Personal assaults on Obama

If this is what the right wing has to fight with, I think Obama is safe.:) You forgot to aver that he has big ears and stutters.

And you forgot his hair, it's not black enough for me anymore.
 
Dang! I always vote for the nicest hair, and no handicaps. I'm so glad he finally got with the program. :rolleyes:


images

By the way, look up 10 famous stutterers. Moses and Winston Churchill are among them!:biggrin: I doubt anyone with big ears could possibly be intelligent though.

The right wing is just so much fun, I'm thinking of joining up! Just for a few lulz.
 
1. That's where minority preferences come in.
2. Correct. The point is, a Political Science BA is no certification of intellect.
Citation needed that proves grades are irrelevant for minority students.


I don't deny for a minute that Obama is a smart guy (but very stupid when it comes to education policy). Clarence Thomas has a law degree from Yale, what does that say about an ivy league education? I also graduated from a top school (NYU) and I'm not at all the sharpest knife in the draw. Hmmm, could it be my parents had a lot of money? :rolleyes:
What makes you think Clarence Thomas isn't intelligent (i.e. book smart)? And sure some less then intelligent students get into ivy league schools by way of rich parents or seniority but generally speakings dunces don't receive ivy league educations and certainly don't graduate.


A Poli Sci major does, though. You'd have to spit in the prof's face or defend Republicans to get less than a B.
You mean no one with a political science degree has ever received a grade less then a B? :eek: Link??
 
Evidence of this? I've never seen him use a teleprompter, and the one specific instance I've head him accused of using it, it would seem he wasn't. Saying 'uh' every few words is merely poor public speaking, TONS of Americans do it. It can't always be trained away.

Obama, like most politicians, uses a teleprompter during prepared speeches. His predecessors used them too. Its use says about as much about Obama as his eating food when he's hungry does.
 
Neither do we have any evidence of intellect. Affirmative action explains the facts better than does intellect. Obama has a BA in Political Science from Columbia. Sorry, but that's not much of a credential. No one ever said "I got a D in Political Science. Guess I'll have to change majors to Physics". The man thinks Austrians speak Austrian. He, uh, cannot string uh, three words together without, uh, a teleprompter.

So intelligent people never make brain farts or need help with public speaking?

Heck until last year I didn't know that Sweden had royalty. And I minored in political science.

I don't deny for a minute that Obama is a smart guy (but very stupid when it comes to education policy). Clarence Thomas has a law degree from Yale, what does that say about an ivy league education? I also graduated from a top school (NYU) and I'm not at all the sharpest knife in the draw. Hmmm, could it be my parents had a lot of money? :rolleyes:

Obama came from a wealthy family?

1. That's where minority preferences come in.
2. Correct. The point is, a Political Science BA is no certification of intellect.

What I find interesting is that you assume he is an idiot as a starting position.
 
I'd love to know the names of such "academic" institutions. You may be withholding information that the authorities should have, if you are implying sexual harassment as a policy.

I'd like to know too.

I'd like even one proven example from any one of the universities Obama attended.

What about it MK? You got that, or are you lying to try to get political advantage?
 
Claims of sexual demands for grades. Hyperbole, perhaps...metaphor...??. Just like all the claims about Obama's inadequacies. Most people with a modicum of experience and/or education, even street smarts, can tell when someone is above average in their skills as a public speaker and motivator.

It was obvious that Clinton and Reagan had the gifts that George W. and Romney do not. I don't think too many Obama fans are taking anyone very seriously who does not recognize this ability in Obama. This is why all the "rage, hate, anger" stuff that Romney is spewing about Obama just does not ring true at all. It actually sounds sort of puerile, and misinformed.
 
No. I expected the participants to understand contemporary slang.

Now that it has been explained, I see what you meant. Sort of the old saw,
"It's not who you know, it's who you ****"

It came across as if you had some actual knowledge though.
 
Either way, I'm comfortable in saying that it's an allegation you cannot prove.
I'm not a candidate for office with no accomplishments beyond a PoliSci degree and LLD. Given the insipid economic/political philosophy of the President, as he's explained it so far, and his problems with expressing himself without his teleprompter, it's reasonable to question his one selling point, his supposed intellect. Why not?
 
I'm not a candidate for office with no accomplishments beyond a PoliSci degree and LLD. Given the insipid economic/political philosophy of the President, as he's explained it so far, and his problems with expressing himself without his teleprompter, it's reasonable to question his one selling point, his supposed intellect. Why not?

The President's economic and political philosophy are entirely correct and will be vindicated by history.

That you choose to keep your head in the sand and believe him to be wrong and then use that as evidence that he must have gotten his accolades because of "favoritism" only serves as a condemnation of you.
 

Back
Top Bottom