Only a disinfo agent would say that no plane hit the Pentagon

[triforcharity]

The theory is that a 757 flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it. Look at my last post. Watch this part of the video series.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKbT9r-6IPQ

And yet, not one eyewitness (that I recall anyway) states that. Even Pffft's witnesses to North of Citgo ALL say that the plane crashed INTO the Pentagon.

I'm not watching your silly videos.

There are plausible scenarios that would explain that. Take a look at this info.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9632

Can you sum it up in 3-4 sentences? You're basically spamming links.

You don't seem to be looking at the info in my last post. Watch this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88JQL4esHFg

No. Post a few sentences summing up your evidence and conclusions.

 

[cjnewson88]

I posted images, video of AA 77 approaching the pentagon, a link to 136 witnesses, debris, surrounding damage etc, and of course, 88 says it's all fake. No argument here.

Here, for you again 88;

Fake, fake, fake, right?

 

[Robrob]

People who seem to know what they're talking about say it would have been impossible.

Because flying a plane into the ground is difficult?

You're misrepresenting my position. Go back and look at my first post again. I think a craft did hit the Pentagon but I think it was much smaller than a 757.

Oh, that makes so much more sense. Hijack four planes, crash two into the WTC, one into PA then hide the fourth and use a fifth plane to hit the Pentagon...?

The theory is that a 757 flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it. Look at my last post.

And then David Copperfield made it (and the passengers) just disappear? Including the wife of the U.S. Solicitor General?

Yeah...

 

[dafydd]

What happened to the passengers, Freddy? They existed. Did they all disappear voluntarily or did the guv'ment dispose of them?

 

[Robrob]

What happened to the passengers, Freddy? They existed. Did they all disappear voluntarily or did the guv'ment dispose of them?

I predict I know the answer already.

It's hilarious how the CT find it more reasonable to:

1) Hijack a jet, land it somewhere "near" the Pentagon, hide the jet and all of its passengers (forever) and then crash another plane into the Pentagon.

And less reasonable to:

2) Hijack a jet and fly it into the Pentagon.

 

[FatFreddy88]

This ain't the nose of a 757...
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

...and a 757 is too big to fit behind the box in this picture.
http://0911.voila.net/index4.htm
(5th picture from top)

This closes the whole case. Whatever hit the Pentagon wasn't a 757. More info in post #17.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8529151&postcount=17

The idea that this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMCFo8IwSEs

...is just another government damage-control video is perfectly plausible as the simulator info they gave could have easlily been bogus. We can't simply take their word on this.

There are contradictions among the witnesses.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's evidence that they AREN'T "plants", not that they are. If they were government agents, they would all be telling the same story because they would be reading off memorized lines rather than reciting an actual personal experience.

We have the scenario of some of them being government agents and some of them being real witnesses.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=10632
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/witnesses.html#Steve Patterson

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5wkyEDIxTk
(witness info-22:40 time mark)
(passenger info-44:00 timemark)

The theory is that a 757 flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it. Look at my last post. Watch this part of the video series.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKbT9r-6IPQ
And yet, not one eyewitness (that I recall anyway) states that. Even Pffft's witnesses to North of Citgo ALL say that the plane crashed INTO the Pentagon.

Your misrepresenting what the video says to mislead the viewers who don't take the time to watch it. It says the 757 flew out of their sight and they heard the explosion and saw the smoke and just assumed it had hit the building. I urge the viewers to watch the videos I post and not accept what these people say happened in the videos until you see it for yourselves.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk

Plane parts could easily have been planted before and after the crash. See third video above for an explanation of the passengers.

 

[NoahFence]

People who seem to know what they're talking about say it would have been impossible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5zvCdD9D1A


You're misrepresenting my position. Go back and look at my first post again. I think a craft did hit the Pentagon but I think it was much smaller than a 757.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8529151&postcount=17

Seem to know? I'll defer to the people who DO know, thank you.

 

[twinstead]

Well that's the problem right there; Freddy seems to think people know what they are talking about because he agrees with their opinion, not because they actually know what they are talking about.

 

[cjnewson88]

This ain't the nose of a 757...
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

You keep posting this fallacy, I'm going to keep posting this until you respond.

Here, I even made it easier for you;

 

[NutCracker]

I love it how the TM makes progress. It is just heartening.

I predict it will converge onto reality in minus 11 years from now.

 

[1337m4n]

Plane parts could easily have been planted before and after the crash.

In what space of time, sir? There's a major highway right next to the Pentagon that was absolutely packed with traffic that day. What are the odds that not a single one of those people saw anything of the sort?

We have the scenario of some of them being government agents and some of them being real witnesses.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/i...howtopic=10632
http://killtown.911review.org/flight...ve Patterson

Is this from CIT? Do us both a favor and just concede this one. I really don't want to have to dig up the many dozens of posts I spent debunking them. CIT is one memory I don't want refreshed.

 

[twinstead]

"They" work in mysterious ways...

 

[ElMondoHummus]

In what space of time, sir? There's a major highway right next to the Pentagon that was absolutely packed with traffic that day. What are the odds that not a single one of those people saw anything of the sort?

Are you kidding? That's how they did it: Lots and lots of commuters, each carrying a piece of the jet.

 

[plague311]

It's funny that FF88 never answers any questions at all. The only one that he would have to answer is "Why did they not just crash a jet into the pentagon like they did the 3 other sites?"

If that can be logically and intelligently answered than it would go a long ways to making FF88 look credible.

 

[Redwood]

People who seem to know what they're talking about say it would have been impossible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5zvCdD9D1A


You're misrepresenting my position. Go back and look at my first post again. I think a craft did hit the Pentagon but I think it was much smaller than a 757.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8529151&postcount=17

Why did the Vast Conspiracy use a smaller aircraft? For that matter, why not a 747? Budget cuts, maybe?

 

[Redwood]

I posted images, video of AA 77 approaching the pentagon, a link to 136 witnesses, debris, surrounding damage etc, and of course, 88 says it's all fake. No argument here.

Here, for you again 88;


[qimg]http://i962.photobucket.com/albums/ae107/sniperNZSAS/rb211a.jpg[/qimg]

Fake, fake, fake, right?

The agents of the Vast Conspiracy must have done lots of weightlifting, preparing to carry that jet engine from the broom closet where it was stashed, to the Pentagon inner ring hole.

 

[LSSBB]

Why did the Vast Conspiracy use a smaller aircraft? For that matter, why not a 747? Budget cuts, maybe?

It was from flight 19. "They" had been saving it for decades in Area 51.

 

[Reactor drone]

The agents of the Vast Conspiracy must have done lots of weightlifting, preparing to carry that jet engine from the broom closet where it was stashed, to the Pentagon inner ring hole.

That's why they're cylindrical, so you can roll them in to place.

 

[beachnut]

...
Plane parts could easily have been planted before and after the crash. ...

A lie which exposes the fact you don't do RADAR, FDR, DNA, science, math, physics, and more; What do you do? you post lies, you believe lies.

 

[Robrob]

This ain't the nose of a 757...

Right. The conspiracy planted THE WRONG aircraft parts all over the Pentagon?

...is just another government damage-control video is perfectly plausible as the simulator info they gave could have easlily been bogus. We can't simply take their word on this.

Funny how without evidence you automatically reject scientific evidence but immediately without question accept as gospel a fantastical conspiracy without a shred of evidence.

We have the scenario of some of them being government agents and some of them being real witnesses.

And of course the ones whose stories agree with your fantasy are the "real witnesses" and the ones whose stories contradict your fantasies are the "government agents?"

Your misrepresenting what the video says to mislead the viewers who don't take the time to watch it. It says the 757 flew out of their sight and they heard the explosion and saw the smoke and just assumed it had hit the building. I urge the viewers to watch the videos I post and not accept what these people say happened in the videos until you see it for yourselves.

Or you could simply post here what you are claiming and stop telling us to do your homework for you.

Plane parts could easily have been planted before and after the crash. See third video above for an explanation of the passengers.

Yes, they kept a 757 in spare parts secreted inside the Pentagon in preparation for the attack of the much smaller aircraft. After four aircraft were hijacked, three crashed, then the fourth flew past the Pentagon, landed nearby, was hidden and the passengers disposed of while another fifth smaller aircraft actually crashed into the Pentagon. Then the gnomes pulled out the WRONG aircraft parts they had hidden under their desks and salted them about the Pentagon?



Why is it every truther theory sounds like it was imagined by a not particularly bight 5th Grader?