9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

[7forever]

Everything is fake

Except the blob from the west. It has consistency that your fantasy of planes, fails at miserably.

 

[plague311]

Flight 175 apparently flew in a southwesterly direction as it crossed the Hudson River, continued into New Jersey until it was southwest of New York City, and then made a sharp turn to the northeast in order to approach the World Trade Center from the southwest

Source

 

[DGM]

Can you offer proof that boeing made passenger planes that were black with no windows?

Can you show the towers had no windows? Look above. I just showed they did.

 

[7forever]

Can you show the towers had no windows? Look above. I just showed they did.

The footage was degraded in many clips. That doesn't change the blob from the west appearing in four broadcasts. It wasn't a boeing, but a drone.

 

[DGM]

The footage was degraded in many clips. That doesn't change the blob from the west appearing in four broadcasts. It wasn't a boeing, but a drone.

Why would that be odd? Are you aware the plane turned?

 

[7forever]

Source

That's the official flight path. At least you did something besides trolling. The exact direction is not very important. From the north view, right of the towers is west, and behind is south. This means, that without any wiggle room, 175 had to be flying north, being entirely behind the towers, and not west, moving east which all drone footage was. The cgi for the drone was improved to be more southwest, but still impossible and different from the required, official flight path.

 

[7forever]

Why would that be odd? Are you aware the plane turned?

The official flight path was behind the tower for 15 or 20 minutes. When witnesses said circle, they meant the final seconds of approach, which debunks the official path and corroborates the drone footage.

 

[DGM]

The official flight path was behind the tower for 15 or 20 minutes. When witnesses said circle, they meant the final seconds of approach, which debunks the official path and corroborates the drone footage.

Wrong.

 

[Garrison]

I believe my eyes and witness testimony that confirms something circled the towers in the final seconds before explosion. That was a drone.

The eyewitness testimony overwhelming states that planes were seen but you choose to ignore that.

 

[plague311]

Witnesses saw the plane flying at low altitude over Manhattan and thought the aircraft was in distress. Lieutenant William Walsh of the FDNY (who appears in the documentary film 9/11) witnessed the aircraft: "We were under the impression – he looked like he was going down, but we didn't hear any mechanical difficulty. We couldn't figure out why an American Airlines plane would be so low in downtown Manhattan. We sort of expected him to veer off and go into the Hudson. But he just rose a little bit, his altitude, leveled off, and he was headed straight for the Trade Center. So just before he got to the Trade Center it seemed as though he gained power. We were just watching this airplane on target for the World Trade Center. All of a sudden, boom! He disappears into the Trade Center."

He specifically states that he HEARD the plane, sight has nothing to do with it now. He heard it.So how did they get the sound to work?

 

[plague311]

A WNYW newscamera left rolling on the ground also captured audio of the crash and video of the immediate aftermath.

Again, sound.

 

[beachnut]

There were no planes. The planes at the WTC were drones.

I write this: "RADAR data proves 11 and 175 impacted the WTC, you don't use evidence you post idiotic lies based on fantasy. You make insane claims." Is 7 forever typing challenged, a plagiarizer, stealing ideas, and posting them? You can copy and paste, too bad you can't copy logic, and knowledge.

RADAR data proves that 175 could not have impacted the WTC, you don't use evidence you post idiotic lies based on fantasy. You make insane claims.

You fail to comment on video footage and witnesses who reported something, not a boeing that circled the towers, that came from newark.

No comment, I have RADAR, you have news reports, and witnesses, you twist to support your lies. They say your claims are insane. None of the witnesses support your LIES, not one will appreciate how you quote mine them to spread lies about murder.

Your proof of drones is what? Your word. A lie.
Why do you plagiarize your ideas, and posts?
Do you know what plagiarism is?

RADAR proves 175 hit the WTC tower. You failed to present evidence. Thus, 175 impacted, and your drone claim remains a fantasy, proved only in your mind.

You spread lies, unknowingly posting proof your claims are lies. You have not presented anything new, or correct. How big are the circles? Radius of turn, please, in miles or NM. Lets get to the flying part of your fantasy.

 

[Andy_Ross]

IF Drones hit the towers, what happened to the two aircraft, their crew and passengers?

They certainly existed and certainly took off and started their flights.

Where did they go and where are they?

 

[Garrison]

The footage was degraded in many clips. That doesn't change the blob from the west appearing in four broadcasts. It wasn't a boeing, but a drone.

It was degraded in all the ones you use to support your claim; the ones that aren't degraded clearly show planes.

 

[RoboTimbo]

That's the official flight path. At least you did something besides trolling. The exact direction is not very important. From the north view, right of the towers is west, and behind is south. This means, that without any wiggle room, 175 had to be flying north, being entirely behind the towers, and not west, moving east which all drone footage was. The cgi for the drone was improved to be more southwest, but still impossible and different from the required, official flight path.

What happened to flight 11 and flight 175, the planes and people on them? When do you think you'll be able to make up a looney story to account for them?

 

[beachnut]

What happened to flight 11 and flight 175, the planes and people on them? When do you think you'll be able to make up a looney story to account for them?

Do you ask the raccoon what happen to your Koi? 7forever is too busy trolling the world forums to answer questions, and like the midnight bandit, Rocky, he leaves no Koi bones behind to support evidence of his damage; in this case truth and sanity.
He is making his rounds right now, looks like, to more than 20 forums.

He is making the same impact all over the world.

http://www.scam.com/showpost.php?p=1139152&postcount=919

WOW!!

Thanks beachnut. He (?) must be sicker than I thought.

I have not checked to see how many were the exact cut and paste nonsense. "grandpa pa, where is the ice-cream is ringing my ears from a ~.25 clone"...

7forever, says -
Don't waste my time with babble- I want facts or interesting questions asked. I want theories and ideas. I am fact-minded on this, but part of being open minded is listening to the other side's fantasies, so I will entertain you all.

Keep in mind I did my own 9/11 research in the last four months, and a silly looking drone came from the west and exploded the south tower, so I am well versed on the topic. So, tell me your fake delusions of planes for either tower and I will show facts derived from video and eyewitnesses.

A silly looking drone, about to kill all on board. How nice this kid is, really a cute kid who loves his fellow man; super feelings. Don't understand this.

RADAR is not interesting, I understand. He is well versed? 911 truth super chanter.

 

[kmortis]

Keep it on topic and civil. The topic is not the other posters.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: kmortis

 

[000063]

Can you offer proof that boeing made passenger planes that were black with no windows?

No, but I bet he can offer proof that a back-lit low-res low-quality video of a plane may appear to be black with no windows.

I mean, you're arguing that they faked a plane crash using a plane that doesn't exist.

Plus your inability to address little things like the thousands of people who think they saw a plane. You've jumped back and forth between a "blob" and "drone with fake wings".

 

[RoboTimbo]

The official flight path was behind the tower for 15 or 20 minutes. When witnesses said circle, they meant the final seconds of approach, which debunks the official path and corroborates the drone footage.

I'm unable to make out a drone in any of that low res foolage. Do you have the higher res footage so we can make out more detail?

 

[sheeplesnshills]

No, but I bet he can offer proof that a back-lit low-res low-quality video of a plane may appear to be black with no windows.

I mean, you're arguing that they faked a plane crash using a plane that doesn't exist.

Plus your inability to address little things like the thousands of people who think they saw a plane. You've jumped back and forth between a "blob" and "drone with fake wings".

Drone have wings, so why would they need to fake them?