• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

7forever said:
The fake image they showed at 9:27 wasn't a plane, it was a silly cgi with no wings and dots for engines. The fake image could have never crashed into the southeast corner of T2 because it was north of it. T2 is south and east of T1. It's turn is consistent with it flying north and west of the towers.:D

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wb-927-morph_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

So you're having issues with depth perception, scale, and a giant list of other things. Gotcha.
 
dc1971 said:
Okay, I'll bite!

I'm guessing you might have addressed this already but I'm just curious...

How was this footage faked? What television equipment was used to fake this footage?

How were they able to create CGI graphics on the fly during several live broadcasts?

Which specific television station(s) in NYC were using this equipment and how were they able to keep their whole operation secret?

What specific software was used to create these CGI effects (you do know that computer 3D modeling software is used for effects like this, right?)?

Also, riddle me this, how can all of this be supplemented to a live television broadcast?

I have a video production background so I'm curious to find out if there's technology that is above the scope of your standard video geek.
Click to expand...

The drone footage is consistently coming from the west in 4 broadcasts. That is better than all the silly plane paths with fake imagery. WB11 is proof of fakery because the morph shows up 24 minutes after airing the orb for 23 minutes. That's up to the minute fakery. No honest person would balk at that. It simply happens.
 
fitzgibbon said:
If no RL eyewitness is good enough for him, do you honestly believe something as mundane as proper depth perception will sway him?
Click to expand...

Chest trying to see if there might be some reasonable thought process buried within the deluded paranoia.
 
7forever said:
The fake image they showed at 9:27 wasn't a plane, it was a silly cgi with no wings and dots for engines. The fake image could have never crashed into the southeast corner of T2 because it was north of it. T2 is south and east of T1. It's turn is consistent with it flying north and west of the towers.:D

http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wb-927-morph_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
Click to expand...
You don't understand the science of video. You expose your complete ignorance of video, and repeat that proof, every-time you post. You make up stupid lies and have no evidence. You offer no math about why you think the wings are not there? You don't understand light, reflected light, video frame rates, and other facts which if you had knowledge of, you would stop being a troll posting insane lies.

7forever said:
The deluded people that believe planes hit the towers are simply that and can never be convinced otherwise. It's like telling a cat to stop being a cat. Planers are willfully ignorant and for entertainment purposes only.
Click to expand...
You make posts void of facts and evidence.

RADAR prove you wrong! And you have no idea why because you prefer to made up insane lies about dead people, apologize for murderers.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc03.pdf
Your insane claims wrong by default. Your idiotic lies wrong due to science, which you don't understand. Plagiarize this post, it is all can do besides post nonsense about video, another area you have no knowledge.
 
7forever said:
The drone footage is consistently coming from the west in 4 broadcasts. That is better than all the silly plane paths with fake imagery. WB11 is proof of fakery because the morph shows up 24 minutes after airing the orb for 23 minutes. That's up to the minute fakery. No honest person would balk at that. It simply happens.
Click to expand...

OHHHH! So I assume you have footage of both for us to compare? (holds breath).
 
000063 said:
I believe they are working on AR gear, but it certainly wouldn't have been available or even written in 2001, much less able to simultaneously convince thousands of people they saw planes.

Click to expand...

Nobody saw planes. They reported what was supposed to be there but plenty of witnesses corroborate the live footage which showed the drone.
 
beachnut said:
You don't understand the science of video. You expose your complete ignorance of video, and repeat that proof, every-time you post. You make up stupid lies and have no evidence. You offer no math about why you think the wings are not there? You don't understand light, reflected light, video frame rates, and other facts which if you had knowledge of, you would stop being a troll posting insane lies.


You make posts void of facts and evidence.

RADAR prove you wrong! And you have no idea why because you prefer to made up insane lies about dead people, apologize for murderers.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc03.pdf
Your insane claims wrong by default. Your idiotic lies wrong due to science, which you don't understand. Plagiarize this post, it is all can do besides post nonsense about video, another area you have no knowledge.
Click to expand...

You are completely ignorant. You can't prove a ball was a plane nor can you prove fake imagery depicted anything but nonsense.
 
7forever said:
Nobody saw planes. They reported what was supposed to be there but plenty of witnesses corroborate the live footage which showed the drone.
Click to expand...
Another lie, is this all you have lies, insane lies? How long have you been spreading lies and making fun of people killed by 19 terrorists?

RADAR proves you are spreading lies.

http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Rec_Radar_Data_Study_all_aircraft.pdf
You don't use evidence, you make up idiotic insane claims. Plagiarize my post again, it is indicative of your disrespect and trolling to spread lies.
 
7forever said:
You are completely ignorant. You can't prove a ball was a plane nor can you prove fake imagery depicted anything but nonsense.
Click to expand...

He can. You just choose to gainsay it. On the other hand, you can't address the thousands upon thousands of RL eyewitnesses save by one misquote of one person.

Speaks volumes about your pedantic faith. Chauvin had nothing on you

Fitz
 
fitzgibbon said:
If no RL eyewitness is good enough for him, do you honestly believe something as mundane as proper depth perception will sway him?
Click to expand...

So, you can prove the area west of the towers is really south of the towers? Prove it. From the northview, anything to the right is west of the towers...that's a fact.
 
DGM said:
No you didn't. You posted compressed duplicates. Show the originals or admit your a liar.
Click to expand...

Find the originals that a show a real plane coming from the west, then. The footage is the footage and supports the drone from the west. You are a defeated denialist.
 
7forever said:
You are completely ignorant. You can't prove a ball was a plane nor can you prove fake imagery depicted anything but nonsense.
Click to expand...
You post lies.

RADAR proves you post insane lies, claims so stupid only 4 people on earth agree with your insane claim.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Image:Radar_Data_Impact_Speed_Study--AA11,_UA175.pdf
Maybe you don't read or understand the RADAR reports, you don't understand video, you will not understand why RADAR proves you spread lies. You don't seem to present the math to support your claims; why?


7forever said:
You are completely ignorant. ...
Click to expand...
You are the person posting lies about 911 with no supporting evidence, no math, no physics, just made up insane claims.
You ignore RADAR reports, and continue spreading lies.
 
Last edited:
7forever said:
The drone footage is consistently coming from the west in 4 broadcasts.
Click to expand...

Okay, you have made that point. Now apply this to the questions I just asked. How were they able to do this? What equipment was used? How were they able to produce this for live television?

That is better than all the silly plane paths with fake imagery.
Click to expand...

Okay, and another thing you have established... the planes are fake! Prove that they are fake. You say there is a drone in the broadcast - show how it is a drone and not a plane.

WB11 is proof of fakery because the morph shows up 24 minutes after airing the orb for 23 minutes. That's up to the minute fakery. No honest person would balk at that. It simply happens.
Click to expand...

Okay. What equipment was used to create this fakery? Video toaster? Switcher? Green screen? Blue screen? Video cut-outs? Tweening? How?
 
fitzgibbon said:
He can. You just choose to gainsay it. On the other hand, you can't address the thousands upon thousands of RL eyewitnesses save by one misquote of one person.

Speaks volumes about your pedantic faith. Chauvin had nothing on you

Fitz
Click to expand...

You can't the witnesses like Jennifer Spell who refutes her own doctored video by saying it circled around after coming from Jersey. She's an irrefutable witness.
 
7forever said:
His reporting confirms the drone video footage, you failed again. He was oblivious and gave an honest account without influence.
Click to expand...

You'd be better off listening to what Oliver said, and the context in which the discussion took place.

"It might have been" doesn't equal "it was."

Don't feel bad though, because some other folks without the ability to listen take your side:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB-rwWeL7Sg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom