Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

Aaa you see, the steel in WTC was also high grade, FAIL

Oh? You said you could break glass, you did fail. You forgot to specify what kind of glass.

The WTC steel was strong, in fact, they used different grades for the exterior to increase the strength of the building so the shell would supply the lateral support. Without the shell, the core would collapse.

Flight 175 had 11 times the KE that the WTC was designed to resist if an aircraft impacted. Thus the aircraft not only entered the building but it destroyed 10 core columns. Flt 11 had 7 times the KE, and destroyed 6 core columns. You don't do physics.

When will you retract the lie Flight 175 was made of Aluminum foil?

Are you a no plane person?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FM9FeEgI0Eo

You keep proving you don't do physics. What is your claim on Flight 175?
 
Did the bow turn to dust on impact or did it not? How can a flimsy shell survive an impact like that. KE is one thing and the relative strength and mass of matter involved and how it will subsequently react to an event is another thing. Try to imagine the impact in slow motion. Plug the numbers and do the math. What happens to the aluminum alloy bow when the plane hits the wall with a velocity high enough to crash through steel.
What's a "bow". It doesn't mater. The formula stands. Too bad you skipped out on science class, people might actually have paid attention to you (although you have not said a single thing that would have drawn attention to yourself).

Have you noticed yet, most people nod their heads and walk away from you?
 
Why don't you do the maths for us?

I can't I am just a pony. You claim in every other post you are scientists. If I were one I wouldn't be waiting and instead plugged the the numbers to save the bow. I can not wait to see this miracle.
 
What's a "bow". It doesn't mater. The formula stands. Too bad you skipped out on science class, people might actually have paid attention to you (although you have not said a single thing that would have drawn attention to yourself).

Have you noticed yet, most people nod their heads and walk away from you?

What is his claim? Can't he express his conclusion?

What the heck is a bow? Does he know the nose is fiberglass, or plastic, or material that the weather RADAR can "see" through?

Does he know the nose of 175 never came out of the building, the nose looking object is random debris due to the KE impact blowing out the other side?

Does he know airplanes are not made of Al foil? lol
 
I can't I am just a pony. You claim in every other post you are scientists. If I were one I wouldn't be waiting and instead plugged the the numbers to save the bow. I can not wait to see this miracle.

I am not a scientist, but I do have A level physics. If you post the equations I can follow them. I have not seen anyone claim that they are scientist, although some of them are qualified in various filelds. Convince me that you know what you are talking about by posting the maths or I will be forced to conclude that you are only parroting truther sites.
 
Newton figured the physics out in, when was it, 1666 or so. Here is the TM, three and a half century later, proudly, stubbornly and steadfastly propelling mankind forward by pushing its counter-reality mantra's and off the top of the head opinions. Progress is wonderful.
 
What is his claim? Can't he express his conclusion?

What the heck is a bow? Does he know the nose is fiberglass, or plastic, or material that the weather RADAR can "see" through?

Does he know the nose of 175 never came out of the building, the nose looking object is random debris due to the KE impact blowing out the other side?

Does he know airplanes are not made of Al foil? lol

Ships have bows, planes have noses. Where the idea came from that planes are made of aluminium foil is anybody's guess.
 
Newton figured the physics out in, when was it, 1666 or so. Here is the TM, three and a half century later, proudly, stubbornly and steadfastly propelling mankind forward by pushing its counter-reality mantra's and off the top of the head opinions. Progress is wonderful.

Maybe they have him confused with Fig Newton.
 
I doubt that a few equations will explain the actual event. A computer simulation may be able to do the job if it's accurate enough. (Not an Al Gore hockey stick global warming simulation, please! :D)
 
What is his claim? Can't he express his conclusion?

What the heck is a bow? Does he know the nose is fiberglass, or plastic, or material that the weather RADAR can "see" through?

Does he know the nose of 175 never came out of the building, the nose looking object is random debris due to the KE impact blowing out the other side?

Does he know airplanes are not made of Al foil? lol
Personally I responding for giggles while my ribs do their thing in the smoker

ribs.jpg


Did I say I also have beer at this party? Happy Labor day (to someone I know has labored)

:D
 
NOSE.
The nose is made of fiberglass. The nose did not come through the building. The nose looking thing is debris at a moment looking like a nose, and fooled the 911 truth followers into claiming it was a nose, a delusional claim based on ignorance.
whatever it was it was where the nose would have ended if it was not destroyed by impact. It may have been a leprechaun posing for the nose. The question is what he was doing there where nothing was expected.
 
whatever it was it was where the nose would have ended if it was not destroyed by impact. It may have been a leprechaun posing for the nose. The question is what he was doing there where nothing was expected.

What? That makes no sense. What do you mean? Elucidate please, together with the maths.
 
whatever it was it was where the nose would have ended if it was not destroyed by impact. It may have been a leprechaun posing for the nose. The question is what he was doing there where nothing was expected.
So, you got nothing? (why else would you post this jiberish)
 
Ships have bows, planes have noses. Where the idea came from that planes are made of aluminium foil is anybody's guess.
Ok, replace foil with shell and bow with nose and focus on the actual miracle.
I have forgotten the physics I have never learned in school and can not plug the numbers without extensive research. However, if someone who constantly claim is above me in physics is welcome to do so. Otherwise I will take it as an empty claim.
 
Ok, replace foil with shell and bow with nose and focus on the actual miracle.
I have forgotten the physics I have never learned in school and can not plug the numbers without extensive research. However, if someone who constantly claim is above me in physics is welcome to do so. Otherwise I will take it as an empty claim.

If you never learned physics then why you do feel qualified to make judgements about a plane crash? Equations have been posted here. If you never studied physics then how can you hope to understand them?
 
Last edited:
so you finally are going to admit the front part of the plane was destroyed on impact or you need some more foreplay?
The entire plane was destroyed, but the mass continued and took other mass and accelerated it out the windows, all over the building, damaged 10 core columns, killed many people, and spread jet fuel all over, 66,000 gallons of jet fuel going 590 mph.

Which comes to the point? Why are you showing you don't do physics? What is your point? It does not matter if the entire plane crushes into a mass of parts and jet fuel, that mass is not stopping at the exterior of the WTC, it will pass through the exterior, damage the core and some parts with leave the building and land on the street, a block or two away.

What is your big picture besides destroying physics? Are you a no planer?

Did you find the Al bullets?
 

Back
Top Bottom