• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC Dust Study Feb 29, 2012 by Dr. James Millette

They published what they felt best presented their case with the space limitations they had.
Really? Space limitations? That's why they haven't published the results of the analysis they claim they did over three years ago?
 
Gage says this a lot too. He often claims nanothermite can go both hush-a-boom and silent incendiary. What evidence is there for this? Or are you just being a sheeple?

Good god, newson. You haven't even read the wiki on nanothermites?
 
Really? Space limitations? That's why they haven't published the results of the analysis they claim they did over three years ago?

Yeah. It's called scientific publishing. Heard of it?

Obviously they felt the DSC test was more significant than the FTIR they did. They didn't feel the need to publish the FTIR. They probably still don't, since no scientific paper has yet appeared challenging their findings.
 
No. Demonstrate you've done some reading first.

I read the wiki. It's not very large. Says nothing about nanothermites use as a highly explosive, or even mildly explosive, material.

Feel free to link something that shows you're not just a sheep.
 
I think one of your bedunker colleagues can straighten you out. I wouldn't waste my time.
 
Its not hard. Just go to "references" on the wiki page & find the one that contains the information that was asked for.

Why are you telling me? Newson's the one who thinks nanothermite is a single chemical entity.
 
I think one of your bedunker colleagues can straighten you out. I wouldn't waste my time.

So that's a no for you providing any evidence that proves the repeated claim that nanothermite can be engineered to go bang and fizzle?

Right, you're a sheep, I thought so.

baaaaaaaa
 
Last edited:
Why are you telling me? Newson's the one who thinks nanothermite is a single chemical entity.

Not entirely, I am aware it can be a combination of different elements, however one would have thought they would DSC'd the closest resembling one if they were trying to make a point.. I guess they couldn't find one close enough to match.

I'd still like to see evidence that it can be engineered to go boom and fizzle though ergo. Feel free to prove you're not a sheep any time.
 
Why are you telling me? Newson's the one who thinks nanothermite is a single chemical entity.

No, he asked for evidence of a claim that he even spelled out & you are failing to provide it.
 
Not entirely, I am aware it can be a combination of different elements, however one would have thought they would DSC'd the closest resembling one if they were trying to make a point.. I guess they couldn't find out close enough to match.

I'd still like to see evidence that it can be engineered to go boom and fizzle though ergo. Feel free to prove you're not a sheep any time.

Jon Cole has shown that simple thermite can go boom and fizzle. You think a nanothermite can't?

Why are you even asking this? This is not the subject of the thread. Are you trying to deflect from the fact that I debunked every single one of your tiresome, parroted counterpoints?
 
Saying somebody did it with another material is not evidence ergo. Regardless, it is not on topic with this thread. I shall begin a new one. See you there.

Are you trying to deflect from the fact that I debunked every single one of your tiresome, parroted counterpoints?

omgz look, ergo is now a bedunker just like the rest of us!! hehe he wishes..
 
Last edited:
This maybe should be stundied.

Newson thinks Harrit and Gage wrote the wiki on nanothermites! :D

And no one else in the world, no other scientists or chemists have been able to get in there and correct their information!! Inside job!! :D
 

Back
Top Bottom