The definition of "person" in the Act includes human
beings of which specie the respondent belongs.
 
Unfortunately for the respondent, the Act does not distinguish between
persons and natural persons. The definition of "person" in the Act includes human
beings of which specie the respondent belongs.


Ha! The Court admits they think "people" are "money"!!!

spe·cie (spsh, -s)
n.
Coined money; coin.
Idiom:
in specie
1. In coin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom