Robert Prey
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Messages
- 6,705
So Robert, any luck with those 5 birth certificates?
The others had a documented past. Obama has no past -- all expunged from the record.
So Robert, any luck with those 5 birth certificates?
The others had a documented past. Obama has no past -- all expunged from the record.
The others had a documented past.
Obama has no past -- all expunged from the record.
The point is the same as exposing a conspiracy to murder the President of the United States -- a personal but patriotic crusade against brainwash.
As did the author of the "Hitler Diaries."
The author of the Hitler Diaries wasn't responsible under the law for collecting, recording, keeping, and certifying the information in them, unlike the State of Hawaii and birth cerificates.
Which makes your analogy not just wrong, but also stupid.
The others had a documented past. Obama has no past -- all expunged from the record.
Mr Prey so far you have proved nothing at all other than you do not understand legal process, the constitution of the USA, how expert evidence works and how pdfs are created.
No, it hasn't been discredited. It's a process like this.
Actual forensic computer imaging expert Dr. Neal Krawetz explains it in some detail here.
It wasn't in error.
.
The others had a documented past. Obama has no past -- all expunged from the record.
But you are not convinced to the degree of 100 percent certitude, and if you are not convinced to that degree, why not just say so?
I understand that lying is routine and common with any government -- especially a criminal government. But it takes a population of mindless sheep for them to get away with it.
I never said I was, and I never said I wasn't.
Because I don't have to say. The only thing that matters is what the State of Hawaii says.
And they say it's real.
But you are not convinced to the degree of 100 percent certitude, and if you are not convinced to that degree, why not just say so?
I'm sorry, but then one must conclude that you yourself are not totally convinced that the document is authentic. That's OK. Neither is Jay.
So that must leave the door open for the possibility even in your own mind, that the document is a fraud.
I'm sorry, but then one must conclude that you yourself are not totally convinced that the document is authentic.
So that must leave the door open for the possibility even in your own mind, that the document is a fraud.
Does this mean you are not one hundred percent certain the document is fake????
I'm sorry, but then one must conclude that you yourself are not totally convinced that the document is authentic. That's OK. Neither is Jay. So that must leave the door open for the possibility even in your own mind, that the document is a fraud.