Moderated Obama birth certificate CT / SSN CT / Birther discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wrong. I gave my analysis and you said "Baloney" and refused to elaborate. You effectively conceded your inability to challenge my interpretation.



Nope. Asked and answered. Repeatedly.

Never asked, merely pointed out but never answered.
 
No. He was anointed. By the liberal media, by Opray Winfrey, and by himself.
"We are the ones we've been waiting for!!!"
He's also the Marxist - in -Chief, the Community Organizer-in-Chief, and in Hillary's alleged words "The Bed-wetter-in-Chief."

I think I'll let Robert Prey answer this post for me.

A shameful ad hominem attack

More ad hominems don't improve your position a single twit.

That's telling 'im, Robert!
 
No. He was anointed. By the liberal media, by Opray Winfrey, and by himself.
"We are the ones we've been waiting for!!!"
He's also the Marxist - in -Chief, the Community Organizer-in-Chief, and in Hillary's alleged words "The Bed-wetter-in-Chief."

All this is ad hominem. Note the difference between what you're doing here, and what people are doing in investigating the qualifications of your so-called experts.
 
No. He was anointed. By the liberal media, by Opray Winfrey, and by himself....
If you say so; you clearly pay more attention to Ms. Winfrey than I do. But your statement is factually incorrect; President Obama was elected by over sixty-nine million Americans, about 53% of the total vote.

I have no use for those who can't get over their hatred for a particular President to the point they try to pretend he's not somehow "real". George W. Bush was elected in 2000 in a close vote that required a Supreme Court ruling to settle the results; that meant he was President, but there were quite a few who tried to delegitimize him. They were wrong then; the birthers are wrong now. The difference is that the birthers also believe one of the most idiotic conspiracy "theories" ever - not because it has any evidence for it, or even makes a lick of sense, but because it fits their worldview.
 
Only losers feel the need to declare "victory."

I didn't and you haven't oh by the way here is the question you keep dodging

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8540495&postcount=6181

I fully understand why you are trying desperately to avoid it but then so do we......

Oh two other comments -

One: if you ever see the 'microfilm'; won't you just declare it a fake too? I mean with all the 'evidence' you believe in how could it be correct?

Two: Since you seem to think POTUS wasn't elected shouldn't you be in armed revolt?

lol
 
Last edited:
Only losers feel the need to declare "victory."

Originally Posted by Robert Prey

How utterly predictable you guys are. You can't even cite a single point, so you throw up your hands, and retreat. Game, Set, Match.

Originally Posted by Robert Prey

Well Robert it seems you cannot seem to remember what you type.....so I guess by your very public outcry you have deemed yourself a loser


Now that IS funny
 
Again, I maintain that the answer to "stupid" (or outdated) laws or Constitutional provisions is to change them, rather than just pretend they don't exist. To ignore certain provisions of the Constitution merely because some find them unfair or or outdated is to set a very bad precedent, IMO.

So is obeying the letter the law even when it conflicts with the spirit of the law.

No. He was anointed. By the liberal media, by Opray Winfrey, and by himself.
"We are the ones we've been waiting for!!!"
He's also the Marxist - in -Chief, the Community Organizer-in-Chief, and in Hillary's alleged words "The Bed-wetter-in-Chief."

I chose to support Obama because I looked at his policy proposals and liked them. That you think he is somehow a Marxist implicates your entire ability to reason as faulty.
 
Otherwise kindly stop playing Baloney games.

You do realize that pretty much everything RP has said in this thread is a game, don't you? He hopes to frustrate liberals by pretending to be a birther and by pretending that he has valid points.


ETA: the appropriate response is to say things like "I found three different Wikipedia pages that say President Obama was born in America!!11!! Let me spell that out for you. Wikipedia says Obama was born in Hawaii in three different places."

You say something silly and then set up a punch line (or dangle a participle) for the next poster. Simple netiquette.
 
Last edited:
You do realize that pretty much everything RP has said in this thread is a game, don't you? He hopes to frustrate liberals by pretending to be a birther and by pretending that he has valid points.


ETA: the appropriate response is to say things like "I found three different Wikipedia pages that say President Obama was born in America!!11!! Let me spell that out for you. Wikipedia says Obama was born in Hawaii in three different places."

You say something silly and then set up a punch line (or dangle a participle) for the next poster. Simple netiquette.

I had been catching the faint whiff of trollery here.
 
You do realize that pretty much everything RP has said in this thread is a game, don't you?

I had been catching the faint whiff of trollery here.

It occurred to me that "Robert Prey" is three junior-highschoolers working on a project for social studies class:.

Our project is to display faulty reasoning on Internet message boards by testing for bias and...

And, uh, fallacious thinking a test for...

A discourse bias with regard to conspiratory...conspicery...ial...

Don't hog the bong, dude.
 
Last edited:
It's attacking the person as opposed to the substance of the evidence. Get it now?????


So, what are you saying; you're allowed to call anyone an "expert witness" but no one is allowed to address the alleged expertise of that witness?

Hey, guess what? I'm an expert witness. I know very little about the technical details of PDF, but that doesn't matter. Everything I say about PDFs now must be considered an unassailable opinion.
 
It's called playing the race card -- a substitute for rational thinking.[post # 6641]


If it looks like excrement, smells like excrement, and has the texture of excrement, then it probably is excrement.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Robert Prey



Originally Posted by Robert Prey

Well Robert it seems you cannot seem to remember what you type.....so I guess by your very public outcry you have deemed yourself a loser


Now that IS funny

Not to mention: how many times has Rouser said "In your heart, you know I'm right". Which is a victory claim he tries to make when his argument gets utterly destroyed - which is always.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom