Oo! oo! oo! Waves hand in the air.. Please sir me sir!! I know that one!!
Sorry, no help from the audience.
Oo! oo! oo! Waves hand in the air.. Please sir me sir!! I know that one!!
Add to the attack on PH you also had the nearly simultaneous attacks (about a 10 hour time difference) on the Phillipines (a US protectorate), and you have a causus belli - whether the attacks were a surprise or not.
It does flag up his basic ignorance, all the 'provocation' was going in the Atlantic. And I'm quite sure he won't be able to provide the date or name for the first US Navy ship sunk during WWII, taking the invasion of Poland as the start.
OR that two American battleships were sunk by the Germans prior to Pearl Harbor.![]()
*points at Spitfire*"Ooh, ooh, ooh! Mr. Kotter! Ooh, ooh, ooh!"
The Italians thought they had sunk an American Battleship or two during the war. There was a conspiracy in Italy after the war when the Battleships thought to have been sunk were seen to be doing quite well....conspiracy solution, claim that the Americans had rebuilt them!
They got at least on British BB, IIRC.
Ah two actually - for awhile at least
HMS Queen Elizabeth, sunk by Italian frogmen in Alexandria harbor, Egypt December 18th 1941 with loss of 9 crew. Raised, repaired and returned to duty.
HMS Valiant, sunk by Italian frogmen in Alexandria harbor, Egypt December 18th 1941. Raised, repaired and returned to duty.
They got at least on British BB, IIRC.
Corrected my post. Also one of the very first rules of engagement state very clearly "You have the right to defend yourself against attacks or threats of attack" which would cover launching a preemptive strike against a fleet in your territorial waters when you have actionable intel that they are going to attack your fleet and resources.Again, from the top, self-defense is not an act of agression even if the attacker hasn't launched the first shot or if the first shot hadn't landed.
Now, SHC what is it with this? Why are you so gung-ho about "He was looking for any reason to get into the war at any cost"? It wouldprepareappear from my perspective that the oppostite was true.
The commander Grossi thought to have sunk a battleship "Maryland" class, in the first case, and in the second a battleship "Mississipi" class.
For these events the commander Grossi was decorate with Gold Medal and had two promotions, the Fascist propaganda had the occasion to take advantage the situation with much clamour.
In realty, off to Brasil, Grossi attacked the cruiser USS Milwaukee, and near Freetown the predestined victim was the simple corvette HMS Petunia without to hit the targets.
In the Post War, however, when these facts had knowed, numerous polemics began that don't end not even when the committee of inquiry ascertained officially the realty on the 1962.
In realty the commitee of inquiry considered the commander Grossi in perfect good faith and the valutation errors was warranted for the occasions of the night attacks.
On the 1943 the Barbarigo was changed in submarine to shipping precious materials to and from the East.
The Barbarigo was sunk, by air attack, during the first misson of this type.
Any "evidence" that Pearl Harbor was a LIHOP could be applied even more effectively to the Phillipines. They saw that attack coming from miles away, and completely bungled their defense...even with their best general in charge.
So, according to CT logic, it HAD to be on purpose. Only problem is...why?
LIHOP, borrowed from 911 'truther' threads it goes with MIHOP Make It Happen
It really wouldn't matter. We could have a diary entry from FDR saying:
and it would just be dismissed as FDR just covering up his knowledge of the attack.