Edx
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 5,642
So according to you if someone says they didnt see a plane, this means they saw "blob", but failed to mention it?
Last edited:
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake
- Thread starter Tinfoil Hater
- Start date
-
- Tags
- no planers
So according to you if someone says they didnt see a plane, this means they saw "blob", but failed to mention it?
Edx
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 5,642
You didnt answer my question.
Are you saying it was a LITERAL "blob" or not?
or actually this...
I also asked you this....
If someone didnt see a plane and this means there was no boeing, then why doesnt that mean there was no "blob" either? If they could miss the blob, why couldnt they miss the boeing?
Therer were no fake planes. The planes at the WTC were Flight 11 and Flight 175, it is insanity to claim otherwise.
RADAR data proves 11 and 175 impacted the WTC, you don't use evidence you post idiotic lies based on fantasy. You make insane claims.
You fail to comment on RADAR data, like you don't do science, or have some learning problem. Can we help you, so you need help understanding video, physics, math, and RADAR? You don't seem to care as you lie about the video, aircraft and 911.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc03.pdf
http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Rec_Radar_Data_Study_all_aircraft.pdf
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Image:Radar_Data_Impact_Speed_Study--AA11,_UA175.pdf
If you don't understand RADAR, you could ask a teacher to explain it to you.
Last edited:
Oh, I see! So the destruction of the World Trade Center was done in Hollywood... that also explains the fake lunar landings!
I get it now!
You are changing the subject. I posted the bogey many times and pointed out that at least one fake plane was faked because of numerous impossibilities. It was on the cover of mags in all its fakeness. An open flap, on I believe the front of the right wing.LOL With that right engine attached to air.
You are changing the subject. I posted the bogey many times and pointed out that at least one fake plane was faked because of numerous impossibilities. It was on the cover of mags in all its fakeness. An open flap, on I believe the front of the right wing.LOL With that right engine attached to air.
No subject has been changed... actually, you keep trying to change what you're saying...
Now you're saying it's a bogey...
So what is it? A blob or a bogey?
url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html]CNN.com - Transcripts[/url]
This man had a north view of the towers and saw the drone coming from the west.
OK, we actually have an "Eyewitness News" reporter, Dr. J. Atlasberg (ph) who was downtown at the time and he is on the phone with us live.
Dr. J., what can you tell us?
DR. J. ATLASBERG (ph), REPORTER: Hello, Steve.
I'm actually uptown at 86th and Riverside. I can see the World Trade Center from about half the building up to the top. And about five minutes ago, as I was watching the smoke, a small plane -- I did -- it looked like a propeller plane, came in from the west. And about 20 or 25 stories below the top of the center, disappeared for a second, and then explode behind a water tower, so I couldn't tell whether it hit the building or not. But it was very visible, that a plane had come in at a low altitude and appeared to crash into the World Trade Center.
This man had a north view of the towers and saw the drone coming from the west.
OK, we actually have an "Eyewitness News" reporter, Dr. J. Atlasberg (ph) who was downtown at the time and he is on the phone with us live.
Dr. J., what can you tell us?
DR. J. ATLASBERG (ph), REPORTER: Hello, Steve.
I'm actually uptown at 86th and Riverside. I can see the World Trade Center from about half the building up to the top. And about five minutes ago, as I was watching the smoke, a small plane -- I did -- it looked like a propeller plane, came in from the west. And about 20 or 25 stories below the top of the center, disappeared for a second, and then explode behind a water tower, so I couldn't tell whether it hit the building or not. But it was very visible, that a plane had come in at a low altitude and appeared to crash into the World Trade Center.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
So your claim is the city is blurry? You also claim the towers had no visible windows? Is NJ also a "blob"?You are changing the subject. I posted the bogey many times and pointed out that at least one fake plane was faked because of numerous impossibilities. It was on the cover of mags in all its fakeness. An open flap, on I believe the front of the right wing.LOL With that right engine attached to air.
I didn't change the subject. You simply drifted further off.
There were no planes. The planes at the WTC were drones.
RADAR data proves that 175 could not have impacted the WTC, you don't use evidence you post idiotic lies based on fantasy. You make insane claims.
You fail to comment on video footage and witnesses who reported something, not a boeing that circled the towers, that came from newark.
So thanks for acknowledging there was, at the least, a wing!
There were two, both fake.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Was the city fake too?
plague311
Great minds think...
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
What happened to flights 11 & 175, the planes and people on them that day? Do you have anything sane to say about them?
How does a west approach work for the official lie that requires a south approach? YOU ARE DEFEATED.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Last edited: