• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rich_C said:
What difference does it make whether the arm is stretched forward or vertical? No one has mentioned the shadow of the arm.

The rifle and stick are that same angle. To say anything else is either a lie or hopeless self-delusion.
Click to expand...

No. The arm stretched forward betrays a dropping of the stick to make the shadow "work". A 2-dimensional analysis of the angle does not account for the dip in the stick. And of course the angle of the sun is completely different from 133B.
 
Garrison said:
When testimony contradicts physical evidence you have to dismiss the testimony. Also given your lack of credibility, owing to making easily debunked claims, your stance on this issue carries no weight.
Click to expand...

Anyone can make a debunking "claim." But that is very different from actually debunking the claim. Obviously.
 
Tomtomkent said:
In your opinion. But then I can see through key holes. Or the gaps in floorboards. In point of fact, looking from a small hole through to a larger one and seeing the light beyond is often easier than the oposite. You do seem to read what you want into such quotes inspite of the limited information they actually contain.
Click to expand...

In the heat of the assassination and Clint Hill climbing aboard the Limo, a 'see-through" keyhole type wound is hardly plausible.
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
Anyone can make a debunking "claim." But that is very different from actually debunking the claim. Obviously.
Click to expand...
Especially to the CT claimant, who hand waves away any credible evidence that doesn't fit their preconceived theory. In this mind set there is no possibility of being debunked. Fortunately, most people aren't CTists, and know a debunking when they see it.
 
Robert Prey said:
Depends on how contrived is your diagram:
Click to expand...
Exactly, seeing as I posted a photo looking straight down, and you posted an illustration drawn at some arbitrary angle and height...not to mention there's no way to determine if the drawing is properly scaled or proportioned to the real Dealey Plaza.
 
Robert Prey said:
In the heat of the assassination and Clint Hill climbing aboard the Limo, a 'see-through" keyhole type wound is hardly plausible.
Click to expand...

You DO realise that regardless of which end was closer to him, exit or entry, to see through the wound instead of into it, he would have to look through both ends?

And besides i pointed out despite your claim it is possible to see through smaller holes than the entry wound. How large do you think an entry wound is?
 
Robert Prey said:
Anyone can make a debunking "claim." But that is very different from actually debunking the claim. Obviously.
Click to expand...


Yes it is but in this case irrelevant because your ludicrous claims about the behaviour of light and shadow have been debunked several times over.
 
Robert Prey said:
Perpendicular shadows, yes. Two shadows of the same nature, one perpendicular, one horizontal adds up to fraud. Obviously.
Click to expand...

Robert, which post shows the true shadow???? Which ones are fakes????



Oops! Two questions! Oh well, put on your big boy pants and answer.

LOL.
 
Robert Prey said:
The challenge was made on another JFK board and some guy claims he actually went to the Neely back yard, at the proper time of day and year and said he was just about to get the proper shadow refraction when the owner kicked him out. Oh, don't you just hate it when that happens.
Click to expand...


How dense are you Robert?

What is the proper day month and time the photos were taken?

Oh wait, you can't tell us? Gee imagine that.

Of course that is the point. YOU CAN'T DO A REPLICATION. You don't know the sun angle.

All you can do is guess.

Geez, don't you hate it when that happens.
 
Robert Prey said:
Nothing impossible about the shadow so long as you contrive a different sun angle. Pic 133b shows the shadow of the fake Oswald at nearly 12 o'colck. This model's shadow is more like 9:30 to 10 o'clock. Obviously.
Click to expand...


LOL! Your arms getting tired from all that handwaving yet?
 
Robert Prey said:
And you have no evidence that Thompson refuted his own conclusions based on the Originals which he had not seen.
Click to expand...

Changing horses. I accurately reported what Thompson is on record as having said. You refuse to consider that evidence and you refuse to provide better evidence. Now you're trying to add new arbitrary conditions that you say Thompson should have satisfied. Is there any way in which you won't cheat?

Further, am I ever going to see a retraction and apology from you for having wrongly accused me of lying?
 
Originally Posted by Robert Prey
Computer expert Tom Wilson explains it all for you in Living Color in "The Men Who Killed Kennedy."

infocusinc said:
Oh gosh...you keeping finding more crackpots by the second....
Click to expand...

Tom Wilson spent 30 years with US steel developing his computer imaging process to discover product imperfections. He has been recognized as an expert witness in Federal Court murder cases involving gunshot wounds.

Infocsinc's definition of "crackpot" -- Anyone who has an opinion that differs from Infocsinc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom