Moderated Obama birth certificate CT / SSN CT / Birther discussion

[TjW]

So, theoretically, the bank should be able to refuse to cash your check, because, after all, your state-issued ID might be fraudulent.

 

[Rich_C]

So, theoretically, the bank should be able to refuse to cash your check, because, after all, your state-issued ID might be fraudulent.

RP said earlier (in a post moved to AAH) that all American currency is counterfeit, so he probably thinks the bank won't care since they are just giving you counterfeit money anyway.

 

[Hans]

So, theoretically, the bank should be able to refuse to cash your check, because, after all, your state-issued ID might be fraudulent.

Yes I asked him earlier if he checked his DNA and his own birth certificate to see if it is forgery....ya know his parents might not be whom they claim.....


Guys just a reminder you're not having a reasonable discussion with gentleman on a subject of interest. You're dealing with a troll, don't expect him to act like anything other than a troll!

 

[EventHorizon]

Each and every statement here a very thick slice of Baloney.

Another cowardly dodge by Robert. Why am I not surprised?

 

[TheRedWorm]

Another cowardly dodge by Robert. Why am I not surprised?

Because he's the trollingest troll who ever trolled?

 

[Arus808]

So, what you are saying is, the "full faith and credit" clause of the Const. is indeed a license for State officials to commit Birth Certificate fraud???? Is that correct????

oy vey, you really do not understand "Full Faith and Credit" from the Constitution and it shows that you do not understand the task of officially designated authorities by the state, over health records.

 

[Arus808]

Each and every statement here a very thick slice of Baloney.

Seeing as I have not told a lie, and have asked you several times to point them out, and you have failed each and everytime, your "baloney" statement is that, Baloney.

 

[JayUtah]

Because he's the trollingest troll who ever trolled?

Apparently. The best anyone can do these days is to corner him into making outrageous statements like all currency being counterfeit.

 

[KDLarsen]

Apparently. The best anyone can do these days is to corner him into making outrageous statements like all currency being counterfeit.

Or, I dunno, just ignore him?

 

[Robert Prey]

oy vey, you really do not understand "Full Faith and Credit" from the Constitution and it shows that you do not understand the task of officially designated authorities by the state, over health records.

I fully understand a ducked question.

 

[JayUtah]

I fully understand a ducked question.

No, your question makes no sense because it's a begged premise based on your broken understanding of the Constitution. Demanding it be answered is the classic "complex question" fallacy: have you stopped beating your wife?

 

[Robert Prey]

And you can optimise layers

http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/printing-complex-pdfs-acrobat.html

From the cited Adobe url:

"PDF files can contain [B]layered[/B] content if they are created from layered documents by using applications such as Adobe InDesign. As a result, a single page of the PDF file can contain [B]different layers[/B] with [B]different content.[/B]"

Comment: Well, duh?????????

 

[Robert Prey]

Hypothetically then, this line of speculation serves no purpose for the discussion at hand.

Tying in another thread, why should the privacy rights of the POTUS be overridden without due cause?

For the purpose of upholding the Constitution.

 

[Robert Prey]

No, your question makes no sense because it's a begged premise based on your broken understanding of the Constitution. Demanding it be answered is the classic "complex question" fallacy: have you stopped beating your wife?

Nonsense. A theoretical question is theoretical. And simple. Logic 101.

 

[Robert Prey]

Arpaio's "experts" failed voir dire as well. Their evidence is worthless in court because they're not the experts they claim to be. That explains their failure where others have succeeded. When are you going to realize what expertise consists of?
.

Baloney.

 

[JayUtah]

From the cited Adobe url:

"PDF files can contain [B]layered[/B] content if they are created from layered documents by using applications such as Adobe InDesign. As a result, a single page of the PDF file can contain [B]different layers[/B] with [B]different content.[/B]"

Comment: Well, duh?????????

And the PDF contained one layer. One. UNO. Your "experts" mistook object groups for layers. Hence I repeat my question. What is the difference in PDF terms between a layer and an object group?

Further, the conditions aren't met here: the PDF was not created with Adobe tools. What sort of PDFs are exported from InDesign? Do they look like the Obama PDF? Do you know? I do.

 

[JayUtah]

Nonsense. A theoretical question is theoretical. And simple. Logic 101.

You have my Logic 101 answer. Fallacy of the Complex Question. Any answer requires us first to agree with your wrong interpretation of the Constitution. Logic fail.

 

[JayUtah]

Baloney.

Incomplete answer. Please show your work.

 

[Mojo]

Another dodge which means you will not say the clause gives the states license to commit fraud because you know very well it does not.

This is a strawman argument. Nobody has argued that the clause gives the states license to commit fraud.

You are claming that Hawaii has committed fraud, but have supplied no (zero, none, nada) evidence for this.

 

[Robert Prey]

And the PDF contained one layer. One. UNO. Your "experts" mistook object groups for layers. Hence I repeat my question. What is the difference in PDF terms between a layer and an object group?

Further, the conditions aren't met here: the PDF was not created with Adobe tools. What sort of PDFs are exported from InDesign? Do they look like the Obama PDF? Do you know? I do.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. Same goes for this guy. Look familiar?