CIA threatens "Press for Truth" producers over release of new documentary

Childlike Empress said:
As paloalto explained to you at length, he did original research. It stands after months of deflection in several threads. Nothing from the "debunker" side.
Click to expand...

There is a HUGE body of "original research" concerning 9-11 that is contrary to your opinion. You should quit pretending that paloalto has a corner on that market, and that the "debunkers" haven't done any homework at all.
 
Childlike Empress said:
I'm afraid it isn't that simple. If you ask nicely, I'm sure paloalto is willing to explain which piece of the puzzle this article delivered. Again.

If you need further google help, i'm still here for you.
Click to expand...

So then clearly it doesn't say what is claimed. It only works out that way, with the spin doctor's explanation. Gee what a surprise...:rolleyes:
 
Childlike Empress said:
I'm afraid it isn't that simple. If you ask nicely, I'm sure paloalto is willing to explain which piece of the puzzle this article delivered. Again.
Click to expand...

Why can't you tell me? Don't bother, I already know your answer to that one. I read the article there is no mention of a CIA 911 cover up conspiracy, and no mention of the CIA having prior knowledge of the attacks. That is why you cannot point me to it, it doesn't exist.
 
Last edited:
Who said the article contains all the information?

The article contains a piece of information.
 
Robrob said:
And we were supposed to know this - how? :confused:
Click to expand...


I think it is already in the information presented in the OP - the interview with the producers of the documentary which isn't called "Who is James?". And i'm quite sure it was mentioned not only in other interviews (with Kevin Fenton) linked, but also in paloalto's posts throughout the thread. In other words: by paying attention.
 
Childlike Empress said:
I think it is already in the information presented in the OP - the interview with the producers of the documentary which isn't called "Who is James?". And i'm quite sure it was mentioned not only in other interviews (with Kevin Fenton) linked, but also in paloalto's posts throughout the thread. In other words: by paying attention.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, unlike truthers I am not telepathic. It is hard to pay attention to wallpaper length screeds of vague speculation and unwarranted conclusions. How long will it be before the truthers triumph and reveal the truth to a shocked world? Another ten years? Twenty?
 
Childlike Empress said:
I think it is already in the information presented in the OP - the interview with the producers of the documentary which isn't called "Who is James?". And i'm quite sure it was mentioned not only in other interviews (with Kevin Fenton) linked, but also in paloalto's posts throughout the thread. In other words: by paying attention.
Click to expand...

Simple logic would tell you, if twenty posters ask you to explain what it is you are saying - you might not have been as clear as you thought you were. :rolleyes:
 
Robrob said:
Simple logic would tell you, if twenty posters ask you to explain what it is you are saying - you might not have been as clear as you thought you were. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I still have no idea what he is saying.
 
Rply to dafydd

dafydd said:
Why bother? The truth about 911 will be in the history books when we are all dead and gone. The 911 ''truth''' movement has been a dead duck for a long time.
Click to expand...

That is exactly what the CIA and FBI HQ want you to do. They do not want this information to get wide spread dissemination to the American public until the current generation is all dead and gone.

This information all comes almost exclusively from the US official reports from the official US government investigations of the attacks on 9/11. I have even listed the exact US government documents where this information could be found.

I referred to some main stream media documents, the book, State of Denial, the article on FBI Agent Ali Soufan and the Harpers article on Richard Blee, when this new information was compelling and could be found nowhere else, and it was either corroborated or consistent with information that I already had.
 
Yea, that's how to not give the information wide-spread dissemination--provide it in official documents available to any armchair investigator on the internet...
 
paloalto said:
That is exactly what the CIA and FBI HQ want you to do. They do not want this information to get wide spread dissemination to the American public until the current generation is all dead and gone.

This information all comes almost exclusively from the US official reports from the official US government investigations of the attacks on 9/11. I have even listed the exact US government documents where this information could be found.

I referred to some main stream media documents, the book, State of Denial, the article on FBI Agent Ali Soufan and the Harpers article on Richard Blee, when this new information was compelling and could be found nowhere else, and it was either corroborated or consistent with information that I already had.
Click to expand...

How do you know that?
 
twinstead said:
Yea, that's how to not give the information wide-spread dissemination--provide it in official documents available to any armchair investigator on the internet...
Click to expand...

Just think how great it would be if all those armchair investigators dismiss and ignore the information in the official documents.

"9/11 was an inside job"

"all those official documents are full of lies"

Why even bother looking at the documents???

As for the few people who actually take the time to look at those official documents...

They can be drowned out by the stupid conspiracy theories that the "truthers" and "debunkers" are so focused on!!!


;)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom