Anything is possible. This primary has been anything but predictable. Even if it only served to elongate the primary process, it puts pain on Romney.I did vote for Santorum in the primary, for exactly this reason. But surely, by now you must have known there was no chance of him getting nomination?
Yes, that is a scary thought. It's too bad he couldn't keep the GOP infighting going a bit longer, but I'll grudgingly accept a fair chance of a Romney presidency over any chance of a Sanatorium...I mean Santorum presidency.Yes well. Hell yes way.
He may have been "for more likely to lose to Obama," but that would still give him a small chance of winning. In in my book, a nonzero chance of a "President Santorum" is way too *********** high.
I very much disagree:I don't like either Santorum or Gingrich, but at least Santorum appears to have personal integrity. I think he actually believes the stuff he says. I don't trust Gingrich at all.
A politician who mouths slogans about duty and sacrifice while guzzling caviar, or about family values while boffing young pretties, is a simple thug and can be trusted -- to follow his own interests. But one who really believes in Christian theocracy (or in Marxist utopia for that matter) for the good of the people is far worse.C.S.Lewis said:Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
The OP misspelled "dripping".
I very much disagree:
A politician who mouths slogans about duty and sacrifice while guzzling caviar, or about family values while boffing young pretties, is a simple thug and can be trusted -- to follow his own interests. But one who really believes in Christian theocracy (or in Marxist utopia for that matter) for the good of the people is far worse.
I think Romney will pick Ron Paul for running mate...
Don't ask me. I don't think he is qualified to be dog catcher.AJM8125: Ewww
Randfan: What cabinet position could even Santorum believe Santorum is qualified for?
AJM8125: Ewww
Randfan: What cabinet position could even Santorum believe Santorum is qualified for?
I don't like either Santorum or Gingrich, but at least Santorum appears to have personal integrity. I think he actually believes the stuff he says. I don't trust Gingrich at all.
The Onion is way ahead of you on this one.
"I mean, with the other guys, you can dig into their past and find at least some shred of rational thinking, even if they're cynically downplaying it now," Gallardo continued. "But I get the sense Santorum is speaking nothing but his completely unfiltered thoughts. I know it's weird to say this about a politician, but I sort of wish he were lying to my face at least a little."
Please tell me he actually said that. [qimg]http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a176/julphotobucket1/LOL.gif[/qimg] What an idiot.
Say what you will, but now I'm forever deprived of the headline I want to see this November:
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/Headline.jpg[/qimg]

He's "faithful to his wife and seven kids." That implies... no... I won't go there.Now there will never be an appropriate use for this video![]()