It doesn't matter. You have the burden of proof to prove something that cannot be proven because no image of any supposed plane can be proven legit. Video or still, they are all fake.
Come on guys lets face it, there were no twin towers to begin with. Truth is the 1993 bombings blew both towers down, however it was covered up so that in 2001 they could pretend to knock them down, blame it on 19 Egyptians and Saudi-Arabians so they could go to war with Iraq.....
url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html]CNN.com - Transcripts[/url]
This man had a north view of the towers and saw the drone coming from the west.
OK, we actually have an "Eyewitness News" reporter, Dr. J. Atlasberg (ph) who was downtown at the time and he is on the phone with us live.
Dr. J., what can you tell us?
DR. J. ATLASBERG (ph), REPORTER: Hello, Steve.
I'm actually uptown at 86th and Riverside. I can see the World Trade Center from about half the building up to the top. And about five minutes ago, as I was watching the smoke, a small plane -- I did -- it looked like a propeller plane, came in from the west. And about 20 or 25 stories below the top of the center, disappeared for a second, and then explode behind a water tower, so I couldn't tell whether it hit the building or not. But it was very visible, that a plane had come in at a low altitude and appeared to crash into the World Trade Center.
Since high def video of planes hitting the towers has been provided you've been proven wrong. Granted you were proven wrong before that but still...We all know now that fake 175 rose in altitude in its final seconds of fake approach, thanks, to some keen eyes.
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/LUISALONSOtrajectories.gif[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/jack_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
We all know now that fake 175 rose in altitude in its final seconds of fake approach, thanks, to some keen eyes.
We all know now that fake 175 rose in altitude in its final seconds of fake approach, thanks, to some keen eyes.
Everything to the left of the red vertical line is WEST, Flight 175 approached from the southwest!
[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/Flight_Path-1.jpg[/qimg]
Do you have any high res video of the blobs or orbs? It's impossible to make out any detail about them in the low res video you've posted.
Thanks in advance.
Since high def video of planes hitting the towers has been provided you've been proven wrong. Granted you were proven wrong before that but still...
Awesome. A guy from 5.66 MILES away says it was something else, but the guy >1 mile away says it was a 767, and you think the guy 5.66 MILES away is RIGHT?!?!?!
WTF is wrong with your logical and critical thinking skills?
WTF, seriously, is going through your head as you type......
This guy Richard D. Hall has figured it out. It was "ball-type crafts," not planes that hit the towers.
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/51339/9_11_New_3D_Analysis/


Yea, the 4 broadcasts that all confirm it was a plane.
unreal.
I also like how he uses quotes from people that say they didnt see a plane to say that a drone hit the towers. Only, it was essentially a flying saucer since according to 7forever it didnt have any wings.
UFOS destroyed the WTC
I gotta say, that is new to meSomeone mentioned Jammy earlier, from what I remember Jammy made more sense as at least he was simply saying that it was all fake, right?