This is not the April Stundie nomination thread

Nick Terry said:
not just 'name the Jew' but count 'em too. A barking mad antisemite way back in 1952 invented a fake Jewish demographer named...wait for it.... Listojewski. Tellingly, this fabrication (no such scholar has ever been identified) has been swallowed by nearly a dozen different antisemitic writers since then.
Click to expand...

Nick Terry said:
It gets worse. The knuckledragger who came up with this gem styled himself C. Leon de Aryan.

:dl:
Click to expand...
I know these aren't Stundies but I think they'd nonetheless be appreciated here.
 
fourtoe said:
MaGZ linked to this metapedia, which I have not heard of. In their 'did you know..." section, the first link simply reads:

(source, just scroll down and look to the right)
[qimg]http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/77452_o.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Jeez did you read the rest of them? it's just a barrage of crazy!!
 
fourtoe said:
MaGZ linked to this metapedia, which I have not heard of. In their 'did you know..." section, the first link simply reads:

(source, just scroll down and look to the right)
[qimg]http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/77452_o.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

BravesFan said:
Jeez did you read the rest of them? it's just a barrage of crazy!!
Click to expand...

I am too familiar with metapedia thanks to MagZ about a year and a half ago. Its a neo-Nazi wiki, so yeah, pretty crazy.

I seem to recall they even have an article on the Blood Libel, well not an article discussing the libel, but an article presenting it as fact.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Discussion of 9/11 Coincidences.
Coincidences are irrefutable. They need no facts. They happened. PERIOD.
After a while too many coincidences become irrefutable evidence.
Click to expand...
For certain definitions of "after a while" and "too many" and "evidence."

Clayton Moore doubles down:

Clayton Moore said:
That's what dictionaries are for.
And you don't understand the premise of the thread,

Too many coincidences occurring within a relatively short time frame demands that the alleged coincidences were in fact planned occurrences.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust disagrees with your opinion, but respects your right hates you, considers you an enemy and thinks you're evil.

WTC Dust said:
If you disrespect a scientist by using a derogatory name,
nobody should respect what you have to say about that scientist.

Even Steven Jones, a man I consider the enemy of the United States,
I basically don't disrespect in a personal way. I hate him. I think he
is either evil or scarily out of touch, but probably evil.
Click to expand...
 
BravesFan said:
Jeez did you read the rest of them? it's just a barrage of crazy!!
Click to expand...
What I find interesting is how tame their 9/11 Attacks page is. Of course their "see also" section links to crazy articles but so does the Wikipedia article, albeit not nearly as crazy and probably a little more sourced.

Also, here's the first picture on Barack Obama's wiki page:
http://nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2009/01/images/officialportrait.jpg


*

Here's the one on the Metapedia Obama page:

http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/d/d7/Obama_at_Wailing_Wall.png




hahahhahahahhahaha.


*here it is on Wikipedia.org, that picture is huge though.

Edited by LashL: 
Changed hotlinks to regular links. Please see Rule 5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fourtoe said:
MaGZ linked to this metapedia, which I have not heard of. In their 'did you know..." section, the first link simply reads:

(source, just scroll down and look to the right)

[URL]http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/77452_o.gif[/URL]
Click to expand...

Can we nominate this from their hatchet job on Albert Einstein?
"In his writings, Einstein makes several wrong predictions of "new physical phenomena" such as the prediction that clocks will work at a faster rate when placed in a weaker gravitational field, a prediction that is obviously wrong as for example an hourglass will work at a slower rate when placed in a weaker gravitational field"
​
Nazis are sooooooo stupid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fourtoe said:
Here's the one on the Metapedia Obama page:

[qimg]http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/d/d7/Obama_at_Wailing_Wall.png[/qimg]

hahahhahahahhahaha.
Click to expand...



Holy ****, that guy next too him looks just like Cleon with a beard!

Maybe there's something to this after all!
 
tsig said:
Libraries do not exist for some.
Click to expand...

Well, if you think about it, many modern conspiracy theorists do their research exclusively online. I wonder if this is why the quality of conspiracy theory is so poor these days; everybody just goes straight to the Internet to get their talking points and don't actually bother to research anything, even conspiracy theory books.
 
thedopefishlives said:
Well, if you think about it, many modern conspiracy theorists do their research exclusively online. I wonder if this is why the quality of conspiracy theory is so poor these days; everybody just goes straight to the Internet to get their talking points and don't actually bother to research anything, even conspiracy theory books.
Click to expand...

Most good public libraries also have web sites, with outstanding electronic resources, many available nowhere else, or only at great expense.
 
thedopefishlives said:
Well, if you think about it, many modern conspiracy theorists do their research exclusively online. I wonder if this is why the quality of conspiracy theory is so poor these days; everybody just goes straight to the Internet to get their talking points and don't actually bother to research anything, even conspiracy theory books.
Click to expand...

and yet, as has been shown a thousand times, internet CTs are absolutely awful at googling and fail to locate the most readily available information, over and over again....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom