• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mitt Romney, liar.

BenBurch

Gatekeeper of The Left
Joined
Sep 27, 2007
Messages
37,538
Location
The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics...fter_date_when_he_says_he_left/?p1=News_links

Government documents filed by Mitt Romney and Bain Capital say Romney remained chief executive and chairman of the firm three years beyond the date he said he ceded control, even creating five new investment partnerships during that time.

Romney has said he left Bain in 1999 to lead the winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, ending his role in the company. But public Securities and Exchange Commission documents filed later by Bain Capital state he remained the firm’s “sole stockholder, chairman of the board, chief executive officer, and president.”

Also, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romney’s state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain “executive” in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.

The timing of Romney’s departure from Bain is a key point of contention because he has said his resignation in February 1999 meant he was not responsible for Bain Capital companies that went bankrupt or laid off workers after that date.

<SNIP>

Well, well, well.

Inconvenient truths.

How we deal with them says a lot about a person.

Some people face up to them.

Some lie like a dog strapped to the roof of a moving vehicle.
 
Inconvenient truths.

How we deal with them says a lot about a person.
Politicians lie. I get that. Thing is Romney lies so effortlessly. And being caught in a lie doesn't phase him in the least. "Tell me what you want to hear" should be his motto.
 
I've never once been lied to by a dog strapped to the roof of a moving vehicle.
 
It wasn't a lie, it was a "quirk in the law".

Or maybe it was a hiccup in the space-time continuum. Yeah! Thaaaaaat's it!
 
The timing of Romney’s departure from Bain is a key point of contention because he has said his resignation in February 1999 meant he was not responsible for Bain Capital companies that went bankrupt or laid off workers after that date.

So, was Romney still in charge when Bain went bankrupt or laid off workers or did those events still take place after Romney resigned?
 
New documents dug up over the past couple days do make it seem like he misrepresented how long he was in charge at Bain. He signed SEC filings in July 2000 and February 2001 where he is listed as CEO and President.

The TPM story:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/07no_romney_didnt_leave_bain_in_1999.php

The SEC filings:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/892058/000092701600002483/0000927016-00-002483-0001.txt
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1054290/000092701601001009/0000927016-01-001009-0001.txt

The Boston Globe says they found nine SEC documents and some MA forms and testimony that seem to go against Romney telling the truth.
http://bostonglobe.com/news/politic...n-says-left/IpfKYWjnrsel4pvCFbsUTI/story.html
 
We're talking about one of those Obama campaign lies. It's entirely on-topic.
Actually, what we're talking about is a report by the Boston Globe indicating that "government documents filed by Mitt Romney and Bain Capital say Romney remained chief executive and chairman of the firm three years beyond the date he said he ceded control, even creating five new investment partnerships during that time."

The Romney camp is calling it a "legal technicality" -- but then, US Criminal Code is really nothing but a very large collection of legal technicalities, if you really look at it.
 
that works for religion since over 5000 years, so why not with Obama's campaign?

God and his clergy aren't accountable to voters.

I know I can't be the only one here hoping this story is completely true. Considering that Romney was the least offensive clown the GOP put out this time (a bar so low a chipmunk couldn't limbo under it), it doesn't say much for their integrity if it turns out their front-runner is a felon who bent American workers right over a log in the woods.
 
He signed SEC filings in July 2000 and February 2001 where he is listed as CEO and President.
In fact, he's listed as "Chief Executive Officer, President and Managing Director", the latter also listed under the heading "Principal Occupation".



This thing is going to get legs.
 
In fact, he's listed as "Chief Executive Officer, President and Managing Director", the latter also listed under the heading "Principal Occupation".

This thing is going to get legs.
Was he just stupid and this was a good faith screw up? What would be the bad faith reason for claiming to step aside when he didn't?
 
Was he just stupid and this was a good faith screw up?
Stupid I could see, but a good faith screwup? By Willard Mitt Swiss Bank Account Romney? That's gonna be a tough sell.

What would be the bad faith reason for claiming to step aside when he didn't?
I think the thread title pretty much nails it.
 

Back
Top Bottom