911 Facts Consolidated

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is what we've been told seemingly every day on virtually every news telecast, every speech, every statement, every policy announcement, every public appearance by every government official since September 11, 2001.
Click to expand...

Clayton Moore said:
ja säker
Click to expand...

So you don't think that's an untruth? You think every government official who has appeared in a news telecast, made a speech, announced a policy or made a public appearance since september 11, 2001 has told everyone that "9/11 is the seminal event of our generation." ?
 
Robrob said:
Why is it truthers invariably link to other sites and never articulate a POV on their own?
Click to expand...

They don't seem capable of formulating their own thoughts. Why do we only get that kind of twoofer here?
 
Clayton Moore said:
ja säker
Click to expand...

You support lies made up by paranoid conspiracy theorists. Lies based on nonsense. The web site is nonsense many claims based on ignorance.

You posted a web site filled with lies to fool people unable to think for themselves. One of countless examples which fooled you. Why can't you figure out 911?
Let it suffice to say that it is physically impossible to fly a 200,000-lbs airliner 20 feet above the ground at 400 MPH. http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_14.htm
Click to expand...
The expert who wrote this, fooled our highest honors history major from USF. An airliner that can't do 400 mph at 20 feet, must be an Airbus, because Boeing jets can do 483 knots.

Flight 77 never was level at 20 feet. The terrorist pilot could not hold altitude, and he crashed.

How did you find this web site filled with lies?

I found your creed!
That all things change but truth, and that truth alone, lives on forever.
Click to expand...
Not living up to your creed.
An avatar inspired by reflection, is ironic.
 
Clayton Moore said:
ja säker
Click to expand...

Oh gee Clayton doesn't agree with me that the time until first lie was 3 sentences but he does not dispute that this was written in 2007, does not address the NIST report and the fact that the author is a professional yoga teacher.

Hey Clayton I'm willing to consider your argument that the first lie was a few lines later! Hee hee!

Can a brother get a laughing dog???
 
16.5 said:
Can a brother get a laughing dog???
Click to expand...

Ask, and you shall receive.

duck-hunt-dog.jpg
 
Clayton Moore said:
Copyright © 2012 9/11 Hard Facts.
Click to expand...

On the WTC7 page he refers to a "recent" book - published in 2006.

On the Twin Towers page he refers to "Dr. Steven E. Jones latest comprehensive, peer-reviewed paper and analysis on this science, "Revisiting 9/11/2001 --Applying the Scientific Method"" - published in May 2007.

F.A.I.L.
 
David Ray Griffin is cited in the link to the website you posted. You, the webmaster, and David Ray Griffin all lose. Forever.
 
Clayton Moore said:
ja säker
Click to expand...


I am sure you imagine replying in Swedish makes your arguments sound better. Sadly no language will. And you forgot a T at the end; its Ja säkert.

But again; thanks for a hilarious thread; you RULE at those. :D
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
LULZ!!!!!!!

Oh mercy, your research skills are KILLER.
Or are you saying that he intentionally lied about the NIST report?

Either way, I love this thread so much already.
Click to expand...

Only if you die laughing.
 
Orphia Nay said:
On the WTC7 page he refers to a "recent" book - published in 2006.

On the Twin Towers page he refers to "Dr. Steven E. Jones latest comprehensive, peer-reviewed paper and analysis on this science, "Revisiting 9/11/2001 --Applying the Scientific Method"" - published in May 2007.

F.A.I.L.
Click to expand...

Because Clayton is to lazy to do his own research, it appear that the link in the Op was posted to the internet no later than November of 2007. It was written
by Billy Konrad a certified Jr. III Iyengar Yoga Instructor now based in France.

This is the kind of rock solid information that Clayton brings to the table.
 
Not to mention the outright falsehoods related to the investigation into the collapse of WTC 7
16.5 said:
Wait you linked to that **** without knowing when he wrote it? REALLY? Wow.

By the way the author seems to be a full time yoga instructor.

Sounds legit.

Another quality *********** thread from Clayton.
Click to expand...

Clayton Moore said:
Copyright © 2012 9/11 Hard Facts.
Click to expand...

jaydeehess said:
Really?? Ok then explain this quote
No adequate official explanation has ever been given for the collapse of WTC 7. In fact, the 9/11 Commission Report failed to even mention its existence. And FEMA, the only government agency to look into its collapse, has stated that while fire damage is their official hypothesis as cause for the building to fall in a perfectly symmetrical free-fall collapse, this hypothesis has, by their own admission, "only a low probability of occurrence."
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
jaydeehess said:
Or this quote:
It would be logical to think that the tell-tale shock wave, 'squibs', internal box-like implosion, freefall speed, and neat footprint rubble pile clearly pointing to a controlled demolition of Building 7 would interest those investigating its collapse. But the 9/11 Commission Report does not even mention its existence. Nor does NIST, the government agency assigned to investigate the collapse of the Twin Towers. Like the 9/11 Commission, they did not mention its existence, its collapse, nor the bizarre specifics of that collapse - which so contradict official accounts.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

If written in 2012 why does the author seem completely unaware of the NIST WTC 7 reports?

Is he simply stupid? Is he deliberatly not telling the truth? Was this actually written before NIST was even given the task of reporting on the collapse of WTC 7.

You choose!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom