• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trayvon Martin, Vigilante Justice

Status
Not open for further replies.
Q: Did you pursue this kid? Did you want to catch him?

A: No (chuckles)

6:00 mark on part3.

Anyone believe that? After saying "*********** punks" who "******** always get away", "****, he's running", "are you following him? Yeah", he says no, he didn't want to catch him?

This guy is toast.
Yep. You could tell clearly the detectives weren't buying it.

That's why when I posted that clip, and said it was the most damning of all...and then I was berated for *why* it was damning... was just absolute silliness.

ANYONE who listens to that Part 3 tape would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to not understand how damning it is.
 
Yep. You could tell clearly the detectives weren't buying it.

That's why when I posted that clip, and said it was the most damning of all...and then I was berated for *why* it was damning... was just absolute silliness.

ANYONE who listens to that Part 3 tape would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to not understand how damning it is.

I didn't see the bond hearing, but people talked about how unprepared Gilbreath was and what a bad witness he would be. Serino is kind of awesome.

He sounds like someone from central casting. This heartens me. They didn't do a bad job after all and I think Trayvon's killer will pay for what he did.
 
Here's another tidbit, from part 3 towards the beginning. The first address given is NOT 1440, it's 111 Retreat View Circle, Sanford, FL. Google that, and then explain where that fits into George's narrative?

That's the clubhouse. That's where he said he initiated the call from ... why is this a problem ?
 
Last edited:
I didn't see the bond hearing, but people talked about how unprepared Gilbreath was and what a bad witness he would be. Serino is kind of awesome.

He sounds like someone from central casting. This heartens me. They didn't do a bad job after all and I think Trayvon's killer will pay for what he did.

:confused:

Because you listened to Serinos interview (the detective who said everything supports GZ) and you liked his interview, suddenly the entire SPD didn't do a bad job ?
 
:confused:

Because you listened to Serinos interview (the detective who said everything supports GZ) and you liked his interview, suddenly the entire SPD didn't do a bad job ?

Did you listen to that interview? They had gone very deeply into both Trayvon's life and George's. They had parsed his story very carefully and identified inconsistencies. They had a good grasp of the facts and the physical locations. Yes, after hearing that interview, I think they did a much better job than I had been led to believe. Isn't that a good thing?
 
Watching the reenactment, I nearly died laughing at the knuckle bandages on GZs head. Those are NOT butterfly bandages. Perhaps the wife/nurse in training put those on for him. I guarantee you no medical professional did that business. Same with the bandage on his nose. That isn't a piece that goes across the nose, again it's a knuckle bandage.

What a couple of knuckle heads.
 
Knowing what terms mean doesn't make one dishonest.

Insisting terms mean things they don't mean, however, is an example of deep ignorance. And your ignorance is not evidence of dishonesty by me or anyone else.

Most ironic post ever. You were likely proven wrong with at least 4 solid examples. You refuted none of it and responded with one liners and called people names.
 
Most ironic post ever. You were likely proven wrong with at least 4 solid examples. You refuted none of it and responded with one liners and called people names.

Yes, and no one seems to want to touch that devastating interview with Serino and his partner.

Watching that bond hearing again, I recall thinking that they may be exaggerating how much George's story had changed or how they may have minor issues that could make him look guilty in the hands of a skilled lawyer. But hearing that interview with Serino, George is a mess. He was all over the place with completely unbelievable answers. He did that weird whisper thing he did on the jailhouse tapes. And he feigned amnesia whenever he got stumped.

So someone could argue that George was just nervous and wasn't lying, right? But now you have the utter gift, which is his potted palm impression, and wow, he looks like a complete weirdo and grifter.

I wonder if Dershowitz can listen to that interview and still say with a straight face that this guy shouldn't be charged and try to pull that act with a jury.

I voted that he wouldn't get convicted in that other poll post on this subject. While I think he's likely guilty as hell, I thought that he would be a plausible witness and would skate by on reasonable doubt. I do not think this any more. I think he will be convicted on murder two. And mainly because a jury will see his constant lying as an attempt to hide his true actions.
 
This thread has grown lengthy and slow to load so a continuation thread has been started with the most recent page of posts copied over to the continuation thread here.
Posted By: LashL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom