The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

Tuck that tail and run, why don't ya?

Before you let the proverbial door hit you on the ass on the way out, can you bother to explain why 9/11 couldn't possibly have been an inside job when high-ranking officials of our military leadership believed it to be possible to carry out a similar attack in 1962? After all, they wouldn't have written the plan down and submitted it up the chain of command if they didn't think it was possible.

Can you or any of your government truthbot automatons explain?

Absolutely. Written loads of such orders/plans/missions and passed them up/down the chain. Also sat and listened to plenty. Some carried out, some laughed at as being to0 brazen. Nothing unusual whatsoever. Welcome to the real world of military planning by Officers/Snco's/Jnco's trying to make a name or perhaps basing their orders on tactics/scenarios that have been used by the military the world over for generations. War games often based on previous wars/battles. British Cavalry Officers especially enjoy the finer detail. I have personally attacked Rourkes Drift more times than I care to remember. A few Ghurkhas present maybe, but not a Zulu in site. Real world. You wouldn’t get it because you didn’t get some in. You don't get 911 for lots of reasons, mainly ignorance and stupidity.

Have you looked into Swift Sword 2? Planned for years before taking place......then….wooooooo. lol. Real World ......try it.
 
...I have personally attacked Rourkes Drift more times than I care to remember.....
I don't think there is a main highway bridge near Sydney that I have not demolished at least once. (Except the big one - being in the middle of the CBD area of Sydney it is of little military significance for any likely combat scenario.)

..and, naturally, we watched "Zulu" at least once per year. :)
 
Absolutely. Written loads of such orders/plans/missions and passed them up/down the chain. Also sat and listened to plenty. Some carried out, some laughed at as being to0 brazen. Nothing unusual whatsoever. Welcome to the real world of military planning by Officers/Snco's/Jnco's trying to make a name or perhaps basing their orders on tactics/scenarios that have been used by the military the world over for generations.

Ah, but there's the rub. Operation Northwoods wasn't just written up and submitted by a bunch of imaginative, low-level guys trying to make a name for themselves, it was signed off on and submitted by the JOINT CHIEFS! Again, the JOINT CHIEFS. These are the top military advisors to the Secretary of Defense and President. Operation Northwoods wasn't just some remote contingency plan, it was submitted for approval by the very top military leadership of our country.

For those of you who can't seem to connect the dots, this means that our senior, most informed military leaders believed that it was within the capabilities of the U.S. military and CIA to carry out a fairly large-scale false flag terror attack inside the United States and deceive the American people into supporting a war against Cuba. This was all the way back in 1962.

So, if such an operation was possible in 1962, why couldn't it have been possible in 2001? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Does anyone know if Ferris came to school today?
 
I don't think there is a main highway bridge near Sydney that I have not demolished at least once. (Except the big one - being in the middle of the CBD area of Sydney it is of little military significance for any likely combat scenario.)

..and, naturally, we watched "Zulu" at least once per year. :)

Did much of mine on the Rhine or Wiesser ;) Dastardly plans hey. lol.

Hoorah for the CRE .....Ubique.
 
Ah, but there's the rub. Operation Northwoods wasn't just written up and submitted by a bunch of imaginative, low-level guys trying to make a name for themselves, it was signed off on and submitted by the JOINT CHIEFS! Again, the JOINT CHIEFS. These are the top military advisors to the Secretary of Defense and President. Operation Northwoods wasn't just some remote contingency plan, it was submitted for approval by the very top military leadership of our country.

For those of you who can't seem to connect the dots, this means that our senior, most informed military leaders believed that it was within the capabilities of the U.S. military and CIA to carry out a fairly large-scale false flag terror attack inside the United States and deceive the American people into supporting a war against Cuba. This was all the way back in 1962.

So, if such an operation was possible in 1962, why couldn't it have been possible in 2001? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Does anyone know if Ferris came to school today?

I know better chump. Still got the sand in me desert boots & S10.

The military planners produced as scenario for Swift Sword 2 which was a mock invasion of Oman by a small and desperate country, given the fictional name Alawham (Arabic for fantasyland), intent on resolving its own economic crisis by seizing Oman’s oil fields. Wooooooooooooo. Get a grip of that truthers. Lol. Planned and executed with the British gubmits approval.


“Within days, the aggressor forces were approaching their strategic goal: the Omani oil fields... But the Omani military regrouped, and after fierce fighting stopped the Alawham forces in their tracks, pushing them into a pocket of occupied territory west of the coastal city of Khaluf. An uneasy cease-fire was brokered by the UN, which called for military assistance to help Oman reclaim its land. With US forces tied up in operations around the Pacific Rim and several European countries preoccupied elsewhere, it has been left to Britain to step in.”

“On or around October 15 the cease-fire will be broken, probably by an armoured incursion across the cease-fire line. As the forces clash in the desert, the island-state of Alkhayl [Arabic for dream-world], located 800 nautical miles off the coast, will step in to support its beleaguered ally Alawham, with which it has a defence treaty. Amphibious assault craft will mount a landing on the beaches just north of the city of Duqm. What had been a small-localised war will suddenly turn into a conflict that threatens the security of the whole region. Over the following two weeks tanks will race around the desert, ships and submarines will engage in hostile manoeuvres, and the airforce will fly numerous bombing runs on strategic targets.”

Those military planners are scheming arnt they. Lol. Trying to make the exercise more true to life by including a range of political difficulties, such as government ministers getting jittery about “mission creep” and creating a simulated press corps, who will decide which side is winning the propaganda war. Working closely with the media to manipulate public opinion is thus made an integral part of the modern army’s training exercises. Dastardly deeds by a gubmint. lol.


“The planners have had to take into account how the operation will be perceived by the outside world. Even the wording of the ‘road to war’ scenario has been carefully written so as not to offend any of Britain’s allies. God forbid the French or the Americans take umbrage at the suggestion they refused to get involved.”

Despite such concern for allied sensibilities and those of the Middle Eastern regimes, the fundamental premise of the operation is to test out Britain’s ability to assert its global interests independently.


Kinda puts Northwoods in with Harry Potter. Lol. Real world. Nothing unusual. Get some in ya halfwit.
 
Nice non-answer. Good job, government truthbot.

Done my bit in the real world chump. Been there done it for real. Nothing unusual whatsoever. It's me ya gotta convince. It aint happnin. Never will.

Ya got nothing. Ya live in a basement and wear a tin hat. Ya sprout non- sense based on your imagination and the words of idiots. We know it. You know it. Get a life man. Get some in. You could have had a degree by now. Infact, you could have had 3 degrees by now. Never mind......lol.
 
Did much of mine on the Rhine or Wiesser ;) Dastardly plans hey. lol.

Hoorah for the CRE .....Ubique.
Yup. RAE Reservist here. Mostly "Supplementary Reserve" - Construction Squadrons in Eastern Australia which are sponsored by the major public sector utilities - Water/Sewer in my case, Roads, Railways, Harbours and Ports. So the technical expertise came from Civil occupation and we trained to use that expertise wearing a cam. suit and carrying weapons. Strategic role was to give a rapidly deployable communication zone resource which could be called on at short notice. But that presumed outbreak of conventional warfare. Not likely these days so the roles have been reconfigured since I retired circa 1985.

Funny thing was that us water types were better at building roads than the roads mob. And the roads mob laid water mains faster than we could. :D
 
Yup. RAE Reservist here. Mostly "Supplementary Reserve" - Construction Squadrons in Eastern Australia which are sponsored by the major public sector utilities - Water/Sewer in my case, Roads, Railways, Harbours and Ports. So the technical expertise came from Civil occupation and we trained to use that expertise wearing a cam. suit and carrying weapons. Strategic role was to give a rapidly deployable communication zone resource which could be called on at short notice. But that presumed outbreak of conventional warfare. Not likely these days so the roles have been reconfigured since I retired circa 1985.

Funny thing was that us water types were better at building roads than the roads mob. And the roads mob laid water mains faster than we could. :D

Sorry OZ, seems a fly needed swatting first.

That's engineers for ya. Can turn our hand to just about anything. Didn’t we teach the artillery a thing or two. Lanyard an all ;)
 
Ah, but there's the rub. Operation Northwoods wasn't just written up and submitted by a bunch of imaginative, low-level guys trying to make a name for themselves, it was signed off on and submitted by the JOINT CHIEFS! Again, the JOINT CHIEFS. These are the top military advisors to the Secretary of Defense and President. Operation Northwoods wasn't just some remote contingency plan, it was submitted for approval by the very top military leadership of our country. (My bolding)

Who then turned around and handed the Joint Chiefs their asses on a platter.
 
Tuck that tail and run, why don't ya?

Before you let the proverbial door hit you on the ass on the way out, can you bother to explain why 9/11 couldn't possibly have been an inside job when high-ranking officials of our military leadership believed it to be possible to carry out a similar attack in 1962? After all, they wouldn't have written the plan down and submitted it up the chain of command if they didn't think it was possible.

Can you or any of your government truthbot automatons explain?
yes but what does this have to do with 9/11?
 
Last edited:
Tuck that tail and run, why don't ya?

Before you let the proverbial door hit you on the ass on the way out, can you bother to explain why 9/11 couldn't possibly have been an inside job when high-ranking officials of our military leadership believed it to be possible to carry out a similar attack in 1962? After all, they wouldn't have written the plan down and submitted it up the chain of command if they didn't think it was possible.

Can you or any of your government truthbot automatons explain?
I would laugh at your puerile taunts, but your bluster has about as much potency as the proof of a 9/11 inside job you've posted. Which is to say none.

What does make me smile is that your precious Operation Northwoods actually reinforces the OP. Now that's comedy.
 
Has Mr. Ideologue realized yet that the reason we don't think a 9-11 inside job was possible is because there's no evidence to support it, and he thinks it WAS an inside job simply because somebody brought up a plan once, and the government is evil?

Somebody puts the "Irrational" in "Irrational ideologue" indeed.
 
Has Mr. Ideologue realized yet that the reason we don't think a 9-11 inside job was possible is because there's no evidence to support it, and he thinks it WAS an inside job simply because somebody brought up a plan once, and the government is evil?

Somebody puts the "Irrational" in "Irrational ideologue" indeed.

It's not unsurprising that this particular troll hasn't attempted to produce a shread of evidence to support an inside jobby.......or any alternative for that matter.

As is the norm, this troll knows full well that all and any resource available to him will invariably be his downfall.........as we know that each and every resource/link he proffers will result in another shot in the foot for the TM.

The remnants of the TM are experts at producing stuff that confirms that 19 terrorists carried out 911. Ask Shure. He is the current king of contradiction.
 
Has Mr. Ideologue realized yet that the reason we don't think a 9-11 inside job was possible is because there's no evidence to support it, and he thinks it WAS an inside job simply because somebody brought up a plan once, and the government is evil?

There's also no evidence to support an independent, outside job either.

Somebody puts the "Irrational" in "Irrational ideologue" indeed.

Yes, that would be you guys in the Government Truth Movement. You believe, without evidence other than that which was collected and provided to you by one of the primary suspects in a criminal case, in something you can't prove. In other words, it's even worse than being your standard religious nutter.
 

Back
Top Bottom