The New York Times chimes in with some claims regarding the SPD investigation. From the lede, we can tell the Grey Lady feels which way the wind is blowing:
Wait - I thought this was more about white boys and priviledge. Hrmm... Oh well, let's look at the claims.
That's because Ms. Fulton and Mr. Martin was not home at the time of the shooting. As the discovery summary shows, SPD had at least four investigators conducting interviews and taking statements the night of the shooting - taking statements from at least 6 different witnesses, taking multiple statements from Zimmerman and collecting evidence from Martin's body.
Yup. Same as the follow up investigation.
And?
Ominous.
This is potentialy a partial oversight, though SFD would probably be interested in assessing Zimmerman's head wounds as a priority. Of course, SFD rescue was documenting the injuries as well as the responding officer.
SPD could not have simply seized the vehicle. They would require a warrant. Once again, we don't really know when officers left the scene and if at they time they have determined that probable cause did not exist to arrest Zimmerman and search his property. Certainly, Florida law prevents SPD from doing anything with the vehicle until that determination is made.
We don't know the conditions during the time of the investigation, but they make a good point here. You can get a good-quality gazebo for a couple of bills.
No probable cause to arrest means no probable cause to search.
The killing of Trayvon Martin here two and a half months ago has been cast as the latest test of race relations and equal justice in America. But it was also a test of a small city police department that does not even have a homicide unit and typically handles three or four murder cases a year.
An examination of the Sanford Police Department’s handling of the case shows a series of missteps — including sloppy work — and circumstances beyond its control that impeded the investigation and may make it harder to pursue a case that is already difficult enough.
Wait - I thought this was more about white boys and priviledge. Hrmm... Oh well, let's look at the claims.
On the night of the shooting, door-to-door canvassing was not exhaustive enough, said a law enforcement official familiar with the investigation. If officers had been more thorough, they might have determined that Mr. Martin, 17, was a guest — as opposed to an intruder — at a gated community called the Retreat at Twin Lakes
That's because Ms. Fulton and Mr. Martin was not home at the time of the shooting. As the discovery summary shows, SPD had at least four investigators conducting interviews and taking statements the night of the shooting - taking statements from at least 6 different witnesses, taking multiple statements from Zimmerman and collecting evidence from Martin's body.
Investigators found no witnesses who saw the fight start.
Yup. Same as the follow up investigation.
Others saw parts of a struggle they could not clearly observe or hear.
And?
One witness, though, provided information to the police that corroborated Mr. Zimmerman’s account of the struggle, according to a law enforcement official.
Ominous.
There was only one photo taken by the police at the scene of any of Mr. Zimmerman’s injuries — a full-face picture of him that showed a bloodied nose — before paramedics tended to him. It was shot on a department cellphone camera and was not downloaded for a few days, an oversight by the officer who took it.
This is potentialy a partial oversight, though SFD would probably be interested in assessing Zimmerman's head wounds as a priority. Of course, SFD rescue was documenting the injuries as well as the responding officer.
The vehicle that Mr. Zimmerman was driving when he first spotted Mr. Martin was mistakenly not secured by officers as part of the crime scene. The vehicle was an important link in the fatal encounter because it was where Mr. Zimmerman called the police to report a suspicious teenager in a hooded sweatshirt roaming through the Retreat. Mr. Zimmerman also said he was walking back to the vehicle when he was confronted by Mr. Martin before shooting him.
SPD could not have simply seized the vehicle. They would require a warrant. Once again, we don't really know when officers left the scene and if at they time they have determined that probable cause did not exist to arrest Zimmerman and search his property. Certainly, Florida law prevents SPD from doing anything with the vehicle until that determination is made.
The police were not able to cover the crime scene to shield evidence from the rain, and any blood from cuts that Mr. Zimmerman suffered when he said Mr. Martin pounded his head into a sidewalk may have been washed away.
We don't know the conditions during the time of the investigation, but they make a good point here. You can get a good-quality gazebo for a couple of bills.
The police did not test Mr. Zimmerman for alcohol or drug use that night, and one witness said the lead investigator quickly jumped to a conclusion that it was Mr. Zimmerman, and not Mr. Martin, who cried for help during the struggle.
No probable cause to arrest means no probable cause to search.

