Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

Anders Lindman said:
They wanted that kind of angle to make the office fires big enough. They also used thermite, but even with that they needed to weaken several floors.
Click to expand...

They needed the angle to make the equation of imbalance work.
 
Anders Lindman said:
They wanted that kind of angle to make the office fires big enough. They also used thermite, but even with that they needed to weaken several floors.
Click to expand...

Horse poop. Essentially your "theory" is the Illuminati faked hijacking and crashing planes so they would have cover for the explosives - that weren't damaged by the planes' impacts - to bring them down. Then they invented the 3,000 casualties out of thin air.

Why is it every truther theory sounds like it was dreamed up by a not particularly bright 5th Grader?
 
Robrob said:
Horse poop. Essentially your "theory" is the Illuminati faked hijacking and crashing planes so they would have cover for the explosives - that weren't damaged by the planes' impacts - to bring them down. Then they invented the 3,000 casualties out of thin air.

Why is it every truther theory sounds like it was dreamed up by a not particularly bright 5th Grader?
Click to expand...


Well, in ALs case, it's not really his theory. He just finds the most retarded from around the internet and pretends to believe it because he knows we'll respond.
 
Anders Lindman said:
They wanted that kind of angle to make the office fires big enough. They also used thermite, but even with that they needed to weaken several floors.
Click to expand...

i wish i could have been a fly on the wall during the planning phase of the operation...

"ok men, were going to use thermitemate to bring down the towers, but we need to weaken a several floors. any suggestions?

planes?...


BRILLIANT!"
 
Robrob said:
Horse poop. Essentially your "theory" is the Illuminati faked hijacking and crashing planes so they would have cover for the explosives - that weren't damaged by the planes' impacts - to bring them down. Then they invented the 3,000 casualties out of thin air.

Why is it every truther theory sounds like it was dreamed up by a not particularly bright 5th Grader?
Click to expand...

Even if the planes were real, and I don't think they were, but let's assume that, then that would not have been enough to bring the towers down. So they had to use thermite, plus in some way make the steel columns collapse such as with shape charges or something like that.

The shadow cabal didn't have to come up with 3,000 victims. They could just let the media and the government etc fake the victims since they were forced to do a coverup because the public firmly believed the event as it was first presented by the media. To tell the truth after that would have made the authorities, like the Presidency and mainstream media and so on, lose all credibility leading to a collapse of the entire society, with the public filing thousands of class action lawsuits.
 
Voodoosix said:
i wish i could have been a fly on the wall during the planning phase of the operation...

"ok men, were going to use thermitemate to bring down the towers, but we need to weaken a several floors. any suggestions?

planes?...


BRILLIANT!"
Click to expand...

*Interrupts*

"Sir, we don't need to weaken the floors, they are not installed."
"So we don't have to use planes then?"
"Well, not *real* planes."
 
OCaptain said:
There you go again with this "shadow cabal", for which there is no evidence!
Click to expand...

Here is evidence for the shadow cabal in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXBUyezfUOs

Notice first how the firefighter sweeps his arm down to indicate the exact timing for when the camera operator should start moving the camera to the left to exactly catch the explosion in the tower. The plane has been edited into the video later on with computer graphics. So both the firefighter here and the camera operator are members of the shadow cabal.
 
Bell said:
*Interrupts*

"Sir, we don't need to weaken the floors, they are not installed."
"So we don't have to use planes then?"
"Well, not *real* planes."
Click to expand...

Which means that there WERE floors where the planes impacted the towers. Which in turn indicates that the 'planes' are computer graphics insertions, because real planes would not glide effortlessly like a laser sword through several floors of concrete and steel.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Which means that there WERE floors where the planes impacted the towers. Which in turn indicates that the 'planes' are computer graphics insertions, because real planes would not glide effortlessly like a laser sword through several floors of concrete and steel.
Click to expand...

LOL, you don't have a clue what E=1/2mv2You skipped Physics. Not a great idea, but I can teach 99.9 percent of all grade school kids in grades 5 and 6 to understand kinetic energy aircraft can crash through the WTC shell because they have 7 to 11 times the kinetic energy needed. Did you skip a lot of school? Why did you fail to take science courses in school?

You don't do physics, your statement is delusional.
 
Robrob said:
Funny, the no-planes say the same thing about you.
Click to expand...

No-planes divert the issue hence they are more likely to be manipulators. Who cares whether there were planes there or no. They could not have done the kind of damage they are assumed to have done. Their existence doesn't matter. The claim is real.
 
beachnut said:
LOL, you don't have a clue what E=1/2mv2You skipped Physics. Not a great idea, but I can teach 99.9 percent of all grade school kids in grades 5 and 6 to understand kinetic energy aircraft can crash through the WTC shell because they have 7 to 11 times the kinetic energy needed. Did you skip a lot of school? Why did you fail to take science courses in school?

You don't do physics, your statement is delusional.
Click to expand...

So, you claim you have physics calculations for how an airliner can glide through several floors of concrete and steel plus steel columns like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg ?
 
Anders Lindman said:
Which means that there WERE floors where the planes impacted the towers. Which in turn indicates that the 'planes' are computer graphics insertions, because real planes would not glide effortlessly like a laser sword through several floors of concrete and steel.
Click to expand...
They actually could. They were made of indestructibly Panzer that will cut anything at any speed.
 
fitzgibbon said:
Explain the eyewitnesses. Oh...I forgot....everyone who witnessed an impact is in on it and all the rest of us have been fooled except you and Ace Baker

:rolleyes:

Fitz
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. Imagine that you had witnessed first hand how there was an explosion in one of the WTC towers but no plane. Then what will you tell your family members and your friends, who all have seen the plane on television? Would you start ranting about "there was no plane! there was no plane!" and having people you know and people you work with think you had gone completely bonkers?! :confused:
 
Anders Lindman said:
Not necessarily. Imagine that you had witnessed first hand how there was an explosion in one of the WTC towers but no plane. Then what will you tell your family members and your friends, who all have seen the plane on television? Would you start ranting about "there was no plane! there was no plane!" and having people you know and people you work with think you had gone completely bonkers?! :confused:
Click to expand...

So who're the legion who witnessed who're covering? There must be plenty.

And do explain the second impact. You taking a page out of the 'Ace Baker real-time broadcast CGI plane insertoin' playbook?

Fitz
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom