PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
If he did, in fact, do that, then TM is on solid grounds no matter what because, remember, the Stand Your Ground idea applies to TM as well as GZ. If some guy is following him for no apparent reason and then the guy came up to him and started to give him a ration of **** then TM could rightfully claim to feel threatened and would be within SYG even if he did initiate physical action.
In which case you could say both were right to do what they did, though I seriously doubt that even under SYG it is acceptable to visciously attack someone for following and yelling at you.
The problem one faces here is even if you go with TM attacking because he feared for his life, that doesn't then nullify GZ fearing for his without realising why TM attacked him. If I think you are coming to kill me, so I pull and knife and charge you causing you to pull a gun and shoot me, my belief that you were going to kill me doesn't nullify your right to act in self-defence against my attack. Likewise even if TM did believe that GZ was going to attack and rob him, that belief does not nullify GZ's right to defend himself against any attack.
