Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

More explicitly (perhaps): you stated hurricane winds as nonsense.
No, I didn't.

I was not so sure, and that actual hurricane velocity winds may have been possible, either with combustive explosions within the shafts, or via winds induced by either direct compressive or venturi effects as the planes tore accross the elevator shafts. I do not at this time have the modelling resources to establish a viable simulation, so this is just conjecture.
Don't be so complicated. There certainly were massive airflows ventilating fires locally. We don't need to slit the hair of whether or not these reached velocities that satisfy any official definition of "hurricane".

What I did say is that their simplistic explanation of strong winds being the eventual factor that made structural steel surfaces shed major amounts of their surfaces is rather silly.

The point is, RJ Lee have not investigated this, they are not interested in this, and they just fired off a quick just-so story to Ron. The bottom line is not that RJ Lee thinks they know exactly how iron spheres or lead condensations occurred. The bottom line is that in their educated professional opinion, no temperatures above those reached in fierce building fires are needed. When RJ Lee talk about "extreme temperatures", they are NOT thinking about temperatures that building fires can't reach.

And that refutes the point that ergo an C7 are trying to make - that RJ Lee's statements are meant to imply temps that are impossible in a building fire.


RJ Lee is probably wrong on the specifics. That is my opinion.


What neither RJ Lee nor truthers nor most others here have so far considered is the many other chemical reactions that are guaranteed to happen when large office buildings burn out of control.

For example, take lead. RJ Lee seems to imply the simplistic idea that lead condensed out of lead vapor which in turn is the result of elemental lead being vaporized. This is almost certainly nonsense. The extreme melting point of lead and its very low vapor pressure speak against that.
However, lead is contained in PVC and other compounds. When these burn, you will have a hodgepodge of lead compounds that will vaporize much more readily than bulk elemental lead. All sorts of chemical reactions can now take place with these lead compounds in the hot air, including reductions and oxidations. Eventually, these lead comounds will condense on the surfaces o particles, and that's where RJ Lee found the lead.

For example, take iron. Iron will be attacked by all sorts of things in the hot aggressive gasses that result from office fires. Tons of PVC will release HCl, HCl will quickly attack steel and corrode it, producing several iron compounds such as chlorides. FeCl3 has a boiling point of only 319°C. There is no limit to the number of compounds that may be formed in the heat. More iron is found in combustible organic materials such as paper or paints. Again, the organics will mostly turn to gas, the iron compounds get concentrated and enriched in tiny particles. There is the phenomenon of melting point depression of tiny particles. In short: In an office fire, many paths are available for iron to find itself enriched in particles that will end up as spheres.

Do I have evidence that these processes are sufficient to explain whatever truthers want to have explained? Hell no. But as sure as hell, none of that is outlandish. In fact, condensed lead vapors and iron spheres are total expected by RJ Lee. Not because they know exactly what happened with everything in the WTC fires.

I am pretty sure they expect lead vapors and iron speres simply because, in their professional experience with forensic investigation of materials, they have encountered lead and spheres again and again. They were not surprised.
 
This is an interesting attempt at damage control.

You are, on the one hand, attempting to re-insert the idea that ordinary fires can create these spheres, while rejecting RJ Lee's attempt to explain how that might have occurred.

You seem to want to claim that extreme temperatures were present, but that they were also an "ordinary" aspect of the fires. RJ Lee does not present this view. They clearly felt the need to explain how extreme temperatures, "blast-furnace-like" temperatures, could have been produced by normal office fires, and you just rejected that explanation. So you're back to square one, after all this. :D

???

Man, you're out of it. Sorry.

Nowhere in the report you cite does it even hint that extreme temps are NEEDED to create the spheres. NOWHERE. Just because they say the "extreme" temps exist, doesn't mean they were required. This has been explained to you ten thousand times. Get your head out of the sand and friggin LISTEN for once.

Damn.
 
A great demonstration that 9/11 Truth is a Zombie Doctrine - you can kill it with facts but it just keeps coming forward.

I'm not going to argue with this troll over these points. Their arguments fail every time, regardless whether they admit it or not.

They haven't shown molten steel in the WTC pictures. There obviously was none to be seen.

They might as well be arguing that more tax breaks will erase the fiscal deficit....:cool:
 
I see no one bit on this one.


I thought that was called "getting older".
Y'all studiously ignored the word "technically" so you could waste a lot of column space with childish insults. :rolleyes:

These people used the words "running", "streams" and "river" but you all have a playbook of reasons not to believe the preponderance of evidence that there was molten/melted steel/iron. You think know so much better than the people who were there.

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“When we were down at the B1 level, one of the firefighters said, ‘I think you’d be interested in this,’ and they pulled off a big block of concrete and there was like a little river of steel flowing.” –Leslie Robertson, Chief Structural Engineer for the World Trade Center, speaking at Stanford University, April 2002[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“Going below, it was smoky and really hot…The debris past the columns was red-hot, molten, running.” — Richard Garlock, Structural Engineer, LERA [/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“The heat was so intense we encountered rivers of molten steel.” [/COLOR]-— NYFD firefighter, recorded in documentary film, “The First 24 Hours”

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“We descended deep below street level to areas where underground fires still burned and steel flowed in molten streams.” —William Langewiesche, American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“You’d get down below and you’d see molten steel, molten steel, running down the channel rails, like you’re in a foundry, like lava.”—Philip Ruvolo, Captain, FDNY, documentary “Collateral Damages”, 2003[/COLOR]

“…in the early days, the streams of molten metal that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole.” —William Langewiesche, American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center
 
The bottom line is that in their educated professional opinion, no temperatures above those reached in fierce building fires are needed. When RJ Lee talk about "extreme temperatures", they are NOT thinking about temperatures that building fires can't reach.

And that refutes the point that ergo an C7 are trying to make - that RJ Lee's statements are meant to imply temps that are impossible in a building fire.


RJ Lee is probably wrong on the specifics. That is my opinion.

Given that there are limited specifics upon which one can conjecture for the creation of iron and other metallic microspheres during the one-hour office fires, they obviously chose a scenario that they felt could be explained by the science. That is that, because the steel columns could not be heated to sufficient temperatures, it must have been (to them) iron or rust flakes from the iron that melted in the ambient heat.

Given that everyone views this e-mail from R J Lee as "settling" things for all time, it is odd that you are rejecting their attempt at an explanation, while still trying to assert that their position is that normal office fires can create these spheres. If normal office fires could create these spheres, then wouldn't they just say that? Wouldn't that be easier than conjecturing about chimneys and rust flakes?
 
The obvious problem here is that Ron Wieck didn't know what questions to ask.
 
A great demonstration that 9/11 Truth is a Zombie Doctrine - you can kill it with facts but it just keeps coming forward.

They haven't shown molten steel in the WTC pictures. There obviously was none to be seen.
We show you this picture of molten steel/iron but you simply deny it and continue to claim that it doesn't exist.

moltensteelincrabclawcr.jpg
 
I'm not sure what to think of that image. It actually looks better as a close up, like you have here. It looks a little more fake farther away.


But why do these images not indicate melting?

111notmeltedsteelabcd.jpg

111notmeltedsteelabcde.jpg



How realistic is it that these could be formed at the red-hot stage of steel deformation?
 
Y'all studiously ignored the word "technically" so you could waste a lot of column space with childish insults. :rolleyes:

These people used the words "running", "streams" and "river" but you all have a playbook of reasons not to believe the preponderance of evidence that there was molten/melted steel/iron. You think know so much better than the people who were there.

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“When we were down at the B1 level, one of the firefighters said, ‘I think you’d be interested in this,’ and they pulled off a big block of concrete and there was like a little river of steel flowing.” –Leslie Robertson, Chief Structural Engineer for the World Trade Center, speaking at Stanford University, April 2002[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“Going below, it was smoky and really hot…The debris past the columns was red-hot, molten, running.” — Richard Garlock, Structural Engineer, LERA [/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“The heat was so intense we encountered rivers of molten steel.” [/COLOR]-— NYFD firefighter, recorded in documentary film, “The First 24 Hours”

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“We descended deep below street level to areas where underground fires still burned and steel flowed in molten streams.” —William Langewiesche, American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“You’d get down below and you’d see molten steel, molten steel, running down the channel rails, like you’re in a foundry, like lava.”—Philip Ruvolo, Captain, FDNY, documentary “Collateral Damages”, 2003[/COLOR]

“…in the early days, the streams of molten metal that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole.” —William Langewiesche, American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center

All quotes from AFTER the collapse and thus irrelevant to the cause of the collapse.
 
I'm not sure what to think of that image. It actually looks better as a close up, like you have here. It looks a little more fake farther away.


But why do these images not indicate melting?

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/111notmeltedsteelabcd.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/111notmeltedsteelabcde.jpg[/qimg]


How realistic is it that these could be formed at the red-hot stage of steel deformation?

Those clearly indicate severe compromise, but short of MELTED.

MELTED steel (any metal) will produce a pool of formerly molten SLAG. That's not what the image is. The image is obviously deformed, which ( I assume ) we can agree is possible in between solid and melted.

It deforms. It weakens. It becomes PLIABLE.

You've seen blacksmiths make swords. That metal is pliable. Not MELTED.

holy christ on a stick! GET A NEW HOBBY!
 
We show you this picture of molten steel/iron but you simply deny it and continue to claim that it doesn't exist.

[qimg]http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/2214/moltensteelincrabclawcr.jpg[/qimg]

And what temperature does steel become red hot Christopher?

:rolleyes:
 
Y'all studiously ignored the word "technically" so you could waste a lot of column space with childish insults. :rolleyes:

These people used the words "running", "streams" and "river" but you all have a playbook of reasons not to believe the preponderance of evidence that there was molten/melted steel/iron. You think know so much better than the people who were there.

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“When we were down at the B1 level, one of the firefighters said, ‘I think you’d be interested in this,’ and they pulled off a big block of concrete and there was like a little river of steel flowing.” –Leslie Robertson, Chief Structural Engineer for the World Trade Center, speaking at Stanford University, April 2002[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“Going below, it was smoky and really hot…The debris past the columns was red-hot, molten, running.” — Richard Garlock, Structural Engineer, LERA [/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“The heat was so intense we encountered rivers of molten steel.” [/COLOR]-— NYFD firefighter, recorded in documentary film, “The First 24 Hours”

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“We descended deep below street level to areas where underground fires still burned and steel flowed in molten streams.” —William Langewiesche, American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#d8d7777]“You’d get down below and you’d see molten steel, molten steel, running down the channel rails, like you’re in a foundry, like lava.”—Philip Ruvolo, Captain, FDNY, documentary “Collateral Damages”, 2003[/COLOR]

“…in the early days, the streams of molten metal that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole.” —William Langewiesche, American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center


So what Chris? People reporting melted steel in fires is common. Here's just a small sampling. Was thermite used here as well?

But you think just twisted/bent metal is "molten", which can happen way below its melting temperature, so I don't know how you can claim molten = thermite anyway.





"The heat of the fire that erupted when the tanker crashed melted the heavy steel girders supporting the overpass, causing it to sag about 7 feet toward"
-Bridge repair rushed
Connecticut Post - NewsBank - Mar 27, 2004


A fire in a wrecked chemical truck Friday caused an estimated million damage by melting bridge girders
-Truck Fire Burns Hole In Bridge .
Youngstown Vindicator - Dec 3, 1977


The massive six-alarm blaze caused by a construction accident, melted steel girders on nearby construction projects
-Massive Fire Engulfs Several Blocks .
Boca Raton News -May 20, 2000


"PITTSBURGH - A spectacular general alarm fire, its heat so intense that it melted steel girders, has destroyed a vacant warehouse in the city's Strip"
-Spectacular Fire .
Gettysburg Times Aug 9, 1975


"The fire, fueled by the undersea oil and gas the crewmen worked each day to harness, burned so hot it melted the steel girders. First the derrick collapsed"
-- DISASTERS STRIKE WORLDS APART OIL RIG
Miami Herald - July 8, 1988


" That truck type has several compartments, each holding about 5,000 gallons" said Birmingham Fire Chief Eugene Rouveyrol. "It must have been burning at at least 5,000 degrees to melt those steel bridge girders", added the chief"
"Rig Fire Burns Hole In Bridge"
-- Youngstown Vindicator - Dec 3, 1977


"What apparently drove residents to risk life and limb was dense, acrid smoke that filled the building and flames "so hot they melted steel," [Fire Commissioner Raymond] Orozco said."
4 DIE IN HIGH-RISE FIRE
-- Chicago Sun-Times - January 18, 1996


"Temperatures in the buildings mist have reached at least 1000 degrees to melt the steel beams that supoorted the roof, Lexington County Fire Coordinator Louis Seyle said"
- Heavy Damages In Boat Manufacturing Company
-- Newberry Observer - Jun 18, 1984
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
I still cant believe that Chris has defined "molten" as a twisted and bent piece of steel


I thought with you, everything was expected?

MM

I have no idea what you think you are replying to. Chris said that the pictures of twisted and bent steel in the pictures I posted on the previous page were actually "molten", if you agree with that then what you are calling "molten" steel can be achieved at very low temperatures compared to its actual melting point.
 
Last edited:
We show you this picture of molten steel/iron but you simply deny it and continue to claim that it doesn't exist.

[qimg]http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/2214/moltensteelincrabclawcr.jpg[/qimg]
:dl:

Dude, it still has square edges. It is nowhere NEAR liquified. That stuff dripping off of it could well be either sand or ground chip board. I have pulled stuff like that out of several fires.
 

Back
Top Bottom