JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Foolmewunz said:
Because the challenge is bogus. You're making up a rule that everyone has to adhere to and it has no place in scientific enquiry, evidenciary hearings, jurisprudence or critical thinking.

My best single piece of evidence: The Warren Commission Report - all of it.
Click to expand...

Just checking in with this thread to find the correct answer already taken.

If one objects to the Commision Report as a single peice of evidence, then no answer will satisfy the question.

A fully framed video of Oswald shooting Kennedy? How do we know it was filmed in Dallas? That would require more evidence.

If the lone assasin claim were based on any single bit of evidence it would be prone to serious questions.
 
You sometimes you see, hear and speak no evil for the same reason you see no fairies, speak no fairies and hear no fairies. Tinkerbell just wasnt there. And neither was the shooter on the grassy knoll.
 
Zapruder demonstrating what he saw.... this before the film had been processed.
 

Attachments

  • ZapruderHeadWound.jpg
    ZapruderHeadWound.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 8
Cylinder said:
Just checking in with this thread to find the correct answer already taken.

If one objects to the Commision Report as a single peice of evidence, then no answer will satisfy the question.

A fully framed video of Oswald shooting Kennedy? How do we know it was filmed in Dallas? That would require more evidence.

If the lone assasin claim were based on any single bit of evidence it would be prone to serious questions.
Click to expand...


Exactly. Which is why no LN on this board has ever ventured to offer a single piece of evidence.
 
Exactly. Which is why no LN on this board has ever ventured to offer a single piece of evidence.
Click to expand...
Its because single pieces of evidence are not of value by themselves Robert, as was your single piece of evidence (a drawing of Kennedy's head)
 
What those who support the conclusions of the WC have offered, and discussed at length is a totality of evidence, a pattern whose facets verify each other. The rifle, the prints, the photographic record, the films, the bullets, the autopsy and documentary evidence.

Robert has offered no more than his own misunderstanding of these, and contradictory testemony that only proves the pliable nature of human memory.

On a side note, given Roberts stance in the birther thread, and his insistence a sales blurb about Obama is a claim by Obama, I assume we will soon be seeing retractions in this thread to the effect that a book whose cover dishonestly claims a central role for the author in events, should now be seen as a claim by the author (ignoring that the text in the book describes a role that role that very much appears to be central anyway)?
 
Cylinder said:
A fully framed video of Oswald shooting Kennedy? How do we know it was filmed in Dallas?
Click to expand...


Even if Oswald had dashed out of the crowd, lobbed a hand grenade into the limo, and been gang-tackled by the Secret Service, all captured on film by Zapruder and several still photographers, there would be just as much JFK conspiracism today. The narrative would be a bit different (the real Oswald was arrested ahead of time, his CIA double carried out the assassination, and then the real Oswald was killed to silence him), but the conclusions would be identical. Conspiracism always has been, and always will be, about attempting to make the data fit the theory, rather than making the theory fit the data.
 
Robert Prey said:
40 Plus medical witnesses of the same single piece of evidence is proof of conspiracy.
Click to expand...

40>1

Witnesses of evidence, is not the evidence itself.

You haven't supplied 40 medical witnesses.
Those you have supplied you have misreporesented, seemingly based on a false understanding of their statements.

On no level does your claim stand up to scrutiny.
 
SpitfireIX said:
Even if Oswald had dashed out of the crowd, lobbed a hand grenade into the limo, and been gang-tackled by the Secret Service, all captured on film by Zapruder and several still photographers, there would be just as much JFK conspiracism today. The narrative would be a bit different (the real Oswald was arrested ahead of time, his CIA double carried out the assassination, and then the real Oswald was killed to silence him), but the conclusions would be identical. Conspiracism always has been, and always will be, about attempting to make the data fit the theory, rather than making the theory fit the data.
Click to expand...

So conspiracies simply do not exist? Read much history???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom