The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

And yet, people directly associated with AQ have been tried and convicted in a COURT OF LAW........

Curious that is......
 
Hmmm, I wonder why there was no evidence. Is it because there really was no evidence, or is it because there was evidence, but our government made sure we didn't find out about it?

In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, who would have been responsible for investigating any potential links between Al-Qaeda and a State agency of, for instance, the U.S. government? Would it not have been an agency of the U.S. government, like the FBI perhaps? If so, would it not be reasonable to assume that the FBI would conceal incriminating evidence against the U.S. government in the interest of national security? Imagine the civil unrest that would have occurred had it come out that the 9/11 attacks were organized by senior members of the U.S. government and military.

Contemplating such a scenario is both inconvenient and uncomfortable for the government truth squad, but it truly must be done by all interested and concerned citizens of the U.S.

Why stop at the USG?

China, Russia, NK, Iran, Pakistan, whatever.
 
Hmmm, I wonder why there was no evidence. Is it because there really was no evidence, or is it because there was evidence, but our government made sure we didn't find out about it?

In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, who would have been responsible for investigating any potential links between Al-Qaeda and a State agency of, for instance, the U.S. government? Would it not have been an agency of the U.S. government, like the FBI perhaps? If so, would it not be reasonable to assume that the FBI would conceal incriminating evidence against the U.S. government in the interest of national security? Imagine the civil unrest that would have occurred had it come out that the 9/11 attacks were organized by senior members of the U.S. government and military.

Contemplating such a scenario is both inconvenient and uncomfortable for the government truth squad, but it truly must be done by all interested and concerned citizens of the U.S.


In other words, your moronic religion is unfalsifiable. No evidence whatsoever for involvement by the US Government?. Well, that just proves that the thousands of people involved in the investigation covered up the crime of the millennium for whatever reasons you want to pull out of your ass without a single one coming clean. And thus you don't have to alter your religious beliefs no matter what. Truly pathetic.
 
Last edited:
And yet, people directly associated with AQ have been tried and convicted in a COURT OF LAW........

Curious that is......

Not really all that curious. Innocent people are tried and convicted in courts of law all the time. We incarcerate, per capita, more people than any other country on earth, many of which are imprisoned for political non-crimes like "drug offenses".

This is to say nothing of our domestic police forces who torture, murder, entrap, and secure false confessions from innocent people.
 
Why stop at the USG?

China, Russia, NK, Iran, Pakistan, whatever.

What authority or power would these foreign government have to investigate a crime that occurred within the territorial borders and legal jurisdiction of the U.S. government? That would be like trying to investigate a crime scene from ten thousand miles away. It would be an exercise in futility.
 
What authority or power would these foreign government have to investigate a crime that occurred within the territorial borders and legal jurisdiction of the U.S. government? That would be like trying to investigate a crime scene from ten thousand miles away. It would be an exercise in futility.

I'm sure that you simply overlooked the possibility of state sponsership of 9/11 by a foriegn enemy, right?
 
In other words, your moronic religion is unfalsifiable. No evidence whatsoever for involvement by the US Government?. Well, that just proves that the thousands of people involved in the investigation covered up the crime of the millennium for whatever reasons you want to pull out of your ass without a single one coming clean. And thus you don't have to alter your religious beliefs no matter what. Truly pathetic.

It's quite telling that you government truthers would stoop to calling the act of asking questions a, "moronic religion".

Again, how would I be able to acquire evidence of U.S. government involvement in the 9/11 attacks when the U.S. government controlled either all of the investigations or all the avenues of independent investigation? What if Al-Qaeda had not only pulled off the attacks, as you believe, but then had the authority to control the investigation in the aftermath? Do you honestly believe they would have allowed incriminating evidence against their organization to see the light of day? Of course not, so don't be ridiculous.

Also, why would someone involved in the attacks come clean about it? It would almost surely mean a death sentence. People would also ask that person why they didn't come clean before the attacks so they could be prevented. Use your head, for crying out loud.
 
I'm sure that you simply overlooked the possibility of state sponsership of 9/11 by a foriegn enemy, right?

No, of course not. I suspect Mossad involvement and have stated so. But again, the crime occurred here in the United States. The crime scene was 100% here in the United States. Nobody other than the United States government has the authority to investigate that crime in its entirety. Other countries could investigate from the periphery, but it wouldn't constitute a proper investigation.
 
It's quite telling that you government truthers would stoop to calling the act of asking questions a, "moronic religion".

Again, how would I be able to acquire evidence of U.S. government involvement in the 9/11 attacks when the U.S. government controlled either all of the investigations or all the avenues of independent investigation? What if Al-Qaeda had not only pulled off the attacks, as you believe, but then had the authority to control the investigation in the aftermath? Do you honestly believe they would have allowed incriminating evidence against their organization to see the light of day? Of course not, so don't be ridiculous.

Also, why would someone involved in the attacks come clean about it? It would almost surely mean a death sentence. People would also ask that person why they didn't come clean before the attacks so they could be prevented. Use your head, for crying out loud.

When one asks a question, and the question is answered, a reasonable fella might check around and confirm the answer.

Somebody that asks questions, doesn't like the answer, and insists that the question was in fact not answered is not acting as an honest interested party.
 
No, of course not. I suspect Mossad involvement and have stated so. But again, the crime occurred here in the United States. The crime scene was 100% here in the United States. Nobody other than the United States government has the authority to investigate that crime in its entirety. Other countries could investigate from the periphery, but it wouldn't constitute a proper investigation.

See my above post - you aren't getting the answers you want, and refuse to acknowledge the possibility that your construct of events is false.
 
blah blah blah my moronic religion is based on no evidence whatsoever, is unfalsifiable and I only believe in it because I want to blah blah blah

ftfy

Also, why would someone involved in the attacks come clean about it? It would almost surely mean a death sentence. People would also ask that person why they didn't come clean before the attacks so they could be prevented. Use your head, for crying out loud.

Learn to read, genius. I was talking about the many thousands people who investigated after the fact. This includes half the FBI. They report no involvement of anybody besides al Qaeda. Not a single FBI agent has said different in the intervening ten years. You pull some reason about why this would be out of your ass.

Or perhaps you think that George Bush somehow got all these people to go along with the plot and coverup before the fact?
 
It's quite telling that you government truthers would stoop to calling the act of asking questions a, "moronic religion".

Again, how would I be able to acquire evidence of U.S. government involvement in the 9/11 attacks when the U.S. government controlled either all of the investigations or all the avenues of independent investigation? What if Al-Qaeda had not only pulled off the attacks, as you believe, but then had the authority to control the investigation in the aftermath? Do you honestly believe they would have allowed incriminating evidence against their organization to see the light of day? Of course not, so don't be ridiculous.

Also, why would someone involved in the attacks come clean about it? It would almost surely mean a death sentence. People would also ask that person why they didn't come clean before the attacks so they could be prevented. Use your head, for crying out loud.
The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job. 100% impossible. How that must stick in your craw.
 
Only because we have a corrupt, criminal government who would never allow a thorough investigation that could possibly falsify my beliefs.

But that's not my fault or a flaw in my thinking.

Or we have a very large government made up very diverse people and its only the mental gymnastics of the intellectually incapable who seem to think they operate in a singular fashion. Sorry but your circular reasoning isn't very impressive.

All SHC has proven since his first post is he has no idea how the US govt is structured, who investigated what, how science works, or what logic is. Nor does he care. Got to protect those precious beliefs!

His entire argument boiled down to its very simplistic premise: Da gubmint, they hide my facts.
 
Last edited:
Learn to read, genius. I was talking about the many thousands people who investigated after the fact.

Of course, you're now assuming that these many thousands of people would have been allowed to fully investigate every possible segment of the attacks. There's far too much compartmentalization in the government to make that assumption. Aside from the people at the very, very top of the CIA, FBI, NSA, Pentagon, and D.C. government, nobody is allowed to see the whole picture. There are many things not even the president is allowed to know about or look into.

This includes half the FBI. They report no involvement of anybody besides al Qaeda. Not a single FBI agent has said different in the intervening ten years. You pull some reason about why this would be out of your ass.

No, not really. You're assuming half the FBI would be allowed to investigate something with national security implications. It doesn't work that way.

Or perhaps you think that George Bush somehow got all these people to go along with the plot and coverup before the fact?

This assumes George Bush had anything at all to do with organizing the attacks and coverup. This might be your stupidest assumption of all. It will be tough to top that one.
 

Back
Top Bottom