• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

My favorite so far is when he says "THE IMAGES THAT ARE SHOWN CAN'T BE TRUSTED. JUST LOOK AT THESE IMAGES RIGHT HERE!!!!"
 
7forever said:
The video footage completely destroys the myth of planes in NY. There were no planes because there isn't a single image of real boeing, period. You cannot prove a lie but will continue to believe the lie that was actually pretty much destroyed 4 years ago with sept clues. I went further and didn't ignore the pink elephants like those silly euros did.
Click to expand...

Pink elephants?

"Seeing pink elephants" is a euphemism for drunken hallucination, caused by alcoholic hallucinosis or delirium tremens. The first recorded use of the term is by Jack London in 1913, who describes one kind of alcoholic, in the autobiographical John Barleycorn, as "the man whom we all know, stupid, unimaginative, whose brain is bitten numbly by numb maggots; who walks generously with wide-spread, tentative legs, falls frequently in the gutter, and who sees, in the extremity of his ecstasy, blue mice and pink elephants. He is the type that gives rise to the jokes in the funny papers."[1] London may have derived his metaphor from the 1890s saying "being followed by pink giraffes".[2]
 
7forever said:
WB11 chopper and wnbc drone. Zoom on a distant object leaves no doubt about what that object is, if the cam can get close enough. The orb is smaller than the chopper and notice how very close to the north tower it gets. That debunks the disinfo about it being southwest. It was directly right of the towers and had to circle T2. That is looney tunes.:eye-poppi

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wb-chopper_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/very-close-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/plane-zoom_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Oh, more videos of planes flying into the buildings. What a surprise. Do you not see the inherent problem of posting videos of planes flying into buildings why attempting to prove planes didn't fly into buildings?
 
Craig4 said:
Oh, more videos of planes flying into the buildings. What a surprise. Do you not see the inherent problem of posting videos of planes flying into buildings why attempting to prove planes didn't fly into buildings?
Click to expand...

I think this is what I am having the most problem with:
why is 7forever using videos of a plane flying into a building to prove a plane didn't fly into a building?

What does he see that literally everyone else in the world doesn't?
:confused:
 
cantonear1968 said:
I think this is what I am having the most problem with:
why is 7forever using videos of a plane flying into a building to prove a plane didn't fly into a building?

What does he see that literally everyone else in the world doesn't?
:confused:
Click to expand...

Well you know, if the whole world is out to get you, it's probably onto something. The problem may not be with the whole world.
 
7forever said:
You are changing the subject. This debate, which you won't participate in, is about whether a plane impacted the south tower. That is exactly where you will never be scrambling for evidence of a real boeing. It's about the live footage and witnesses who support that footage with testimony that points to something that was definitely not anything commericial. Many witnesses said it just that way.
Click to expand...

What happened to flights 11 and 175, the planes and people?
 
7forever said:
The same way they would laugh when seeing the driver shoot jfk. They would be laughing because it is totally obvious to the naked eye.:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

And you post the same style of deliberately low res images to fuel your delusions about that. And you run like a rabbit when higher res images are shown to you.

It was nice of you to post a link to a video of the tower showing where an airplane with wings sliced into it. Did you mean to shoot yourself in the foot that way?

Here's a high res image of the bottom of your feet:

 
Last edited:
7forever said:
The same way they would laugh when seeing the driver shoot jfk. They would be laughing because it is totally obvious to the naked eye.:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

You dont understand video compression.
 
Last edited:
RoboTimbo said:
What happened to flights 11 and 175, the planes and people?
Click to expand...

175 and 93 weren't de-registered until 05. Flight 11 was nowhere near T1, but a blob showed up. At least it looks more like something than the south tower ball.

wtcnorthtowernothing.jpg

north-tower-impact_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
7forever said:
175 and 93 weren't de-registered until 05. Flight 11 was nowhere near T1, but a blob showed up. At least it looks more like something than the south tower ball.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcnorthtowernothing.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/north-tower-impact_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Resolution failure.

Next...
 
cantonear1968 said:
I think this is what I am having the most problem with:
why is 7forever using videos of a plane flying into a building to prove a plane didn't fly into a building?

What does he see that literally everyone else in the world doesn't?
:confused:
Click to expand...

Rocky and Bullwinkle? The band that played the Benny Hill theme, possibly? Oh, maybe he can see Smurfs too?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom