Saw my very first one on the road today. It was next to us in traffic. "Holy **** it's a freaking Volt"! My wife looked around, "A what?". "There," I pointed at it, "a Chevy Volt. The electric car they can't give away, even with a ten grand tax break." "It's ugly." was all she had to say. A herd of old ladies were in it. They seemed to be having a good time. Might have a killer sound system, who knows. While I didn't find it, 'ugly', it sure wasn't anything to write home about ether. Although, I guess it was enough to write about on an interwebs discussion board.
Eight hours to recharge with the equivalent of one gallon of gas. I don't understand why nobody wants one.
I find lagging sales for an electric car while at the same time people are screaming for cheaper gas to be interesting.
Why? Will the gas saved make up for the premium on purchase price?I find lagging sales for an electric car while at the same time people are screaming for cheaper gas to be interesting.
I would not call it ugly. Actually, I think it looks rather ordinary. I am surprised you recognized it at a glance.Saw my very first one on the road today. It was next to us in traffic. "Holy **** it's a freaking Volt"! My wife looked around, "A what?". "There," I pointed at it, "a Chevy Volt. The electric car they can't give away, even with a ten grand tax break." "It's ugly." was all she had to say. A herd of old ladies were in it. They seemed to be having a good time. Might have a killer sound system, who knows. While I didn't find it, 'ugly', it sure wasn't anything to write home about ether. Although, I guess it was enough to write about on an interwebs discussion board.
Funny thing, they may look like aerodynamic maggots, but actually are not. At typical car speed what slips best through the air is dolphin shape: big rounded fore and tapering aft. Most modern cars perform best aerodynamically when driven backward.Used to be I could tell a Chevy from a Dodge. Nowadays, they all look the same. Like aerodynamic maggots. Bring back 1960.
I would not call it ugly. Actually, I think it looks rather ordinary. I am surprised you recognized it at a glance.
Well there is the problem in that people need to ride in cars, and putting the engine in the back would create weight distribution issues that can cause probems with handling.Funny thing, they may look like aerodynamic maggots, but actually are not. At typical car speed what slips best through the air is dolphin shape: big rounded fore and tapering aft. Most modern cars perform best aerodynamically when driven backward.
At typical car speed what slips best through the air is dolphin shape: big rounded fore and tapering aft. Most modern cars perform best aerodynamically when driven backward.
I find lagging sales for an electric car while at the same time people are screaming for cheaper gas to be interesting.
I could have sworn I learned somewhere that for a given shape, the aerodynamic effect is the same regardless of which edge is the leading edge and which edge is the trailing edge; i.e., a car's aerodynamic performance is the same driving forwards or backwards.
It makes sense to me intuitively. Take a cone, for example. The pointy end slips through the air quite nicely, but the flat end creates a lot of suction and drag trailing along behind. Turn it around, and now the flat end piles up a lot of air in front, but it all slides nicely off the pointy end behind. Front or back, the flat and pointy ends give the same overall effect.
Sadly, a few minutes of investigoogling have turned up no information one way or the other. You may be right.