Creationists Argue Nessie Exists

Bloody hell.

Lake Ness
Loch Ness
Lake Loch...

Who cares?!


Creationists still don't realize pointing out a "failing" in evolution doesn't boost creationsim. (Even though Nessie being described as she is in the article isn't, necessarily, a evolutionary "failing")
 
Jaggy Bunnet said:
Which town are you talking about?
Click to expand...

Fort Augustus, which was in economic decline in the 1930s due to the withdrawal from service of the loch tourist steamer, until Nessie was first witnessed by the wife of the local hotel owner.
 
actually Nessie is a serious topic.....

the Illuminati are using HAARP to try and kill Nessie before we can discover it's existence, unlike the NWO who are attempting to drive these precious creatures into extinction with chemtrails before it's reptilian relatives on the moon (that's no moon, it's a space station!) can invade once they get their direct energy weapon that took out the WTC working again.
 
I care, its my home and it is a Loch. Best not to rename somewhere or you may cause confusion.
 
Rolfe said:
I just read that, too. My jaw was on the floor. Who ARE these people?
Click to expand...
I have devised a wonderfully exquisite experiment. Put Rolfe in Mississippi or Louisiana and have her work for a medical insurance company working in the claims department. The experiment is designed to determine if her head will, in fact, explode. :)
 
People, please! Everyone knows, or should know, that lake and loch are interchangeable, because the Police used them that way in "Synchronicity II." Case closed.
 
Nessie is quite compatible with the "Creation". They are both hoax inventions by man.
 
Getting back to the topic, however briefly...

...this whole idea of disproving evolution by argumentum ad nessium is in itself a classic example of "not even wrong". I've never noticed where exactly it's a fundamental tenet of Darwin's theory of evolution that dinosaurs cannot co-exist with modern species. And, looking out of the window, I see a bird fly by...

But enough of this rationalism, and back to arguing over angels and pin-heads. Or, indeed, lakes and lochs.

Dave
 
the sad thing is that Loch Ness does have one very scientifically interesting feature, which is nothing to do with imaginary monsters. Cherry Island (or Eilean Muireach to use its gaelic name) is an excellent example of a crannog, an artificial island created during the iron age. Examples of landscape engineering from thousands of years ago are fascinating.
 
Warrior1461 said:
Then again if you can believe that a virgin can give birth to the Messiah, who can heal the sick(*) (the ones he feels like doing) walk on water, do unlimited fish, bread baskets and kills fig trees, then die and come back to life in 3 days.

You can also believe a large immortal dino that does not need to eat can live in a small lake.

Elivs didn't do no Drugs!
Click to expand...

(*) But not amputee. Gods hate amputee. Never a miracle for them.
 
bynmdsue said:
Is Nessie still a thing? Since I saw an episode of MonsterQuest a few years back claiming it had been killed by global warming, I just kind of figured it was over.
Click to expand...

The tourist businesses around Loch Ness certainly think it is still a thing! (As they have always done.)
 
Wasn't there some monster enthusiast that claimed that Loch Ness was connected by deep underwater passages to the sea?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom