9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

[7forever]

Who are these witnesses? You have one or two people with vague statements.

If there is stronger evidence, such as thousands of people who say they saw planes, and you think the video shows a drone, there are only a few possibilities.

1. The video shows planes.
2. The witnesses are wrong.
3. Both are wrong.

The witnesses who support and corroborate the live video that has consistency is right and that is the drone footage.

 

[plague311]

You are a defeated joke who cannot prove a lie. The witnesses are only as good as what can be corroborated by other evidence. The drone footage is consistent and witnesses reported seeing something circle. A plane cannot circle any building but a drone can and did.

No, 7, I am not. You stated 1 person's quote mined referral to a drone. There have been hundreds of quotes from other eyewitnesses, there is video footage, and years of science that go directly against what you are saying.

You're a joke, your theory is a joke, the movement you're apart of is a joke. Read through all the previous posts, most people speak about how they are laughing at what you are saying.

No one takes you seriously, as well they shouldn't.

 

[RoboTimbo]

If you can find a better copy of WB11's drone, link me up.

Nope, sorry. The only foolage of a drone exists in the "minds" of CTwits. What do you think of all the footage of planes hitting the towers? Were you ever going to address that? You posted some of them yourself.

 

[332nd]

If you can find a better copy of WB11's drone, link me up.

Note how 7 builds in an out here. Once the high Res video is linked, he'll insist that since it shows a plane & not a "drone" it must be faked.

 

[000063]

Exactly. She didn't identify it as a chopper because it wasn't, further proving that it was something as weird as it appears on video.

So when she says it was a plane, she was wrong. But when she says it wasn't a plane, it was right?

 

[7forever]

Nope, sorry. The only foolage of a drone exists in the "minds" of CTwits. What do you think of all the footage of planes hitting the towers? Were you ever going to address that? You posted some of them yourself.

Nope, sorry. The only footage of a plane exists in the "minds" brainswashed americans. What do you think of all the footage of the drone coming from the west circling the buildings? You are never going to address that.

 

[RoboTimbo]

Note how 7 builds in an out here. Once the high Res video is linked, he'll insist that since it shows a plane & not a "drone" it must be faked.

Well, to be fair to 7forever, that argument would work on a CTwit.

 

[7forever]

So when she says it was a plane, she was wrong. But when she says it wasn't a plane, it was right?

So, when she couldn't identify as a chopper she was right?

 

[TJM]

Note how 7 builds in an out here. Once the high Res video is linked, he'll insist that since it shows a plane & not a "drone" it must be faked.

Which video is he on about? I might have a hi res of it.

 

[RoboTimbo]

Nope, sorry. The only footage of a plane exists in the "minds" brainswashed americans. What do you think of all the footage of the drone coming from the west circling the buildings? You are never going to address that.

You post some and I promise I'll look at it. What did you think of all the footage of airplanes hitting the towers? You posted some of it.

Also, what happened to flights 11 and 175? Why do you cowardly slink away from answering that?

 

[7forever]

Note how 7 builds in an out here. Once the high Res video is linked, he'll insist that since it shows a plane & not a "drone" it must be faked.

There were no planes. You know this because there is no such thing as black boeings with no windows, wings, and dots for engines.

 

[332nd]

Which video is he on about? I might have a hi res of it.

The one I responded to initially was the Naudet footage of the first impact but he's bounced around so much its hard to tell.

 

[beachnut]

There were no planes. You know this because there is no such thing as black boeings with no windows, wings, and dots for engines.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Image:Radar_Data_Impact_Speed_Study--AA11,_UA175.pdf

Your lack of knowledge is fueling your insane claims.

You ignore people who were murdered, so you can lie. Do your parents know you are spreading insane lies about 911?

 

[7forever]

You post some and I promise I'll look at it. What did you think of all the footage of airplanes hitting the towers? You posted some of it.

Also, what happened to flights 11 and 175? Why do you cowardly slink away from answering that?

I posted a fake image back some pages with the flap open from on the front wing, not rear. One fake equals reasonable doubt. That's what you guys are missing. Greer shot jfk beyond any doubt because it's scary simple, but 911 is really convoluted. That's what folks have been doing for ten years, but my work on 911 is simple and irrefutable at least in regards to the south tower.

 

[7forever]

The one I responded to initially was the Naudet footage of the first impact but he's bounced around so much its hard to tell.

Those french clowns filmed a blob. Only in fantasy and fiction could that be a boeing.

 

[332nd]

There were no planes. You know this because there is no such thing as black boeings with no windows, wings, and dots for engines.

Note how here 7 doesn't deny his out. He just repeats his claims & enforces his ignorance of film, lighting, perspective, ... pretty much reality in general.

 

[7forever]

No, 7, I am not. You stated 1 person's quote mined referral to a drone. There have been hundreds of quotes from other eyewitnesses, there is video footage, and years of science that go directly against what you are saying.

You're a joke, your theory is a joke, the movement you're apart of is a joke. Read through all the previous posts, most people speak about how they are laughing at what you are saying.

No one takes you seriously, as well they shouldn't.

You're a joke, your plane theory is a joke, the movement you're apart of is a joke. It doesn't make any difference what people say about me, you nor they can prove planes because there is only fake evidence for them. The truth mocks you over and over, as well it should.

 

[beachnut]

Those french clowns filmed a blob. Only in fantasy and fiction could that be a boeing.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Image:Radar_Data_Impact_Speed_Study--AA11,_UA175.pdf
... they filmed the planes that impacted the WTC, proved by RADAR. You don't do science, you do lies. Idiotic lies only 4 people on earth believe.

You don't understand RADAR, or video. What other skill deficiency do you have which impede your ability to understand the real world?

 

[7forever]

Note how here 7 doesn't deny his out. He just repeats his claims & enforces his ignorance of film, lighting, perspective, ... pretty much reality in general.

Prove the lie, you can't. You're repeating nothing but excuses with zero to back it up, because the films prove a drone was responsible or least was a trigger.

 

[000063]

You are a defeated joke who cannot prove a lie. The witnesses are only as good as what can be corroborated by other evidence. The drone footage is consistent and witnesses reported seeing something circle. A plane cannot circle any building but a drone can and did.

And many, many more people reported a plane slamming into a building. You do know how eyewitness testimony works, right? When you have video footage of the plane hitting the tower corroborated by thousands of people and RADAR operators, and a few of those people are a little shaky about their testimony, you go with the preponderance of evidence. You don't dismiss the bulk of evidence because it doesn't accord with your theory.

You are lying. She completely refutes her fake footage by saying it came from the west. Her fake footage shows a fake plane coming south to north. She continued to report what she saw, not what her altered video showed.

Didn't you say that she said she saw a plane?

I'm not being deceptive at all. She first described it as what might be a police helicopter, confirming what I posted is what she saw when it aired. She starts calling it a plane which is bat crap looney tunes....

Yes, you did! And then you dismissed it out of hand.

"I'm not crazy! Everyone else is crazy!"

I already explained it. You can nothing but go in circles repeating nonsense about people who didn't see planes but said they did.

But you can go on about people thousands of people who saw planes but really didn't because you think there weren't planes so they didn't see planes.