9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

"I was underneath it, I was looking at the tower, I had my camera in my hand, I heard the noise, I never saw the airplane."

wtcnoplanepic.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrbQ0u3xzk&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=25
 
Last edited:
There were around 117 eyewitness accounts and 20% saw a plane. Only 8% saw and heard a plane. I'm not a no planer, but have proven easily, that a drone was the real weapon used for tower 2.

wtcwitnesses.jpg
 
I took the work from September Clues and made into something simple instead of a rambling mess. Dick Oliver called the orb a remote controlled drone and used the word vehicle at some point. He was on the ground and saw it floating like it did in four broadcasts. He was totally oblivious that what he reported and what really happened completely destroyed the official plane myth. NY1 and WB11.

ny1-rewind_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

fast-wb-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB-rwWeL7Sg&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=126&feature=plpp_video
 
Mark, cryptically laughs at the end of his description, further proving that he really saw the drone, and fell short of confirming that it really wasn't a plane. It's no different than Jean Hill saying she saw the secret service shoot back, but not finger the driver who she was looking at. Of course it didn't belong in the area because it was some weird floating drone and not the 767 it was supposed to be.

Eyewitness on 9/11 Mark Burnback was able to get a good view of the plane that hit the World Trade Center, because he said that the plane was flying very low. He explained to FOX News that the plane had no windows, a blue logo, and did not look like a commercial plane.

Fox NewsCaster: "Mark Burnback, a Fox employee, is on the phone with us. Mark witnessed this... Mark were you close enough to see any markings on the airplane?"

Mark Burnback: "Hi gentlemen. Yeah there was definitely a blue, circular logo on the front of the plane towards the front. It definitely did not look like a commercial plane. I did not see any windows on the side. It was definitely very low...

"Mark, if what you say is true, those could be cargo planes or something like that. You said you did not see any windows on the side?"

Mark Burnback: "I did not see any windows on the side. I saw the plane was flying low. I was probably a block away from the sub-way in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low, and again it was not a normal flight that I have ever seen at an airport. It was a plane with a blue logo on the front and it just looked like it did not belong in this area."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYUs9u1YwV0
 
7forever said:
The funny thing is, the image is fake beyond belief and I may be the first honest human to point out its fakeness.
Click to expand...

No, you're just one of many who doesn't understand shadow, perspective, resolution, etc...

But, since you've shown you have no desire to learn why you're wrong.... lets say you're right & you actually found some evidence that shows that picture & the video were faked.
Why are you bringing it up on a relatively obscure internet forum? Why aren't you showing your evidence to someone who can do something, or at least gunning for a bigger audience?
 
7forever said:
There were around 117 eyewitness accounts and 20% saw a plane. Only 8% saw and heard a plane. I'm not a no planer, but have proven easily, that a drone was the real weapon used for tower 2.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcwitnesses.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

So you're saying it wasn't a plane, it was a remote controlled plane?
 
7forever said:
I took the work from September Clues and made into something simple instead of a rambling mess. Dick Oliver called the orb a remote controlled drone and used the word vehicle at some point. He was on the ground and saw it floating like it did in four broadcasts. He was totally oblivious that what he reported and what really happened completely destroyed the official plane myth. NY1 and WB11.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/ny1-rewind_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/fast-wb-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB-rwWeL7Sg&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=126&feature=plpp_video
Click to expand...
Freaking seriously! How bad are your organizational skills? You keep posting videos showing planes flying into buildings. How *********** hard is it to put the videos of the planes in one folder on your desk top and the videos of the orbs in another? Jesus titty *********** Christ, how many *********** times do we have to go over this?
 
7forever said:
There were around 117 eyewitness accounts and 20% saw a plane. Only 8% saw and heard a plane. I'm not a no planer, but have proven easily, that a drone was the real weapon used for tower 2.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcwitnesses.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

No. You're going by the TV interviews where a lot of the people were coming up out of the subway.
 
7forever said:
Mark, cryptically laughs at the end of his description, further proving that he really saw the drone, and fell short of confirming that it really wasn't a plane. It's no different than Jean Hill saying she saw the secret service shoot back, but not finger the driver who she was looking at. Of course it didn't belong in the area because it was some weird floating drone and not the 767 it was supposed to be.

Eyewitness on 9/11 Mark Burnback was able to get a good view of the plane that hit the World Trade Center, because he said that the plane was flying very low. He explained to FOX News that the plane had no windows, a blue logo, and did not look like a commercial plane.

Fox NewsCaster: "Mark Burnback, a Fox employee, is on the phone with us. Mark witnessed this... Mark were you close enough to see any markings on the airplane?"

Mark Burnback: "Hi gentlemen. Yeah there was definitely a blue, circular logo on the front of the plane towards the front. It definitely did not look like a commercial plane. I did not see any windows on the side. It was definitely very low...

"Mark, if what you say is true, those could be cargo planes or something like that. You said you did not see any windows on the side?"

Mark Burnback: "I did not see any windows on the side. I saw the plane was flying low. I was probably a block away from the sub-way in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low, and again it was not a normal flight that I have ever seen at an airport. It was a plane with a blue logo on the front and it just looked like it did not belong in this area."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYUs9u1YwV0
Click to expand...

Wasn't Mark Burnback in Brooklyn? Or Jersey?

What was Mr. Burnback's location?
 
7forever said:
You fail to accept that neither image I showed could be a real plane.
Click to expand...

Why do you feel the images you showed could not be a real aircraft? Please list what features could not be real, and what should be correct.
 
So Im confused, is this guy saying there was no plane, or that there was but it was a "drone"? Because he seems to be arguing both positions at the same time.
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
So Im confused, is this guy saying there was no plane, or that there was but it was a "drone", because he seems to be arguing both positions at the same time.
Click to expand...

That's nothing! Richard Gage can argue "silent explosives" that hundreds of people heard!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom