• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

Scott Sommers said:
I have been through this repeatedly. It was trained animals. The important question now is to uncover what kind of animals were used.
Click to expand...

While I agree with your initial conclusion, I think what's more important now is that we investigate the possibility of complicity on the part of the government of Ponylandistan in the 9/11 attacks. It may be that the Care Bears' aggressive actions are completely justified.

Dave
 
dafydd said:
Asking for proof of her ''theory'' really was the frozen limit. We ought to be ashamed of ourselves.
Click to expand...

It is JREF after all. Her problem is failing to understand the true definition of evidence, speculation, and applied physics.
 
I think I might have just gotten myself banned at ATS. But that is okay, that was my intention anyways. I can't believe that after all of these years the "no plane" BS continues. Same old lame "evidence" and same old sick individuals promoting it. So when a moderator told me to be "civil", I told him I had no intention of being civil. Hundreds of people died on those planes, and I'm sick of having their memories smeared and maligned. They died frightful horrible deaths, some of them just children. IMHO, this is just some very sick stuff these folks are perpetuating.

I have a lot of issues with 9/11 and after some hard core research over the years, lingering questions. But the events of the day are pretty clear to anyone who looks at the evidence. 19 Arab (mostly Saudi) wack-jobs hijacked 4 civilian airliners and turned them into kamikaze planes. Nothing new about it, wasn't the first effort, and definitely not unforeseen. But, that in a nutshell is what happened.

But, to have their fellow citizens deny their fate and memory is beyond pale, and IMHO, inexcusable and sick.
 
BCR said:
I can't believe that after all of these years the "no plane" BS continues.
Click to expand...

Continues? It's the cutting edge of Truther Mania. It's where all the best minds are at. It's where everything new and exciting and happening is going on. If you want to be a Truther, you gotta be a no-planer. Doctor Tracy Blevins just got the recipe wrong, but like I've said many times, up until recently on her Facebook, she's had many people encouraging her 'theories'.
 
BCR said:
I think I might have just gotten myself banned at ATS. But that is okay, that was my intention anyways. I can't believe that after all of these years the "no plane" BS continues. Same old lame "evidence" and same old sick individuals promoting it. So when a moderator told me to be "civil", I told him I had no intention of being civil. Hundreds of people died on those planes, and I'm sick of having their memories smeared and maligned. They died frightful horrible deaths, some of them just children. IMHO, this is just some very sick stuff these folks are perpetuating.

I have a lot of issues with 9/11 and after some hard core research over the years, lingering questions. But the events of the day are pretty clear to anyone who looks at the evidence. 19 Arab (mostly Saudi) wack-jobs hijacked 4 civilian airliners and turned them into kamikaze planes. Nothing new about it, wasn't the first effort, and definitely not unforeseen. But, that in a nutshell is what happened.

But, to have their fellow citizens deny their fate and memory is beyond pale, and IMHO, inexcusable and sick.
Click to expand...

BCR, just a question. Is there a certain theory you go with? In other words, what are your issues with 9/11, what are you questioning? Thanks.

Eta: Congratulations on your banning ;) You did it for a good cause.
 
Last edited:
Bell said:
BCR, just a question. Is there a certain theory you go with? In other words, what are your issues with 9/11, what are you questioning? Thanks.

Eta: Congratulations on your banning ;) You did it for a good cause.
Click to expand...

To have a "theory", you have to have adequate data. There is my issue. The government is still withholding and lying about data. I don't care to debate that, but go spend a few years of your life trying to get it from them. Then you'll begin to understand my "issues with 9/11" :D
 
BCR said:
To have a "theory", you have to have adequate data. There is my issue. The government is still withholding and lying about data. I don't care to debate that, but go spend a few years of your life trying to get it from them. Then you'll begin to understand my "issues with 9/11" :D
Click to expand...

How do you know that? I can understand why you don't want to debate it.
 
But if you do, I'll ask the mods / admins to split into a new thread. Thanks for answering by the way.
 
Scott Sommers said:
I don't want to say this is wrong. I just want to urge caution in appealing to movie animals. Some of them are not even real and we would need further examination if an animal team like this was theorized. But I like all these theories. That's what science is about...testing theories...so the more theories we have to test, the more scientific things are.
Click to expand...

We need to test fricken sharks with fricken directed energy weapons attached to their fricken heads.

That's what I think.
 
BCR said:
To have a "theory", you have to have adequate data. There is my issue. The government is still withholding and lying about data. I don't care to debate that, but go spend a few years of your life trying to get it from them. Then you'll begin to understand my "issues with 9/11" :D
Click to expand...

Can you tell us what the nature of these data are? What did you actually ask the government for?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom