Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

KreeL said:
For instance:

Secondary explosive devices.

Explosions going off in the lower sections of the towers.

Molten steel in the sublevels.

Bombs in the buildings.

That building is coming down.

I tried to make it into the lobby, and BIG EXPLOSION, blew me back out into the street.

We made back down to the 12th floor and BIG EXPLOSION.

When we got there it looked like a plane had crashed into the lobby.

Etc.

Etc.

Etc....
Click to expand...

Exactly.

The fire department had to rescue two people from WTC 7 long before it collapsed.
 
I'm legit LOL'ing at these guys thinking they know controlled-demolition.
 
Let me clarify. They rescued Barry and Hess sometime shortly after lunch. No disputing that. However, if you view Barry's eyewitness account of how they were blown back up into the 8th floor, it's obvious something exploded below them in the lower floors. In my theory explosions are going off everywhere on a regular basis. Afterall, to drop these structures like they did, the lower infrastructures had to compromised.

Edited to add: To address a previous question, there was someone who was cherrypicking the testimonies of the firemen. Ignoring completely the ones I dug up from memory.
 
Last edited:
KreeL said:
Let me clarify. They rescued Barry and Hess sometime shortly after lunch. No disputing that. However, if you view Barry's eyewitness account of how they were blown back up into the 8th floor, it's obvious something exploded below them in the lower floors. In my theory explosions are going off everywhere on a regular basis. Afterall, to drop these structures like they did, the lower infrastructure had to compromised.
Click to expand...

Sheesh you sound like a parody now.

So Jennings was blown back by powerful detonations 7 hours before the collapse but didnt sustain any blast injuries. Explosives were going off all day, then 7 hours after it started the building collapsed but none of the numerous videos recording the collapse picked up any of these explosives going off. Very strange kinds of explosives you have there!
 
Last edited:
KreeL said:
Here, not hear. AND, surprise, I'm not trolling.
Click to expand...
You lie about 911, and you lie about yourself.
KreeL - Thu Feb 09 05:33:15
I am working on a another masterful trolling spree in JREF's 9/11 threads.


911 truth uses "pull it" to make up idiotic lies. 10 years of failure for 911 truth. What will 911 truth do next? "pull it"

If Barry was blown by explosives, he would be dead from the explosion. The building was hit by a WTC Tower falling. Fail logic, used while trolling; double fail. Are you a kid? Never been in combat? No experience with explosives?
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
Sheesh you sound like a parody now.

So Jennings was blown back by powerful detonations 7 hours before the collapse but didnt sustain any blast injuries. Explosives were going off all day, then 7 hours after it started the building collapsed but none of the numerous videos recording the collapse picked up any of these explosives going off. Very strange kinds of explosives you have there!
Click to expand...

According to his statement - yes.

There are vids -with sound- that you can hear explosions going off in the WTC complex that day. Handwaving away explosions reported by numerous eyewitnesses, as well as the firemen and first responders, is simply erroneous on your part. Any theory you make up must incorporate the reality of the day.
 
KreeL said:
According to his statement - yes.

There are vids -with sound- that you can hear explosions going off in the WTC complex that day. Handwaving away explosions reported by numerous eyewitnesses, as well as the firemen and first responders, is simply erroneous on your part. Any theory you make up must incorporate the reality of the day.
Click to expand...
Is this your best trolling, you promised masterful, and you are dishing out stupid claims based on hearsay, lies and fantasy.


"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." -- Philip K. Dick
He means when you stop believing in fantasy, you are back to reality. He wrote science fiction. ... appropriate for your failed tripe and lies on 911.

Source all the videos please, the ones that prove explosives were used, with time of day. There were no explosives used at the WTC complex. You are trolling again, you can't source anything which proves explosives were used.

Pull it! The crazy claim of CD because 911 truth can't understand language.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Is this your best trolling, you promised masterful, and you are dishing out stupid claims based on hearsay, lies and fantasy.


"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." -- Philip K. Dick
He means when you stop believing in fantasy, you are back to reality. He wrote science fiction. How appropriate for your failed tripe and lies on 911.

Source all the videos please, with time of day. There were no explosives used at the WTC complex. You are trolling again, you can't source anything.
Click to expand...

I am sorry I assumed you had already looked at videos with explosions and explosion testimonies. I will find them again and post them.
 
KreeL said:
I am sorry I assumed you had already looked at videos with explosions and explosion testimonies. I will find them again and post them.
Click to expand...
You can't find any videos of explosives used on 911. You can't find them, you can't post them.

What you have is hearsay, and sounds like, simile. Plus you are a troll, you don't intend on posting evidence, you failed to figure out 911 and are trolling JREF, posting nonsense of explosives, by thinking sound of explosions are cause by explosives. Failure, 10 years of solid nonsense, from 911 truth. You look up lies and post them.


Do you understand "pull it" meant fire fighting support? Or do you push the delusion of CD? The big lie of CD?
 
Last edited:
KreeL said:
Seven pages of testimonies and sound clips:

http://www.youtube.com/results?sear...14l0l10481l18l16l2l9l11l0l340l805l2.0.2.1l5l0

The body of evidence is what I was referring to. Please look at these and understand where I am coming from on this topic.
Click to expand...

Not one explosive device was used. You proved it.

You are repeating failed claims of explosives made by idiots in 911 truth. 911 truth failed in 2006, and the same failed videos are not proof of explosives. But you are a troll, reposting lies of explosives out of ignorance; this is old stuff, you failed before you showed up for your annual masterful trolling of JREF.

"pull it", is the topic. How 911 truth can't comprehend what is said, like your failed claims of explosives, and you present no evidence of explosives. You can't comprehend it was not CD, just like 911 truth can't comprehend "pull it" pertains to ending fire fighting efforts near WTC 7. Fire fighting includes search and rescue.
 
Last edited:
KreeL said:
Other than your preponderance for handwaving away eyewitness reports, I fail to see how you arrive at that assumption.
Click to expand...

There are eyewitness reports that Elvis is still alive, that bigfoot is real, that aliens visit earth, that various magical god-men lived in ancient times, that monsters live in various lakes, etc etc etc...

And that's not even getting into how much of those eyewitness reports you 911 kiddies dishonestly try to spin doctor out of context...

I'm not convinced by these old snake oil salesman tricks, what else ya got?
 
KreeL said:
Other than your preponderance for handwaving away eyewitness reports, I fail to see how you arrive at that assumption.
Click to expand...
You take random statements, wave your hands, can claim CD. Based on hearsay, lies and fantasy, you form nonsensical claims.

The topic is "pull it", how 911 truth takes a statement which means pulling fire support out of the danger zone, and turns it into CD. 911 truth failed. You think you have evidence, and you are wrong. No explosives were used. Feel free to present your evidence to 60 minutes. But you are trolling, not trying to understand 911, you are trolling JREF.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom