Although I am well past the age to receive this shot, I would have done so if it had been available in the late 60s. One major purpose in males is to prevent the spread to females. Females would contract it from their partner. Females are at risk of developoing cervical cancer when infected with HPV.
So, as a male, or the parents of a prepubescent boy, you have to ask, "do I not bother with the shot and risk passing HPV onto the future person I love and risk watching them go through the pain and distinct possiblity of early death, or do I get the shot and know that I will greatly lower that risk?"
A girl I knew in high school, sister of a friend of mine, died in her 30s of cervical cancer. Her husband was left with young children, they were deprived of their mother. What are the odds that this man would have glady allowed his boy to be given the shot if it were available (a moot point as the boy is now in his 30s).
Those men and women who watched their mothers die of cervical cancer when they were young, what are the odds that they would allow their male offspring to get the shot?
Clayton wishes us well with the vaccines. Ok, fine, yes, we will do well with the vaccines, so will our children and grandchildren.
I wish Clayton well without the vaccines. I wish his desendants well should they not receive vaccines. I certainly will not wish illness upon anyone. That said I know that without them these people are at much greater risk of contracting the diseases the vaccines are designed to counter, and furthermore that these people would become vectors for the spread of those diseases in our ever increasing population.
Here's a thought. There are many people out there afraid of the gov't and supposed shadow gov't and a supposed program to reduce the population of-the USA, Europe, or the world - the theory varies- by such means,among others, as introduction of diseases. That's simply not required. All that is required is a program to strike an irrational fear of vaccines into the populace. This requires little or no involvement of the medical community (which introduction of new diseases would).
This is very hard evidence therefore (at least if one were prone to believing such conspiracy theories) that persons such as the poster known here as Clayton Moore, are disinformationalists in the pay of the NWO's program to reduce world populations.
Its a good plan in that the most probable persons to fall for this disinformation are those with the least education and in the lower income brackets, i.e. the people who also are more likely to utilise social safety net programs, thus they are the most likely to succumb to easily prevented diseases.
