911 Facts Consolidated

[Clayton Moore]

Many of the facts are here.

http://www.911hardfacts.com/

Introduction
Natural Skepticism
Reframing the Story
Background and Motive
Historical Precedent
Government Complicity and Intelligence Breakdowns
WTC Building 7
The Twin Towers
Marvin Bush and the Planting of Explosives
Underground Explosions
Evidence Destroyed
Military Response
AA Flight 77
Hani Hanjour and Flight 77's Unexplained Expert Maneuvers
Video Evidence at the Pentagon
The Pentagon
Flight Manifests and Passenger Lists
Flight 93
Bin Laden 'Confession' Tapes
Too Grand a Conspiracy?
The Media, Official Investigations, Debunkers, and other Misinformation
Conclusion
Links
Charlatans and Scoundrels
What can be done?
Note about the Author

Even so they still use "complete collapse" when they should use "almost complete destruction."

Collapse means fall down.

 

[The Big Dog]

Many of the facts are here.

http://www.911hardfacts.com/

Even so they still use "complete collapse" when they should use "almost complete destruction."

Collapse means fall down.

Wow, you linked to something posted before the NIST report on WTC7 was published.

Yo that is some timely ****, bro.

Time to first lie? Third sentence of the introduction.

 

[Clayton Moore]

Wow, you linked to something posted before the NIST report on WTC7 was published.

Link?

Yo that is some timely ****, bro.

Time to first lie? Third sentence of the introduction.

Third sentence?

 

[tsig]

Many of the facts are here.

http://www.911hardfacts.com/








Even so they still use "complete collapse" when they should use "almost complete destruction."

Collapse means fall down.

What a flock of geese.

 

[The Big Dog]

Third sentence?

Wait you linked to that **** without knowing when he wrote it? REALLY? Wow.

By the way the author seems to be a full time yoga instructor.

Sounds legit.

Another quality *********** thread from Clayton.

 

[cjnewson88]

Oh come on Clayton. This entire website is basically a sum up of 9/11 Mysteries. They're still saying Marven Bush was in charge of security at WTC for **** sake. You honestly choose to believe this garbage..?

Edit: Under the Thermite tab:

"civilian demolition crews can also use thermite as primary cutter charges to quickly and efficiently sever the steel support columns of buildings they are intentionally bringing down."

Really? Demolition crews use thermite as primary cutter charges? Or is this where the clever use of the word "can" comes in?..

 

[Clayton Moore]

Wait you linked to that **** without knowing when he wrote it? REALLY? Wow.

By the way the author seems to be a full time yoga instructor.

Sounds legit.

Another quality *********** thread from Clayton.

Copyright © 2012 9/11 Hard Facts.

 

[The Big Dog]

Copyright © 2012 9/11 Hard Facts.

LULZ!!!!!!!

Oh mercy, your research skills are KILLER.

Or are you saying that he intentionally lied about the NIST report?

Either way, I love this thread so much already.

 

[jaydeehess]

Copyright © 2012 9/11 Hard Facts.

Really?? Ok then explain this quote:bolds mine

No adequate official explanation has ever been given for the collapse of WTC 7. In fact, the 9/11 Commission Report failed to even mention its existence. And FEMA, the only government agency to look into its collapse, has stated that while fire damage is their official hypothesis as cause for the building to fall in a perfectly symmetrical free-fall collapse, this hypothesis has, by their own admission, "only a low probability of occurrence."

 

[The Big Dog]

Really?? Ok then explain this quote:bolds mine

Now now, Clayton does not believe in google, whois or wayback machine.

for a 9/11 researcher, the author of the link in the Op seems like a hell of a yoga teacher

 

[jaydeehess]

Or this quote:bolds agian are mine

It would be logical to think that the tell-tale shock wave, 'squibs', internal box-like implosion, freefall speed, and neat footprint rubble pile clearly pointing to a controlled demolition of Building 7 would interest those investigating its collapse. But the 9/11 Commission Report does not even mention its existence. Nor does NIST, the government agency assigned to investigate the collapse of the Twin Towers. Like the 9/11 Commission, they did not mention its existence, its collapse, nor the bizarre specifics of that collapse - which so contradict official accounts.

If written in 2012 why does the author seem completely unaware of the NIST WTC 7 reports?

Is he simply stupid? Is he deliberatly not telling the truth? Was this actually written before NIST was even given the task of reporting on the collapse of WTC 7.

You choose!

 

[jaydeehess]

Now now, Clayton does not believe in google, whois or wayback machine.

for a 9/11 researcher, this guy seems like a hell of a yoga teacher

My mistake perhaps to assume he believes in the web page he actually linked to, from which both quotes above are gleaned.

 

[Clayton Moore]

Wait you linked to that **** without knowing when he wrote it? REALLY? Wow.

By the way the author seems to be a full time yoga instructor.

Sounds legit.

Another quality *********** thread from Clayton.

Try using the cut and past feature. There are many third sentences.

 

[The Big Dog]

Try using the cut and past feature. There are many third sentences.

FACE Palm.

Will do! I'll cut and paste what I wrote in this thread for you!

Third sentence of the introduction

 

[dafydd]

FACE Palm.

Will do! I'll cut and paste what I wrote in this thread for you!

Third sentence of the introduction

You can find that word in a dictionary, Clayton. Another comedy gold thread from you.

 

[beachnut]

Many of the facts are here.

http://www.911hardfacts.com/








Even so they still use "complete collapse" when they should use "almost complete destruction."

Collapse means fall down.

Like most of 911 turth, comic relief. Proof of life that is dumber than you thought was possible.


He is comedy.

A typical example of the common reaction people offer on the subject of 9/11 comes from a professor of physics from BYU. Steven Jones, perhaps the leading scientist actively involved in researching and debunking the government's official 9/11 story

Jones present insane claims, and this is called debunking the government's official story.

In typical cult fashion we have quotes to support the "truth" label for the idiotic liars who fool the dumbed down followers of 911 truth.

"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

— Arthur Schopenhauer​

Wow, 911 truth nuts use quotes to support their efforts.

The quote fixed for 911 truth.

"All truth passes through three stages, here at 911 truth where only lies are produced
First truth is made to be so ridiculous it is believed by those who can't think for themselves.
Second, truth is such a big lie, it is opposed by rational people which makes it a bigger draw for followers of 911 truth.
Third, 911 truth claims are accepted as being self-evident to 911 truth followers, no need to present evidence, it is truth because it is labeled truth."


http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_01.htm

A web site which has all the lies in one place, packaged up for those unable, unwilling to think for themselves.



The author of this web site of woo, is an expert...

I graduated Summa Cum Laude with a 4.0 GPA and highest honors from the History Department at the University of San Francisco in the early 1990s. I also hold two separate graduate degrees.

Lucky for USF, college accreditation is not removed for graduating one idiot with highest honors who believe woo and can't do basic research.

A new expert in woo. I will drop him an email...

Copyright © 2012 9/11 Reality, Beachy Typing Class for those 60 and over.
Copyright © 2012 Of the Copyright ...

 

[Robrob]

Why is it truthers invariably link to other sites and never articulate a POV on their own?

 

[Clayton Moore]

FACE Palm.

Will do! I'll cut and paste what I wrote in this thread for you!

Third sentence of the introduction

That is what we've been told seemingly every day on virtually every news telecast, every speech, every statement, every policy announcement, every public appearance by every government official since September 11, 2001.

ja säker

 

[Grizzly Bear]

So we have government complicity, no-planerism, "debunker-phobia" and a guy that then thinks people care that he is a suma cum laude graduation. Brilliant.... For one, if the guy's really suma cum laude, congrats to him.... he's not demonstrating too many of his skills with his radical views. It's a waste of time to address no planer claims, they debunk themselves. Not laughing.... There's a ton of legit things to go after the "gubmint" for, yet T'ers want to waste time with the paranoids

 

[dafydd]

911 twoofer ''facts''. What will they think of next?