Natural Born Skeptic
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,459
This is a colossally stupid idea. Anything GZ says that conflicts with anything he has already said or will say in the future can be used against him. Some of Sandusky's radio interview with Bob Costas was played for the jury at his trial. And he'll look even worse if MOM keeps interrupting him: "Did you follow TM?" "Don't answer that!" "Did you try to stop him from running away?" "Don't answer that!" "Did you lie to the judge about how much money you had?" "Don't answer that!" "Were you planning to leave the country?" "Don't answer that!" "Have you ever molested a child?" "Don't answer that!" This raises real questions about MOM's judgment.
I'd really like to know what MOM's goal is with these interviews. Fund raising for GZ's legal account maybe? Lots of Faux news viewers out there.
