• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

sheeplesnshills said:
Drone have wings, so why would they need to fake them?:D
Click to expand...
He means fake jumbo jet plane wings, which would somehow be enough to convince people that they were seeing a plane. Nevermind that a drone could not carry that sort of weight, or that there is no logical reason for the conspirators to have the drone circle the towers.
 
7forever said:
How does a west approach work for the official lie that requires a south approach? YOU ARE DEFEATED.:boxedin:
Click to expand...
Everything to the left of the red vertical line is WEST, Flight 175 approached from the southwest!

Flight_Path-1.jpg
 
ABC News Special Report: "Planes crash into World Trade Center"

He never saw a plane like that before, because it wasn't a plane at all. He said it twice, corroborating witnesses like Burnback and Oliver who described a drone. It was identical to what hit the north tower.

Mr Arraki

"Yeah. I--I saw--yeah, I saw the second plane, it go boom. I--I heard, you know. I just wake up my head like that I saw the side, too"

Arraki claims that the plane that hit WTC2 was identical to the plane that hit WTC1. Arraki's description of the first plane is reproduced below:

"I saw it come up from the left, and I saw the plane coming through to the building, go inside, a small plane, no, no, it was plane, you know, like they teach the people to pilot plane, small plane, you know, it was that kind of plane, yes, going into the building, and I never saw that plane before. It's like something, I don't know, it's like they work with the motors, I never saw a plane like that before!"
 
I think it's time everyone ignores the obvious troll.


Besides, spectators sometimes have problems deciding who's who when you argue with crazy people.
 
Last edited:
7forever said:
ABC News Special Report: "Planes crash into World Trade Center"

He never saw a plane like that before, because it wasn't a plane at all. He said it twice, corroborating witnesses like Burnback and Oliver who described a drone. It was identical to what hit the north tower.

Mr Arraki

"Yeah. I--I saw--yeah, I saw the second plane, it go boom. I--I heard, you know. I just wake up my head like that I saw the side, too"

Arraki claims that the plane that hit WTC2 was identical to the plane that hit WTC1. Arraki's description of the first plane is reproduced below:

"I saw it come up from the left, and I saw the plane coming through to the building, go inside, a small plane, no, no, it was plane, you know, like they teach the people to pilot plane, small plane, you know, it was that kind of plane, yes, going into the building, and I never saw that plane before. It's like something, I don't know, it's like they work with the motors, I never saw a plane like that before!"
Click to expand...

Yet planes still hit the WTC and the Pentagon.
 
7forever why is it okay for you to use a couple anomalous quotes that appear to support your position, but you ignore the literally hundreds of eye witness reports that show otherwise? Did you learn that in Irrational Conspiracy Theorist 101, first semester?

Do you really think mining the huge amount of physical and eye witness evidence of planes for a couple of nuggets that you can twist around impresses us?
 
7forever said:
ABC News Special Report: "Planes crash into World Trade Center"

He never saw a plane like that before, because it wasn't a plane at all. He said it twice, corroborating witnesses like Burnback and Oliver who described a drone. It was identical to what hit the north tower.

Mr Arraki

"Yeah. I--I saw--yeah, I saw the second plane, it go boom. I--I heard, you know. I just wake up my head like that I saw the side, too"

Arraki claims that the plane that hit WTC2 was identical to the plane that hit WTC1. Arraki's description of the first plane is reproduced below:

"I saw it come up from the left, and I saw the plane coming through to the building, go inside, a small plane, no, no, it was plane, you know, like they teach the people to pilot plane, small plane, you know, it was that kind of plane, yes, going into the building, and I never saw that plane before. It's like something, I don't know, it's like they work with the motors, I never saw a plane like that before!"
Click to expand...

Hooray for ignorance!
 
Let's see if I have this right.
Videos of the aircraft hitting the WTC proves that no aircraft hit the WTC ?
7forever is your tinfoil shiny side out ?
 
George152 said:
Let's see if I have this right.
Videos of the aircraft hitting the WTC proves that no aircraft hit the WTC ?
7forever is your tinfoil shiny side out ?
Click to expand...

I also like how he uses quotes from people that say they didnt see a plane to say that a drone hit the towers. Only, it was essentially a flying saucer since according to 7forever it didnt have any wings. :rolleyes:

UFOS destroyed the WTC

I gotta say, that is new to me:D Someone mentioned Jammy earlier, from what I remember Jammy made more sense as at least he was simply saying that it was all fake, right?
 
Last edited:
7forever said:
ABC News Special Report: "Planes crash into World Trade Center"
Click to expand...

Now that you've proved that it was airplanes that crashed into the towers, do you have any high res video of what you are calling blobs? I can't make out the detail in the low res ones you've been posting.
 
7forever said:
ABC News Special Report: "Planes crash into World Trade Center"

He never saw a plane like that before, because it wasn't a plane at all. He said it twice, corroborating witnesses like Burnback and Oliver who described a drone. It was identical to what hit the north tower.

Mr Arraki

"Yeah. I--I saw--yeah, I saw the second plane, it go boom. I--I heard, you know. I just wake up my head like that I saw the side, too"

Arraki claims that the plane that hit WTC2 was identical to the plane that hit WTC1. Arraki's description of the first plane is reproduced below:

"I saw it come up from the left, and I saw the plane coming through to the building, go inside, a small plane, no, no, it was plane, you know, like they teach the people to pilot plane, small plane, you know, it was that kind of plane, yes, going into the building, and I never saw that plane before. It's like something, I don't know, it's like they work with the motors, I never saw a plane like that before!"
Click to expand...

http://www.alien-ufos.com/conspirac...11-no-real-planes-new-york-8.html#post9811944

How many forums are you posting the same lies?
The drone part, is a lie.
 
IF the Planes didn't hit the towers where are they? Where are the Crews and Passengers?
 
I usually try not to address trolls because I think it is a fruitless adventure that leads to nothing. But in this case, I will make an exception.

7forever, you keep saying that no planes hit the towers and that they were blobs, orbs, or whatever. I that is true, then how do you explain the fact that the EWR controllers not only seen Flt175 on radar, but also had Flt175 sighted visually?
 
Two different perspectives of the murder of Flight 175 passengers, 911 truth nuts will call the same flight path, two different flight paths.

perspectivewhat911truthlacks.gif

Add Perspective to the very long list of things 911 truth does not understand.
Sad fact, since most have a PhD at Google U., what does wiki say about the failure of 911 truth nuts?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective_distortion_(photography)

RADAR and perspective debunk no planers who claim these video clips show different flight paths. Not sure how delusional 911 truth can get, but this is near the limit.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom