• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

Last edited:
http://defense-update.com/20060525_thor-ied.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/...tract-aids-kratos-defense-restructuring-plan/

What do you all think of these energy weapons? One thing that can be concluded is that they exist. Energy weapons exist. They really do.
What do we think? I think your claims are insane, and you don't care how stupid the claim is, you are willing to post it.

<SNIP>

Show which one did 911. How much power was used, and then show how it turns steel to dust and foam. Good luck, you have 50 minutes to complete your essay.

<SNIP>, and you can't show your work to back your insane claims. Idiotic insane claims.

Edited by Locknar: 
Edited, breach of rule 0, rule 12.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
The lower right is the odd one out. Do I win a bong?

Wrong!!

The upper left is Thor, the upper right is Laser Weapons System (LaWS), lower left is Active Denial System (ADS), lower right is World Trade Center (WTC).

Thor is not an acronym so obviously it does not belong. How did you miss that?
 
http://defense-update.com/20060525_thor-ied.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/...tract-aids-kratos-defense-restructuring-plan/

What do you all think of these energy weapons? One thing that can be concluded is that they exist. Energy weapons exist. They really do.

Oh give it a rest Dusty!

Do you honestly think we're going to throw ourselves at your feet and declare you a genius?

Where is your evidence that anything remotely like this (likely to be much bigger) was responsible for destroying a pair of 110 storey buildings?
 
Do you honestly think we're going to throw ourselves at your feet and declare you a genius?

?

That is not what she wants. She is getting the attention that she so desperately craves. Some people give to charity, I respond to Ms. Blevins.
 
Wrong!!

The upper left is Thor, the upper right is Laser Weapons System (LaWS), lower left is Active Denial System (ADS), lower right is World Trade Center (WTC).

Thor is not an acronym so obviously it does not belong. How did you miss that?

Damn, no bong for me.
 
That is not what she wants. She is getting the attention that she so desperately craves. Some people give to charity, I respond to Ms. Blevins.

I agree, today I give 4 TVs to goodwill, two desks, two shelves, lots of clothes, and some typing tutor posts to the expert in 911 fantasy.
 
Oh give it a rest Dusty!

Do you honestly think we're going to throw ourselves at your feet and declare you a genius?

Where is your evidence that anything remotely like this (likely to be much bigger) was responsible for destroying a pair of 110 storey buildings?

I'm not a genius when it comes to energy weapons. But I'm darn good in chemistry! Especially the chemistry of smell. I can almost guarantee I know more about that than anyone else posting on JREF. Anyone want to throw down?

I started this thread because in other threads, the existence of energy weapons was denied. And, by the way, ballistic energy weapons are yesterday's technology. Bullets, bombs, cannons, and even hijacked airplanes flown into targets are all ballistic in nature in that they are physical objects sent on a trajectory to a target.

These newer weapons don't send out physical objects. Rather, they use wavelengths of electromagnetic energy to do the damage. You don't have to be an energy weapons specialist to grasp this much or to do a simple google search to find out what different types of energy weapons are out there and commonly understood already.

There are many new types of energy weapons. You might not have heard of all of them; I certainly haven't.
 
I'm still confused that you believe some massive invisible steel vaporising weapon would just curl a bit of statue..

Why am I even arguing this..

Wrong on almost every count. I don't know that the weapon is:
1. massive (It might have been small.)
2. invisible (I doubt the weapon was invisible.)
3. steel vaporizing? (Absolutely NOT! The steel of the WTC wasn't vaporized.)

Why did it just curl the statue? Because it wasn't directed at the statue. It was directed at nearby buildings. The energy weapon is apparently quite targetable and accurate. Most of the nearby buildings escaped fatal damage, with the Deutsche Bank as a notable exception.
 
There's a problem of dosing here, that is relevant.

The rescue workers inhaled a large amount of iron oxide over an extended time period.

Their lungs are undoubtedly scarred, and they are suffering today. If I am correct, and much of the dust was highly enriched in iron oxide, these people were inhaling iron oxide.

I know I was inhaling something awful. It hurt my sinus passages.

But is incomparably less serious.​




Competent scientists should be able to read an MSDS and understand the contents.​

Dave​
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom