• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

General Holocaust Denial Discussion Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nick Terry said:
What are the names of the six camps in Poland at which you claim there were no gas chambers?

Let's see if you can manage that much.
Click to expand...

What difference does it make? Do I get a Nonsense Info Merit Badge?

Tell me. Did the inmates go to eat under guard? Did they march/walk around the camps under guard? Was there a guard outside of each barracks?

Were there places the laborers could buy things with their meager wages.
Did a guard go with them and watch them spend their money?
Who watched the inmates when the guards ate their 3 squares?

Did a guard accompany them to the outhouse/latrine?

Were there guards outside the chow hall?

Were there guards inside the chow hall?

How many inmates ate at the same time?
 
Clayton Moore said:
What difference does it make?
Click to expand...

It makes a huge difference.

Firstly, the names of these camps are considered general knowledge and if you do not know them, then you are stuck at a pre-Wikipedia level of knowledge on this topic.

Secondly, your refusal to answer a very simple question which anyone who has posted on these threads should be able to answer straight away, means you forfeit the right to expect anyone to answer your questions.

That's because you are being downright rude.

Put simply, if you do not even know the names of the six camps in Poland then you are so woefully uninformed about this subject that nobody need take anything you say about it seriously.
 
Nick Terry said:
Put simply, if you do not even know the names of the six camps in Poland then you are so woefully uninformed about this subject that nobody need take anything you say about it seriously.
Click to expand...

Have we ever taken him seriously?
 
Nick Terry said:
It makes a huge difference.

Firstly, the names of these camps are considered general knowledge and if you do not know them, then you are stuck at a pre-Wikipedia level of knowledge on this topic.

Secondly, your refusal to answer a very simple question which anyone who has posted on these threads should be able to answer straight away, means you forfeit the right to expect anyone to answer your questions.

That's because you are being downright rude.

Put simply, if you do not even know the names of the six camps in Poland then you are so woefully uninformed about this subject that nobody need take anything you say about it seriously.
Click to expand...

No, it's information that is meaningless, frothy, immaterial, picayune, inconsequential, nugatory, of no consequence, and irrelevant to the fact that there were no gas chambers in Poland and there was no plan to exterminate the Jewish people of Europe.
 
dafydd said:
Have we ever taken him seriously?
Click to expand...

You're here are you not? A whole bunch of you tag teaming anyone who dares stray from the PC Holocaust party line. I doubt if you'd bother if the topic was aliens with half a pinky finger.


Oh you're taking me seriously alright. That's for darn sure.
 
Clayton Moore said:
No, it's information that is meaningless, frothy, immaterial, picayune, inconsequential, nugatory, of no consequence, and irrelevant to the fact that there were no gas chambers in Poland and there was no plan to exterminate the Jewish people of Europe.
Click to expand...

How can you even deny there were gas chambers if you don't know where the gas chambers were supposed to be in Poland?

Logically, you cannot.

Unless you know and demonstrate that you know where the six death camps in Poland were, then you cannot possibly know what evidence might exist about them. And if you don't know what evidence exists about them, you cannot deny the camps.
 
Clayton Moore said:
You're here are you not? A whole bunch of you tag teaming anyone who dares stray from the PC Holocaust party line. I doubt if you'd bother if the topic was aliens with half a pinky finger.

Oh you're taking me seriously alright. That's for darn sure.
Click to expand...

People here have made the mistake of assuming you are serious when it's now quite clear that you're not.

If you are unable even to name the six death camps in Poland, then you clearly know absolutely nothing about the subject.
 
Nick Terry said:
People here have made the mistake of assuming you are serious when it's now quite clear that you're not.

If you are unable even to name the six death camps in Poland, then you clearly know absolutely nothing about the subject.
Click to expand...

It would be like learning Klingon to discuss Star Trek. It's just not necessary.
 
Clayton Moore said:
It would be like learning Klingon to discuss Star Trek. It's just not necessary.
Click to expand...

No, more like watching Star Trek to discuss Star Trek. A basic knowledge of the subject matter at hand is required in order to hold any sort of discourse. It's clearly obvious at this point that you don't.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Really? Over 500 posts so far this month?

Changing the subject because Team Holocaust is getting their respective BUTts kicked?

You ignore the concept and cause of random acts of violence.


Once again you portray an intricate weave of German paranoia. When will you learn that there only 24 hours in a day? You make the camp life into a nonsensical soap opera.
Click to expand...

That's just personal attacks and incredulity. You still haven't explained the big difference between the Holocaust and any other genocide. You don't even acknowledge the posts mentioning such parallels. You can't even explain why you aren't questioning why the Soviets didn't revolt.


Clayton Moore said:
...
The literature and testimonies that structured the Holocaust was rotted wood that the Holocaust historians no longer mention in their litanies.....
Click to expand...
You mean like the account mentioned two posts above yours?

LemmyCaution said:
Well, he implied they were sent to Treblinka for labor, although he doesn't explain of what kind and for whom: Then again, in one of his more bewildering gnomic attempts, he said that people weren't sent to such camps at all:
It's kinda like being asked where 3 or 4 or 6 million went when they arrived at the camps when they never arrived in the first place.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Clayton Moore said:
Yes that's right, there were no camps at all. Thanks, I forgot to mention that.
Click to expand...
It's kind of sad that I can't tell whether you're being sarcastic or using a straw man.
 
LemmyCaution said:
...
This, in turn, raises another legitimate question concerning the other deniers on this thread: are they so ignorant also of the historical work they want to deny that your ignorance escapes them, or are they so mendacious that they let it roll as good times negatin' and obfuscatin'?
Click to expand...

I think it's the latter. I've pointed out the double standards several times, and they just ignore it. It's kind of like how Ergo will defend even WTC Dust's ridiculous theory of foamified metal, and can never seem to decide whether explosives or thermite or both were responsible.


Clayton Moore said:
What difference does it make? Do I get a Nonsense Info Merit Badge?

Tell me. Did the inmates go to eat under guard? Did they march/walk around the camps under guard? Was there a guard outside of each barracks?

Were there places the laborers could buy things with their meager wages.
Did a guard go with them and watch them spend their money?
Who watched the inmates when the guards ate their 3 squares?

Did a guard accompany them to the outhouse/latrine?

Were there guards outside the chow hall?

Were there guards inside the chow hall?

How many inmates ate at the same time?
Click to expand...
You're Gish Galloping because you don't know. You still haven't said whether you accept that that the guards were armed in the first place. You are trying to create the appearance of asking rhetorically, but you honestly don't know.

Saaad.

Clayton Moore said:
It would be like learning Klingon to discuss Star Trek. It's just not necessary.
Click to expand...
No, it would be like saying the Enterprise didn't have an Irish transporter operator, yet refusing to say which Enterprise.

(Next Gen, O'Brien.)

It's like saying you want no cheese on your burger, but never ordering a burger.

In fact, what you have done is the equivalent of trying to watch Star Wars while actively refusing to learn who this Kenobi guy is. He can't be important to the plot, you say, but you can't honestly say that unless you know what role he has in the plot.
 
Clayton Moore said:
dOCTOR sPOCK?
Click to expand...

Good call.

See, the character is actually called Spock, and Doctor Spock was a big name paediatrician of the same era. But we're not discussing Star Trek. My goof here would be worthy of endless ridicule in a thread about Star Trek. It's bad enough here.

Yet it's as nothing compared to what you're now doing. You're unable or unwilling to even name six death camps in Poland and declare airily that such knowledge is irrelevant to the discussion in a thread about the Holocaust.

Quite clearly, it's not irrelevant. If you got one of the names slightly wrong, that's one thing. If you cannot even remember them, then what on earth are you doing in this thread except wasting people's time?
 
Nick Terry said:
no, it'd be like learning the names of Captain Kirk and Doctor Spock. To discuss Star Trek, you need to know those names. To discuss the Holocaust, you need to know the names of the camps.
Click to expand...

You and your buddies never discuss the Holocaust lies such as the Last Days and the diamond defecater.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom