AE911T: "WTC 7 Blueprints Exposed Via FOIA Request"

double_o said:
What the...
The second sentence doesn't follow the first, I'm stunding that.
Click to expand...


I'm Stundieing this bit:


Orphia Nay said:
Ronald H. Brookman's statement on AE911Truth's website:

I would really like to know why complete collapse of the twin towers "became inevitable" as expressed by NIST without any scientific analysis to substantiate it. Why would all 110 stories drop straight down to the ground in about 10 seconds, pulverizing most of the contents into dust and ash - twice?
Click to expand...

http://www2.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=_ENGSONLY_
Click to expand...




"I could believe one collapse like that, but two? Come on!"
 
Gage attracts those few fringe people who have thought about 911 for as long as it takes them to type out their statement. The entire extent of their investigation was watching on 911, and making up failed quotes.

Anyone who has ever witnessed a controlled demolition would have immediately recognized its 'signature in this collapse. Not likely to cut off all of the columns on only one side of the building and still have it come down vertically, virtually within its own footprint, like it did. http://www2.ae911truth.org/profile.php?uid=984930
Click to expand...

Own footprint? 2 acres of WTC towers become 19 acres of debris field.

Signature of controlled demolition? The silent explosives kind.

Come down vertically? An engineer who has no clue what direction gravity tends to act in.

A few hundred nuts who happen to be engineers supporting Gage's fraud is not signification. This is the Internet, significant comes in millions. Why can't Gage get a million engineers? Because his engineers are nuts. Their colleagues and friends know they are insane on 911. If Gage had substance, all his engineers would contact all their fellow engineers and Gage's numbers would quadruple every week.
 
beachnut said:
Gage attracts those few fringe people who have thought about 911 for as long as it takes them to type out their statement. The entire extent of their investigation was watching on 911, and making up failed quotes.



Own footprint? 2 acres of WTC towers become 19 acres of debris field.

Signature of controlled demolition? The silent explosives kind.

Come down vertically? An engineer who has no clue what direction gravity tends to act in.

A few hundred nuts who happen to be engineers supporting Gage's fraud is not signification. This is the Internet, significant comes in millions. Why can't Gage get a million engineers? Because his engineers are nuts. Their colleagues and friends know they are insane on 911. If Gage had substance, all his engineers would contact all their fellow engineers and Gage's numbers would quadruple every week.
Click to expand...

Half of all structural engineers are below average and trapped in Gage's web you'll find those from this group.

That's why you won't see the Robertsons, Astaneh Asls, Calatravas, Arups, Lins fooled by this ignorance.
 
Horatius said:
I'm Stundieing this bit:





"I could believe one collapse like that, but two? Come on!"
Click to expand...


Why would you stundie this? What don't you understand about his questions? If you think his questions are outrageous, why don't you simply explain for us what it is you magically see that he (along with millions of others) doesn't?
 
AJM8125 said:
Hmm...

Something I've been interested in finding out is the stairway on the sixth floor, where Jennings and Hess got stuck. There's probably a switchback or some other transition point they missed in the dark. IIRC, that's the point where WTC was built onto the Con-Ed substation, so the stairs might've done something counterintuitive there.

Can't dl them now, I'm on my phone.
Click to expand...

The stairs change location on floor 5 from the centre of the building to nearer the eastern side so they would have had to go straight then turn left and go down a corridor rather than continuing to circle down the stairwell. There's a diagram of the floor showing the layout in NCSTAR 1-9 on page 50 with the floor 6 layout on page 51. If their vision was obscured by smoke and dust or even just a lack of power for lights they might have missed the change and run into a dead end.
 
Last edited:
How dumb do you have to be to join Gage's travel club for one?
Obviously the design, detailing, fabrication and erection of WTC 7 took several years from start to finish. It is not obvious how NIST can claim that fires fueled by office furnishings could have compromised this steel structure in a matter of hours and destroyed it in a matter of seconds.
Click to expand...
Fire destroyed WTC7, and this poor person has no clue. He can't figure out 911 given 10 years.
 
ergo said:
Why would you stundie this? What don't you understand about his questions? If you think his questions are outrageous, why don't you simply explain for us what it is you magically see that he (along with millions of others) doesn't?
Click to expand...
The "twice" bit implies that he would have no problem with it happening once, despite the fact that the second collapse was a near-identical building undergoing very similar damage.

It's like having whack you in the knee with a baseball bat, then whacking your identical twin brother in the same place but from a different angle. You are both going to look very similar as you go down in pain.

Truthers are the minority. I'd be surprised if they number one million, much less several.
 
000063 said:
The "twice" bit implies that he would have no problem with it happening once, despite the fact that the second collapse was a near-identical building undergoing very similar damage.

It's like having whack you in the knee with a baseball bat, then whacking your identical twin brother in the same place but from a different angle. You are both going to look very similar as you go down in pain.

Truthers are the minority. I'd be surprised if they number one million, much less several.
Click to expand...

Not if one of them is the evil twin, that one would go down via a thermiteafied CD.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom