• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Continuation: Discussion of the George Zimmerman case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, you found quotes from way before the current discussion, congratulations!

Clearly triforcharity was talking about the current argument about Frank...

:confused:

this is the very first instance of anyone saying anything about GZ and FT being anything more than friends

nobody claimed they were best friends

Why do you continue to not provide me some quotes from earlier in this thread (as we discussed) that explain their friendship, whatever it may be ?
Evade, Evade, Evade....
 
:confused:



Why do you continue to not provide me some quotes from earlier in this thread (as we discussed) that explain their friendship, whatever it may be ?
Evade, Evade, Evade....

You can't be serious!

tri was clearly talking about the current argument.

Absolutely amazing that this is your out.
 
Amazing that this is a large basis for your position.
Amazing that you are so off base as always. It's one of multiple reasons for my position, and I elaborated further in subsequent posts.
And you accuse people who would call a friend Mr. of being delusional....
Actually I said that if AFTER reading that exchange they don't adjust their position...and also elaborated on that in a subsequent post.
 
crims claim is that they have to prove that M did not go for the gun and that zero amount of proof that Z is a liar about any of the events surrounding that will matter.

The state has to prove, BARD, that Zimmerman's use of force was unlawful and that cetain other statutory elements existed. If the state proves every statement by Zimmerman a lie, they would not have met that burden without having proven what actually happened.

If all the state did was impeach Zimmerman's every word, the defense would have a ready-made directed verdict.
 
Amazing that you are so off base as always. It's one of multiple reasons for my position, and I elaborated further in subsequent posts.

That's odd, because that clearly is not what happened in reality. You can't go back and change your posts now.

You said after people read that post and still believe they are friends then they are delusional.

The large basis of which was Z using the word Mr.
 
Last edited:
The state has to prove, BARD, that Zimmerman's use of force was unlawful and that cetain other statutory elements existed. If the state proves every statement by Zimmerman a lie, they would not have met that burden without having proven what actually happened.

If all the state did was impeach Zimmerman's every word, the defense would have a ready-made directed verdict.

That's odd because NBS is denying that that is what crim's claim was.
 
That's odd, because that clearly is not what happened in reality. You can't go back and change your posts now.
The subsequent posts are above right freaking above your posts. Your games and endless misrepresentations have reached a level of absurdity. Welcome to ignore.
 
Last edited:
Had nothing to do with PP. The witness just admitted it.

He also said that the amounts transferred between bank accounts matched "dollar for dollar" the amounts transferred from Paypal. So it sounds like they just transferred the money straight from Paypal and then from one account to another in the same amounts (ETA: the witness just said that was so that they could trace it).

I thought it was interesting as well that they tried three times to transfer money from Paypal in amounts more than $10,000, but obviously weren't able to due to the limit.
 
Last edited:
Can all of you poo flingers please shut up and watch the bond hearing? You're flooding the thread with nonsense about which poster said what, when. Who cares?

Watch the hearing!
 
But ... please feel free to point out all the posts in the original thread that documented and explored GZ and FT close friendship.

I will withdraw describing the friendship as close, so as not to make any false claims. Although there is at least one poster in the thread who consistently refers to them as BFF's :rolleyes:

Seriously you missed all those??
[...]

All those what ? Posts that provide evidence they are friends ? Yes, yes I did miss those posts. Please, quote some of them. Since you claim I missed them, they must exist, and you must be aware of them, right ?

You can't be serious!

tri was clearly talking about the current argument.

Absolutely amazing that this is your out.

Regardless, you didn't object to the description of close friendship. And , as what appears to start to be you MO, you have completely failed to offer any evidence for your claim. You would rather go around in circles than address the actual issue.
 
Ha, George paid off his school loans!

$11,000 in credit card debt he'd racked up prior to the case.

Just a word to the wise, if you have over ten thousand in credit card debt, don't buy a new truck.
 
I would never believe that people in this thread jumped the gun on something.
You should have seen that poster go on and on about how the judge was pissed ...at the prosecution! during the hearing when bond was revoked.

It was hilarious:http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8335223&postcount=11752

Then went on about how the judge wasn't mad about being led down the primrose path and he even jumped on me because I said the judge called him a "potted plant" - -- accused me of making up that the judge called him a potted plant...yes, apparently I was wrong - it was "palm" -- and

here was his reply --

Originally Posted by crimresearch
It isn't beyond my grasp, which is why I'm calling you on pretending it means something it doesn't, just like I called you on editing out what the judge actually said and pretending he meant something that he never said.

He actually accused me of fabricating the quote from Lester -- Why? because I incorrectly said plant, instead of palm. Can you believe that?


Then he said: "Is this just a game of 'taunt the Mexican' for you?"
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8335215#post8335215

That tells us a lot, doesn't it?
 
Regardless, you didn't object to the description of close friendship. And , as what appears to start to be you MO, you have completely failed to offer any evidence for your claim. You would rather go around in circles than address the actual issue.

Wait, are you accusing OTT of sitting there like a potted palm and letting another poster lead you down the primrose path?
 
I think that strikes me, while watching this Zimmerman walkthrough, is how different he sounds on the NEN call. He sounds like he's slurring his words, and his accent is slightly different. I still think he sounds intoxicated on the NEN call because of this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom