As soon as you show yours.
No again the burden of proof lies with you, if you wish to overturn the accepted view of Roosevelt you have to do the work.
As soon as you show yours.
Sorry, what does all this have to do with FDR?
No, burden of proof lies with you. You don't get to be right by default.
A lot, actually, since Roosevelt was the concentration camp president and our country took a step backwards toward outright barbarianism after that. The stuff that followed - carpet bombing of women and children, chemical, biological, and nuclear testing on human beings - was just a natural regression.
By that logic, Vietnam, Watergate, Iran-Contra et al. are suitable for discussion in the "FDR" thread? Seems unwieldy.
When did FDR do "chemical, biological, and nuclear testing on human beings"?A lot, actually, since Roosevelt was the concentration camp president and our country took a step backwards toward outright barbarianism after that. The stuff that followed - carpet bombing of women and children, chemical, biological, and nuclear testing on human beings - was just a natural regression.
When did FDR do "chemical, biological, and nuclear testing on human beings"?
You can support this, right?
When did FDR do "chemical, biological, and nuclear testing on human beings"?
You can support this, right?
The Tuskegee syphilis experiments were being conducted all throughout the Roosevelt administration, and those experiments certainly qualify as biological.
Next?
Do you actually feel this answers my question?The Tuskegee syphilis experiments were being conducted all throughout the Roosevelt administration, and those experiments certainly qualify as biological.
Next?
And FDR knew about this? Don't bother answering.
Sure, why wouldn't I? He was the C-in-C. Why? Are you arguing that he didn't have knowledge? That his administration had no control over or knowledge of what subordinate departments were doing?
Do you figure the government was just out of control?
The Tuskegee syphilis experiments were being conducted all throughout the Roosevelt administration, and those experiments certainly qualify as biological.
Next?
Prove he knew.
Back to the beer for me.
If he knew, and did nothing, he was complicit.
Highlighted the word that's tripping you up. If, the biggest two letter word in the English language. And you have to provide evidence for this 'if', too, if you want people want to take you seriously.
I think you'll find that you are wrong about that. Along with a great number of things.Either way, I've got you.
SpringHallConvert said:If he knew, and did nothing, he was complicit.
If he didn't know, he was effectively the figurehead of a criminal, racist, out-of-control government conducting cruel biological tests on the nation's most oppressed citizens
There were/is/will be elements within the government that will be operating outside the law and outside of the president's approval.
But seriously what are we talking about now? Pearlharbor still? The droping of the A-bombs? The illegal testing on American citizens?
There are almost always elements in any sufficiently large enough groups that'll be working towards their own agendas. This is fact, but it does not make the whole system corupt.You're starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist here. Elements within government operating outside the law?
This has been explained to you repeatedly, but that wasn't an inside job. Could it have been avoided? Yes, which makes it even sader still.SHC said:I wonder if something like that could have happened on 9/11.
These would be the very same Tuskegee experiments that we have evidence for and that the government failed to succesfully cover up by any chance?SHC said:You responded to a post focusing on the Tuskegee experiments. You know, our government using its own citizens in dangerous biological tests? Tests in which they were being deliberately deceived?
Either way, I've got you.
If he knew, and did nothing, he was complicit.
If he didn't know, he was effectively the figurehead of a criminal, racist, out-of-control government conducting cruel biological tests on the nation's most oppressed citizens
So, take your pick, pal.