• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Roosevelt's Rotten Record:Communism, Treachery, Betrayal

Long ago when I was in the Army, USAEUR actually, we often went on FTX and CPX, and once on REFORGER. We always had a PCI of our TA50 including our LBE, ALICE, MOPP etc. by our dickhead starched BDU LT, who I also had to drive in a CUCV (with the RAWLS turned on on post or in a bivouac area) after doing a PMCS of course. My MOS was 31V so I had to deal with VRC, GRC, PRC, RATT, VIC, and COMSEC gear. Later on I was the TOC commo guy, so I had to carry a CEOI. And at least one MRE a day in the field! And I'm sure I've missed quite a few of our acronyms :D

Well damn I actually know many of those still. When I use to teach at FAS I use to write the meanings of the acronyms on the teaching boards in pencil - impossible to see from the students point of view but that allowed me to point to the item in question and read out what it meant to them - in the days before powerpoints
 

I should explain that the exercise, in English was called something like

Corps staff level exercise without troop units

That got translated into German who then past it onto some French speaking Belgians who translated it into Flemish - where it then went to Denmark and then by magic to the French who would just be involved supernumerary like in the exercise....

It was their French translation of the Danish translation, etc that came out PENIS
 
CTs all seems to suck at maths. If we are 99.99% that the mainstream view is the correct one but there is a 0.01% chance the conspiracy theory is true(being generous because I didn't want to type to many decimal places) that does not make the explanations equal.
 
CTs all seems to suck at maths. If we are 99.99% that the mainstream view is the correct one but there is a 0.01% chance the conspiracy theory is true(being generous because I didn't want to type to many decimal places) that does not make the explanations equal.

 
At least, that's what you've been told.

Surprise!


Do you really live life thinking that any information from any source is untrustworthy and thus the scenarios you have fabricated with your imagination alone are just as likely as reality?
 
Last edited:
Do you really live life thinking that any information from any source is untrustworthy and thus the scenarios you have fabricated with your imagination alone are just as likely as reality?
I don't believe this is the case. He reserves the right to dismiss any evidence on the basis of if he likes it. The source doesn't matter.
 
Do you really live life thinking that any information from any source is untrustworthy and thus the scenarios you have fabricated with your imagination alone are just as likely as reality?

Why, should I trust what the government says instead and be a government truther?
 
Why, should I trust what the government says instead and be a government truther?

This might come as a surprise to you but information that history derives from isn't all from government sources. But if you were paying attention and not living in your delusions you would have become aware of this fact in any one of the dozens of times it's been explained to you.
 
Posts since SHC was asked to back up his claim: 23

Posts in which SHC backed up his claim: 0
 
Why, should I trust what the government says instead and be a government truther?

Where did he state a source of the information? You really do have poor reading skills.

Seriously poor reading skills. Your whole evil government routine is wearing pretty thin.

There are many sources for the facts pertaining to the attack on PH but your imagination is not one of them.
 
There are many sources for the facts pertaining to the attack on PH but your imagination is not one of them.

Only one source knows the full and complete truth, though, and that's the U.S. government. All your other "sources" are working with an incomplete collection of evidence, and are therefore merely speculating about what really happened.

Nothing you have to say will change that.
 
Only one source knows the full and complete truth, though, and that's the U.S. government. All your other "sources" are working with an incomplete collection of evidence, and are therefore merely speculating about what really happened.

Nothing you have to say will change that.
Except for the fact everyone there was not the US Government.

:rolleyes:
 
Only one source knows the full and complete truth, though, and that's the U.S. government. All your other "sources" are working with an incomplete collection of evidence, and are therefore merely speculating about what really happened.

Nothing you have to say will change that.

The "truth" that you want to believe only exists in your imagination.
 
So only the government knows the complete truth?

And we can't trust anything they tell us?

How convenient.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom